Talking Footy

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Yeah agree, the club is supported by the idiots it seems, they'll be going no where.

its funny the club is attracting fans, that NRL clubs can only dream of

You mean like more people watching the eels each week on TV than your lot?

And we stink.

LOL

No no no .
According to Bomber logic ,there is no such thing as tv viewers.
They are invisible people .
TV stations pay out billions of $$$$$$ to show sport to nobody..imaginary people.
Poor old Bomber.
Laughed at everywhere he goes .

Ohh, one of those types eh, as soon as his team manages to out rate porky pig in NSW, he'll be the first screaming about the great ratings.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Yeah agree, the club is supported by the idiots it seems, they'll be going no where.

its funny the club is attracting fans, that NRL clubs can only dream of

You mean like more people watching the eels each week on TV than your lot?

And we stink.

LOL

No no no .
According to Bomber logic ,there is no such thing as tv viewers.
They are invisible people .
TV stations pay out billions of $$$$$$ to show sport to nobody..imaginary people.
Poor old Bomber.
Laughed at everywhere he goes .

yeah millions watch the NRL, but yet why doesn't it relate through the revenue streams
where are all those people!

Wookie you can try ,but it's like talking to turnip.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Wookie you can try ,but it's like talking to turnip.

Hey hey
No need to offend turnips

The_Wookie wrote:

it does translate through their fucking tv revenue, assessed by widely accepted internatioanl industry standards.

The off field revenue is fairly easily explained otherwise - and generally explained by having a less centrailised revenue than the AFL which collects a lot of revenue and distributes more back to the clubs.

so the AFL gives around 3 million per year extra to its clubs than the NRL does!

ok care to explain the union & a league system why they generate more nonbroadcast income that league?

Hi turnip .

LOL

leagueiscrap wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

it does translate through their fucking tv revenue, assessed by widely accepted internatioanl industry standards.

The off field revenue is fairly easily explained otherwise - and generally explained by having a less centrailised revenue than the AFL which collects a lot of revenue and distributes more back to the clubs.

so the AFL gives around 3 million per year extra to its clubs than the NRL does!

ok care to explain the union & a league system why they generate more nonbroadcast income that league?

Yeah I did in another thread, you going to run away or put your fingers in your ears while singing lalala lalala it's not true it's not true.

leagueiscrap wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

it does translate through their fucking tv revenue, assessed by widely accepted internatioanl industry standards.

The off field revenue is fairly easily explained otherwise - and generally explained by having a less centrailised revenue than the AFL which collects a lot of revenue and distributes more back to the clubs.

so the AFL gives around 3 million per year extra to its clubs than the NRL does!

ok care to explain the union & a league system why they generate more nonbroadcast income that league?

Yeah wookie

Pokes
Pokes
Pokes >

:_<>

Jesus
Frog shit has better comprehension skills

If you mean the pokies, Raider Dave, AFL clubs are getting revenue from them as well ever since the Victorian government legalised them. The only areas the AFL is ahead of the NRL in revenue is match day takings. On the others they are pretty close. I'm not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if more rugby league supporters are paying for Foxtel than AFL. Fox Sports treat the league fans better than Nine does.

Foolproof wrote:

If you mean the pokies, Raider Dave, AFL clubs are getting revenue from them as well ever since the Victorian government legalised them. The only areas the AFL is ahead of the NRL in revenue is match day takings. On the others they are pretty close. I'm not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if more rugby league supporters are paying for Foxtel than AFL. Fox Sports treat the league fans better than Nine does.

no the AFL clubs are decades ahead of the NRL clubs in all areas of revenue streams , but are only playing catch up in the poke ownership, due to them being legal for a longer period in NSW.

AFL TV deal $1.253 billion.
NRL TV deal $1.025 billion.

I call that close. And the NRL closes the gap with buy rates on Foxtel.

The TV ratings overall are also close, although admittedly the NRL need State of Origin to prop that up. I blame Nine for that shortfall.

So this discussion has nothing to do with the topic

True.