Talking Footy

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Barassi a failure at GWS? I think you mean Sheedy mate.

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

post_hoc wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

Amount to nothing? How so? It is 1.7 million people playing a sport, I can only assume enjoying it, what should it amount to?

leagueiscrap wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

Amount to nothing? How so? It is 1.7 million people playing a sport, I can only assume enjoying it, what should it amount to?

most of those people that play soccer stop at the age of around 16 or 17

post_hoc wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

Amount to nothing? How so? It is 1.7 million people playing a sport, I can only assume enjoying it, what should it amount to?

most of those people that play soccer stop at the age of around 16 or 17

As do most sports, yet to see a sport with more 18 year olds playing than 14 year olds

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

Amount to nothing? How so? It is 1.7 million people playing a sport, I can only assume enjoying it, what should it amount to?

most of those people that play soccer stop at the age of around 16 or 17

As do most sports, yet to see a sport with more 18 year olds playing than 14 year olds

Is this going to be your thing??? Like Pussy craps on about TV ratings to say RL is number 1, Para craps on about Paramatta being the next big thing AFLCRAPPER well he just craps on, so are you the next one to continually repeat the same thing???? Popularity is not the same as success - soccer regularly goes thru periods where there on the rise and when they are getting criticised - the biggest problem for soccer is its boring to play and watch - nobody thinks it's masculin to be rolling around crying on the ground because someone brushed past you! Give it a rest, you like it and that's all that matters.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

Amount to nothing? How so? It is 1.7 million people playing a sport, I can only assume enjoying it, what should it amount to?

most of those people that play soccer stop at the age of around 16 or 17

As do most sports, yet to see a sport with more 18 year olds playing than 14 year olds

Is this going to be your thing??? Like Pussy craps on about TV ratings to say RL is number 1, Para craps on about Paramatta being the next big thing AFLCRAPPER well he just craps on, so are you the next one to continually repeat the same thing???? Popularity is not the same as success - soccer regularly goes thru periods where there on the rise and when they are getting criticised - the biggest problem for soccer is its boring to play and watch - nobody thinks it's masculin to be rolling around crying on the ground because someone brushed past you! Give it a rest, you like it and that's all that matters.

Seeing as you mentioned me .
I don't crap on .
I ask for weak lying fumblers such as yourself to back up your lies with a source .
As of yet you've failed to produce .


Why is that .

The_Wookie wrote:

pussycat wrote:

They made some ort of partnership with touch football. Its questionable. But
At least they didn't tell outright lies like the AFL did at Birchgrove oval or make claims that there 80m in there future fund.

It really is funny how much you believe the media when you want to isnt it. One news limited media report on an AFL fund and its gospel. When news limited reports on the NRl though its all full of shit. The hypocrisy is amazing.

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol the bargarsi line .
Seeing as we've overtaken AFL in participation numbers I think the line is an irrelevant piece of crap .

But you havent really taken over the particpation numbers have you. The entire increase is due to the Touch affiliation. Not due to Rugby league - the ARLC doesnt count Touch football Australia **** its subsidaries by the way, so claiming its participants as their own is a little laughable.

Also lol @ Rugby league talking about experiences again.

Total club players for the NRL - 179,506 (and not even 10.5k outside NSW/QLD)
Total club players for the AFL - 336,108

Total clubs for the NRl - 1,077 in NSW, QLD, no specified number for the rest. Perhaps league should be concerned that they lost 50 clubs in 2015 in Qld alone, and another 40 odd in country NSW.
Total clubs for the AFL - 2,763

And Football has 1,700,000 according to Roy Morgan, but you really don't want to talk about that.

I would argue Rugby Union has successfully crossed the Barassi line more so than AFL, mind you Barassi himself couldn't cross it, being a complete failure at GWS.

Pitty those numbers amount to nothing.

Amount to nothing? How so? It is 1.7 million people playing a sport, I can only assume enjoying it, what should it amount to?

most of those people that play soccer stop at the age of around 16 or 17

As do most sports, yet to see a sport with more 18 year olds playing than 14 year olds

Is this going to be your thing??? Like Pussy craps on about TV ratings to say RL is number 1, Para craps on about Paramatta being the next big thing AFLCRAPPER well he just craps on, so are you the next one to continually repeat the same thing???? Popularity is not the same as success - soccer regularly goes thru periods where there on the rise and when they are getting criticised - the biggest problem for soccer is its boring to play and watch - nobody thinks it's masculin to be rolling around crying on the ground because someone brushed past you! Give it a rest, you like it and that's all that matters.

Seeing as you mentioned me .
I don't crap on .
I ask for weak lying fumblers such as yourself to back up your lies with a source .
As of yet you've failed to produce .


Why is that .

It really doesn't take much to reel you in you know - maybe I should call you fish?? Hahaha

The_Wookie wrote:

pussycat wrote:

There is a huge difference between sensationalising a story, like the News Ltd press are prone to do. And outright lies, which was the case with the Artsy Fartsy League and it lies at Birchgrove and the previous years Annul report. It not only claimed there was 80m in there future fund it also claimed that the money had never been touched .

So when news sensationalise the AFL its ok. But when its an NRL story its not?

Your a fucking two faced bullshit artist of the highest order on this forum. Ill grant the particpation numbers supplied werent the right ones for Birchgrove, but almost nothing else about that saga is true as reported in the fucking fairfax press whose editor had a fucking stake in the soccer club that was going to be affected.

But where were you at when the media claimed the NRLs financial reserves were nowhere near what they should be? I bet you just accepted that was the case didnt you. Didnt argue the point at all I bet.