Talking Footy

Lol .
You ignored my post showing the midgets getting 26 million out of the ACT taxpayer ,after you had a shot at the Raiders about taxpayer funds .
Why is that .
Lol it's like shooting dumb fish in a barrel .

You post .
I show you up
You claim I'm trolling while you're deflecting from my post .

Next up will be the usual basement nurse basement nurse rant .
It's how you deflect .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol .
You ignored my post showing the midgets getting 26 million out of the ACT taxpayer ,after you had a shot at the Raiders about taxpayer funds .
Why is that .
Lol it's like shooting dumb fish in a barrel .

You post .
I show you up
You claim I'm trolling while you're deflecting from my post .

Next up will be the usual basement nurse basement nurse rant .
It's how you deflect .

if you read the article, its sponsorship of the club and sponsorship and naming rights of the actual oval

now if we go to your son dribbler dave's unwanted raiders,
its appearance fees & pay roll tax concessions,
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-new ... 1xzpx.html
on top of that their poke venues are turning over millions themself, they still receive tax breaks

It's still taxpayer $$$ spent on an out of town team .
At least the raiders are a home team .

Lol you're not real bright .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

It's still taxpayer $$$ spent on an out of town team .
At least the raiders are a home team .

Lol you're not real bright .

One is sponsorship on the stadium and on the Giants, as they have worked out that they want the act to be see,so they sponsor the Giants not the NRLOLs Raiders with a declining minnow fan base.calculations are done are by spending that money will attract tourism and money back in to the local economy as well

English please .
& your hypocrisy is showing once again .

Have a shot at raiders / tax payer $$$
It's fine that a blow in team uses tax payer$$ .

You really don't have a lot going on upstairs do you ?