So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol
Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
- post_hoc
- Coach
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
- Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.post_hoc wrote:So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol
- post_hoc
- Coach
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
- Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.Beaussie wrote:Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.post_hoc wrote:So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?post_hoc wrote:So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.Beaussie wrote:Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.post_hoc wrote:So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol



Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Simple fact is Sokka just doesn't rate .
Tried it on FTA ..rated terribly
STV ratings ..woeful
I can't see any way there will be a massive increase .
Only way is a bidding war
FOX V OPTUS or another .
If that doesn't happen ...good luck with an increase
Tried it on FTA ..rated terribly
STV ratings ..woeful
I can't see any way there will be a massive increase .
Only way is a bidding war
FOX V OPTUS or another .
If that doesn't happen ...good luck with an increase
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Oh gees, can't believe it. I'm in total agreement with AFLcrap1AFLcrap1 wrote:Simple fact is Sokka just doesn't rate .
Tried it on FTA ..rated terribly
STV ratings ..woeful
I can't see any way there will be a massive increase .
Only way is a bidding war
FOX V OPTUS or another .
If that doesn't happen ...good luck with an increase

-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Who can be bothered sitting inside watching soccer in the heat of summer when you can be at the beach or outdoors. That's why people don't want to watch on tv!
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
- post_hoc
- Coach
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
- Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
You don't have a $billion annual TV deal you idiotBeaussie wrote:Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?post_hoc wrote:So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.Beaussie wrote:Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.post_hoc wrote:So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol![]()
![]()
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Where did I mention anything about annual figures. FFSpost_hoc wrote:You don't have a $billion annual TV deal you idiotBeaussie wrote:Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?post_hoc wrote:So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.Beaussie wrote:Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.post_hoc wrote:So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol![]()
![]()
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
- post_hoc
- Coach
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
- Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
My $60 million prediction is a fucking annual figure you idiot. You then said talk to me when you have $1 billion. So you skip from a discussion on Annual to a total package.Beaussie wrote:Where did I mention anything about annual figures. FFSpost_hoc wrote:You don't have a $billion annual TV deal you idiotBeaussie wrote:Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?post_hoc wrote:So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.Beaussie wrote:Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.post_hoc wrote:So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take notesydneyfc wrote:not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.
im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus
gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol![]()
![]()
So like I said you don't have a$1 Billion annual deal. Now go away and learn to comprehend before you make a bigger fool of yourself.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- post_hoc
- Coach
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
- Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
I think Phil Rothfield is off the mark but he posted in the telegraph earlier in the week the possibility of a $500 million over 5 seasons deal.
Like I said, I think off the mark but very interesting
Like I said, I think off the mark but very interesting
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm
- post_hoc
- Coach
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
- Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location:
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Yep, and you saw the start of it last week and you will see it again on Tuesday night. Channel 9 are showing the Socceroos qualifying rounds.Beaussie wrote:Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Hang on, I thought the Socceroos deal was separate to the A-League deal. Any specific interest shown by commercial networks in the A-League? With the biggest opening round game attracting a mere 142k nationwide audience I'd be concerned if I was the FFA. Other games on the weekend rated even worse.post_hoc wrote:Yep, and you saw the start of it last week and you will see it again on Tuesday night. Channel 9 are showing the Socceroos qualifying rounds.Beaussie wrote:Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm

Sat STV #ALeague #FoxSports #SydneyDerby 142k
Sat STV #ALeague #FoxSports #WELvMCY 80k
Sat STV #ALeague #FoxSports #PERvCCM 60k
Fri STV #ALeague #FoxSports #BRIvMVC 129k
Fri TV #ALeague #SBS2 #BRIvMVC 118k
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal
Um, your point about the Socceroos is?post_hoc wrote:Yep, and you saw the start of it last week and you will see it again on Tuesday night. Channel 9 are showing the Socceroos qualifying rounds.Beaussie wrote:Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm

This will be hilarious. A-League is worth shit without the Socceroos.



A-League TV rights to be sold separately from Socceroos
DAVID DAVUTOVIC, Herald Sun
May 9, 2016 7:57pm
THE A-League TV rights will be sold independently for the first time, with FFA blocked from bundling Socceroos rights into one package.
The unprecedented step leaves uncertainty around the A-League’s broadcast value, with the current $40m-a-year TV deal inclusive of the first phase of 2018 World Cup qualifiers and the 2015 Asian Cup.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/footb ... bff774a5fb