Talking Footy

Posted: **Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:03 am**

Parramatta are over 18k in memberships, stick your 14k up your arse and stop posting garbage.

Why not look at facts before hitting enter.

Posted: **Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:06 am**

I don't get it, well I do, but meh.

The dogs average between 27k and 32k for Parra games at anz, they got that last friday but it's a bad result?

Hmmmm, 10 years ago this game would have been a sell out at Belmore at around 17-18k, when the eels take a home match the anz vs the dogs, the Parra average is around 32k. It just shows that NRL fans are more likely to go to their own home teams home ground to help them, but they'd rather not help their rivals in that department.

The NRL needs to change this.

Posted: **Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:29 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
it was a fucking joke, jesus you are thick.

Stop deflecting trying to protect your fan boy. He stated something I am asking evidence.

No deflecting .
Just thought that it was very hypocriteical for someone to ask for proof ,when that person won't do the same when asked .

Lol

Posted: **Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:32 pm**

& for someone to claim another poster is deflecting when that poster won't talk about Doc outrating the Lol league ,is laughable .
You were in that thread but not once talked about it .
Hysterical deflection from yourself .

Keep it up capo ,it's very entertaining .

Posted: **Wed Mar 18, 2015 1:39 pm**

wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie

Posted: **Wed Mar 18, 2015 1:41 pm**

Meh, they played a team from another country with a population smaller than Sydney, the Raiders come from an area that represents only half a million people and the ratings still smashed, naaaa near obliterated the lol leagues best.

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 9:03 am**

Raiderdave wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
how the fuck is anything like 8k an acceptable crowd for a professional sport during the regular season, let alone two? (and we wont mention the 6k for Penrith) The AFL had bigger fucking crowds for fucking practice matches in the fucking country on the weekend. f it was GWS you'd hang shit on it - so you're just going to have live with this until people actially go to your fucking miserable excuse for a live game experience.

Fuckin roll out the excuses..its round 2 lol.
Hmm need to keep a list of these excuses for shit crowds i think.
:_<>
Spare us the lectures dickhead
How bout the sydney swifts having bigger crowds then the midgets you halfwit hypocrite
For a team that the VFL spent 40 million on in their first year

Is that acceptable ?

So fuck off with yr sanctimonius superior attitude

Yr BS sport is a joke in all bar 4 states of one country

Nothing will ever change that
It must suck to b a fumblederper :_<>

Hang on, Raiderdave,

You're saying AFL is a joke in NSW and QLD?

In 2014, the four northern AFL clubs in these two states sold 942,000 tickets to 46 games with an average crowd of 20,478.

That is NOT a joke. That's enviable.

The crowd average even swamps the NRL crowd average in its motherland city of Sydney where my family have lived for 166 years.

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:02 am**

The_Wookie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie
Im not defending Raider - would be the last person here to - but im still waiting for your evidence, and "simple deduction" isnt proof of anything - and you havent established "pet membership numbers" AT ALL.

=D> =D> =D> =D>

Thanks Wookie .
This lying little capo wannabe ,is the biggest fucking hypocrite on here .
Demanding proof ,when he does not provide proof of his bullshit claims ..

Show us the 8 k pet memberships ,& what you think or say they are is not proof .
You lied & got caught out .

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:49 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie

Your claim half the ANZ crowd on Friday got in for free
Proved it yet wanker ?

Ill continue to wait shall I ?

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:54 pm**

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
how the fuck is anything like 8k an acceptable crowd for a professional sport during the regular season, let alone two? (and we wont mention the 6k for Penrith) The AFL had bigger fucking crowds for fucking practice matches in the fucking country on the weekend. f it was GWS you'd hang shit on it - so you're just going to have live with this until people actially go to your fucking miserable excuse for a live game experience.

Fuckin roll out the excuses..its round 2 lol.
Hmm need to keep a list of these excuses for shit crowds i think.
:_<>
Spare us the lectures dickhead
How bout the sydney swifts having bigger crowds then the midgets you halfwit hypocrite
For a team that the VFL spent 40 million on in their first year

Is that acceptable ?

So fuck off with yr sanctimonius superior attitude

Yr BS sport is a joke in all bar 4 states of one country

Nothing will ever change that
It must suck to b a fumblederper :_<>
Hang on, Raiderdave,

You're saying AFL is a joke in NSW and QLD?

In 2014, the four northern AFL clubs in these two states sold 942,000 tickets to 46 games with an average crowd of 20,478.

That is NOT a joke. That's enviable.

.

&..... not many more veiwers on TV

:_<>
Fucking hilarious

So yes
They are jokes end of

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:33 pm**

The_Wookie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie
Im not defending Raider - would be the last person here to - but im still waiting for your evidence, and "simple deduction" isnt proof of anything - and you havent established "pet membership numbers" AT ALL.

I made a statement, I have backed it up with with my reason, lyingdave has done none of it

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:50 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie
Im not defending Raider - would be the last person here to - but im still waiting for your evidence, and "simple deduction" isnt proof of anything - and you havent established "pet membership numbers" AT ALL.
I made a statement, I have backed it up with with my reason, lyingdave has done none of it

Actually really surprised by your comment wookie. I looked at dogs average crowds from last year for non Sydney based teams, which would indicate the rough ticketed member numbers, as they are there week in week out, without the away team adding to the numbers. This hovered around the 13-14k mark. This is similar to the numbers of eels fans at parramatta. Rather simple to deduce that 28k is made up by memberships of each club. Now it might not be exactly 50% but wouldn't be far off.

Now where is the question on lyingdaves 7k?

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:09 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie
Im not defending Raider - would be the last person here to - but im still waiting for your evidence, and "simple deduction" isnt proof of anything - and you havent established "pet membership numbers" AT ALL.
I made a statement, I have backed it up with with my reason, lyingdave has done none of it

Lol ..
You made a claim about pet membership .
When asked to back it up with proof ,you waffled on with some shit .
Your reasoning is NOT proof or a source .
Hence you are full of shit .
& until you provide a source or admit you lied ,then you will be known as full of shit .

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:19 pm**

And lyingdave is exempt from providing evidence? I gave reasoning and stop bullshitting about the pet membership I backed it up with an article from the newspaper, just because you don't like the data doesn't mean it wasn't published.

Now where are your demands for lyingdaves evidence or bring a hypocrite is ok for you? Lol

Posted: **Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:19 pm**

Be interesting to see how long the deflection goes on to protect lyingdave from having to back up his statements.

Talking Footy

Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors

Re: Ratings for NRL’s Sunday night games hits a new low for Raiders v Warriors