Page 3 of 10

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 6:33 pm
by eelofwest
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
So, this much is correct yeah... if Fox simulcast games, the NRL must pay Channel 9, $30 million annually right? Yeah, sounds like a great deal. :?>
It still almost $800m from 9, fox would be forced to double its last deal for 8 matches . So not only have you lost c9 as a bidder but your also pretty much farked as far as Fox goes :_<> :_<>
As reported, Nine can use the $30 million it gets from Fox in a bid for AFL.

As far as Fox goes, there is little doubt they will pay big for the AFL. One just needs to appreciate the fact that Fox Footy is the number 1 channel on Foxtel. Number 1 you hear.

Its is well known that the NRL is number 1 on Fox

NSW and QLD make up %60 of Fox subs, If you think Fox can afford to loose the NRL rights then your a dill.

My prediction on NRL right for FTA and Fox is 8 games simulcast on Fox with 4 live on 9

9 800million
Fox 1billion or about %45 more then last deal

Now add about 100million from NZ Sky and digital rights and that should get the NRL close to 2billion.

The Fat lady will be singing in 1 years time derpballers.. :lol: :lol: :wink:

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 11:59 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
So, this much is correct yeah... if Fox simulcast games, the NRL must pay Channel 9, $30 million annually right? Yeah, sounds like a great deal. :?>
It still almost $800m from 9, fox would be forced to double its last deal for 8 matches . So not only have you lost c9 as a bidder but your also pretty much farked as far as Fox goes :_<> :_<>
As reported, Nine can use the $30 million it gets from Fox in a bid for AFL.

As far as Fox goes, there is little doubt they will pay big for the AFL. One just needs to appreciate the fact that Fox Footy is the number 1 channel on Foxtel. Number 1 you hear.
Anyone that invests in AFL cant be right in the head! Any money C9 has left will be put aside for when the 2nd Brisbane side comes into the competition.

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:08 am
by AFLcrap1
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
So, this much is correct yeah... if Fox simulcast games, the NRL must pay Channel 9, $30 million annually right? Yeah, sounds like a great deal. :?>
It still almost $800m from 9, fox would be forced to double its last deal for 8 matches . So not only have you lost c9 as a bidder but your also pretty much farked as far as Fox goes :_<> :_<>
As reported, Nine can use the $30 million it gets from Fox in a bid for AFL.

As far as Fox goes, there is little doubt they will pay big for the AFL. One just needs to appreciate the fact that Fox Footy is the number 1 channel on Foxtel. Number 1 you hear.
Poor old Bea ,like a lot of fumblers is still, in stage 1

5 Stages of Grief

Denial — One of the first reactions is denial, wherein the survivor imagines a false, preferable reality.
Anger — When the individual recognizes that denial cannot continue, it becomes frustrated, especially at proximate individuals. Certain psychological responses of a person undergoing this phase would be: "Why me? It's not fair!"; "How can this happen to me?"; '"Who is to blame?"; "Why would this happen?".
Bargaining — The third stage involves the hope that the individual can avoid a cause of grief. Usually, the negotiation for an extended life is made in exchange for a reformed lifestyle. Other times, they will use anything valuable against another human agency to extend or prolong the life. People facing less serious trauma can bargain or seek compromise.
Depression — "I'm so sad, why bother with anything?"; "I'm going to die soon so what's the point?"; "I miss my loved one, why go on?"
During the fourth stage, the individual becomes saddened by the mathematical probability of death. In this state, the individual may become silent, refuse visitors and spend much of the time mournful and sullen.
Acceptance — "It's going to be okay."; "I can't fight it, I may as well prepare for it."; "Nothing is impossible."
In this last stage, individuals embrace mortality or inevitable future, or that of a loved one, or other tragic event. People dying may precede the survivors in this state, which typically comes with a calm, retrospective view for the individual, and a stable condition of emotions.
Kübler-Ross later expanded her model to include any form of personal loss, such as the death of a loved one, the loss of a job or income, major rejection, the end of a relationship or divorce, drug addiction, incarceration, the onset of a disease or chronic illness, an infertility diagnosis, and even minor losses.

Both sufferers and therapists have reported the usefulness of the Kübler-Ross Model in a wide variety of situations. The subsections below give a few specific examples of how the model can be applied in different situations:

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 10:19 am
by leeroy*NRL*
More of this come (with Thursday night footy)

#NRLCowboysSouths Nine/GEM 629k (400k SYD, 190k BRI, 30k MEL, 9k PER)

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 11:22 am
by pussycat
AFL boss Gillon McLachlan has held talks with media chiefs in Sydney this week with the prevailing view that Channel Nine is no longer a player in the battle for televised Australian rules football.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/AFL- ... z3ikOSUuUr
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 11:33 am
by AFLcrap1
pussycat wrote:
AFL boss Gillon McLachlan has held talks with media chiefs in Sydney this week with the prevailing view that Channel Nine is no longer a player in the battle for televised Australian rules football.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/AFL- ... z3ikOSUuUr
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
:_<> :_<>

But but but but Bea was gloating how competitive the bidding would be with ALL commercial stations wanting a slice of derpball .

So many lols .

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 2:48 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
The AFL have said they want there Tv rights deal done before end of year.

So I would think the NRL will be the same.

so not long now and we can finally see who is KING

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 10:27 am
by eelofwest
Those saying the NRL will struggle to sell the "lesser" games are misguided. They will get somewhere between $750 and $850 million and complete a deal that Smith was hired to do from day one. And one which he has nailed.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z3ivv2eYZv
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook


1.8billion+ here we come.... =D> =D> :wink: :wink: :lol:

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 11:10 am
by AFLcrap1
Fumblers have gone MIA .
Lol

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 12:56 pm
by Beaussie
eelofwest wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
So, this much is correct yeah... if Fox simulcast games, the NRL must pay Channel 9, $30 million annually right? Yeah, sounds like a great deal. :?>
It still almost $800m from 9, fox would be forced to double its last deal for 8 matches . So not only have you lost c9 as a bidder but your also pretty much farked as far as Fox goes :_<> :_<>
As reported, Nine can use the $30 million it gets from Fox in a bid for AFL.

As far as Fox goes, there is little doubt they will pay big for the AFL. One just needs to appreciate the fact that Fox Footy is the number 1 channel on Foxtel. Number 1 you hear.

Its is well known that the NRL is number 1 on Fox
Oh really?

Wake up stupid. :^o
The AFL is crucial to Foxtel's bid to secure more subscriptions, a point reinforced in that Fox Footy through the season has been the No.1 channel on subscription television based on weekly share.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv- ... z3CI3vy4Ua

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:04 pm
by eelofwest
Beaussie wrote:
eelofwest wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
So, this much is correct yeah... if Fox simulcast games, the NRL must pay Channel 9, $30 million annually right? Yeah, sounds like a great deal. :?>
It still almost $800m from 9, fox would be forced to double its last deal for 8 matches . So not only have you lost c9 as a bidder but your also pretty much farked as far as Fox goes :_<> :_<>
As reported, Nine can use the $30 million it gets from Fox in a bid for AFL.

As far as Fox goes, there is little doubt they will pay big for the AFL. One just needs to appreciate the fact that Fox Footy is the number 1 channel on Foxtel. Number 1 you hear.

Its is well known that the NRL is number 1 on Fox
Oh really?

Wake up stupid. :^o
The AFL is crucial to Foxtel's bid to secure more subscriptions, a point reinforced in that Fox Footy through the season has been the No.1 channel on subscription television based on weekly share.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv- ... z3CI3vy4Ua

Number 1 channel does not make it the number one code on that medium

New flash for dopes like you

NRL 5 games 3 shows
AFL 9 games 6+ shows

It would be a disaster for your fumble ball if the total viewrship was not large with all those games and talk shows.

NRL ave 22% larger tv ratings on Fox and also have the highest ratings talk show in the Matty johns show

NRL is quality

AFL quantity

If the NRL get FOXNRL with sumulcasting of all 8 games then it will be all over red rover..... :lol: :lol: :wink: =D>

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:07 pm
by Beaussie
Once again for the ********. ](*,)
The AFL is crucial to Foxtel's bid to secure more subscriptions, a point reinforced in that Fox Footy through the season has been the No.1 channel on subscription television based on weekly share.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv- ... z3CI3vy4Ua

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:09 pm
by eelofwest
Beaussie wrote:
Once again for the ********. ](*,)
The AFL is crucial to Foxtel's bid to secure more subscriptions, a point reinforced in that Fox Footy through the season has been the No.1 channel on subscription television based on weekly share.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv- ... z3CI3vy4Ua
Yeah ignore the facts because if you take those facts into your little brain it might actually explode with but hurt......... :lol: :lol:

AFL 9 Live games 6 shows
NRL 5 games 3 shows


FOXNRL with 8 games simulcast with 6+ shows and it would game set and match dopey.... :lol: :wink:

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:13 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:
eelofwest wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
So, this much is correct yeah... if Fox simulcast games, the NRL must pay Channel 9, $30 million annually right? Yeah, sounds like a great deal. :?>
It still almost $800m from 9, fox would be forced to double its last deal for 8 matches . So not only have you lost c9 as a bidder but your also pretty much farked as far as Fox goes :_<> :_<>
As reported, Nine can use the $30 million it gets from Fox in a bid for AFL.

As far as Fox goes, there is little doubt they will pay big for the AFL. One just needs to appreciate the fact that Fox Footy is the number 1 channel on Foxtel. Number 1 you hear.

Its is well known that the NRL is number 1 on Fox
Oh really?

Wake up stupid. :^o
The AFL is crucial to Foxtel's bid to secure more subscriptions, a point reinforced in that Fox Footy through the season has been the No.1 channel on subscription television based on weekly share.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv- ... z3CI3vy4Ua
The best you can come up with is an article that's twelve months old :_<> you Vicheads are really desperate.

Re: NRL gets 925 mill for 4 games per week .

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:15 pm
by Beaussie
You got anything more recent that proves Fox Footy is still not the No.1 channel on Foxtel?

Nup, didn't think so... loser.