Page 3 of 4
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:36 pm
by post_hoc
actually the ABS data has different age brackets, and there are over 35's comps for Rugby League, whoops again more lies, gee KE_liar you really are having a bad day, lie after lie, you keep getting caught.
two lies in 1 post, man you are habitual.
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:39 pm
by post_hoc
Raiderdave wrote:post_hoc wrote:what I find funny is the 113,000 people that watched the Wanderers on TV and claimed to be such low number by KE_liar is still 9,000 more people than play Rugby League in the entire country.
So, if 99.68% of the country didn't bother watching, then slightly more number of people couldn't be bothered to pick up a rugby league ball and run into a meathead.
1.8 million play RL & its other variants in this country you stupid lying raider :_<>

Not sure is Raiderdave is lying or just an idiot? 1.8 million LOL, talking about making figures up, 1.8 million, is this like the imaginary money raiders have in their bank? Dave, are you the Raiders Financial Officer? Is that why they are in such trouble.
You cant' just make figures up Dave,
the real figure is 104,000, that is what the ABS puts it at, 104,000 people play your pathetic little sport of Rugby League
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:43 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
sydneyfc wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:Two of the four so-called biggest football codes in the country don't even have a team in the Nations capital, for shame and National my arse!
at this rate the waiders wont be around for too much longer if they cant keep up with rental payments
get the eviction notice ready

Been around longer than any a league club, have never been seriously looked at to move. Meanwhile your lot in its first decade (not even that) have lost 3 teams already. The central coast are fucked and by the looks of it newcastle are too, we all know the NZ side is about to fail again for a second time.
Hahahahahaah.
Look back at history you dopey khuunt and you'll see it's not only these clubs that have fallen, each few decades, a whole fucking sokka comp collapses and that's real history where at lest 3 times this stupid sport has failed before the current lot that have a near 50% failure rate to date.
Good luck you fuckwits running a comp with two Sydney clubs (for now aye Northern spirit), a Melbourne club and Brisbane with their massive 14k average if that. Perth are rocking and rolling like a drunk so they are not out of the woods either, and as for the SA team, no one cares about SA, I don't even think SA people do, they seem to constantly move elsewhere, so i guess the sokka lot ain't got long there either.
Happy days, AFL in the Southern States, RL in the Northern States and everything else a minor sport during the summer months.
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:47 pm
by King-Eliagh
post_hoc wrote:KE_liar, wrong again, or was that more lies, the ACL was played on Foxtel only so not available to all, only available to those with a Foxtel subscription AND the sports package LOL, so why do you keep lying, your name really suits you.
It was 47k right?

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:48 pm
by King-Eliagh
post_hoc wrote:actually the ABS data has different age brackets, and there are over 35's comps for Rugby League, whoops again more lies, gee KE_liar you really are having a bad day, lie after lie, you keep getting caught.
two lies in 1 post, man you are habitual.
Hopeless. I said over 50's ya lying tool. And the "different age brackets" does not counter my argument in the slightest.
You really are quite weak eh?

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:51 pm
by King-Eliagh
ParraEelsNRL wrote:sydneyfc wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:Two of the four so-called biggest football codes in the country don't even have a team in the Nations capital, for shame and National my arse!
at this rate the waiders wont be around for too much longer if they cant keep up with rental payments
get the eviction notice ready

Been around longer than any a league club, have never been seriously looked at to move. Meanwhile your lot in its first decade (not even that) have lost 3 teams already. The central coast are fucked and by the looks of it newcastle are too, we all know the NZ side is about to fail again for a second time.
Hahahahahaah.
Look back at history you dopey khuunt and you'll see it's not only these clubs that have fallen, each few decades, a whole fucking sokka comp collapses and that's real history where at lest 3 times this stupid sport has failed before the current lot that have a near 50% failure rate to date.
Good luck you fuckwits running a comp with two Sydney clubs (for now aye Northern spirit), a Melbourne club and Brisbane with their massive 14k average if that. Perth are rocking and rolling like a drunk so they are not out of the woods either, and as for the SA team, no one cares about SA, I don't even think SA people do, they seem to constantly move elsewhere, so i guess the sokka lot ain't got long there either.
Happy days, AFL in the Southern States, RL in the Northern States and everything else a minor sport during the summer months.
Superb historical analysis =D>
Posthoc common man, pickup yer game a bit dude.

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:54 pm
by post_hoc
KE_liar, nope you know that as well, so more lies, it is habitual for you isn't
ummm over 50's can play over 35's you idiot they are over 35. LOL God you are thick, older players wear different colored shorts I believe, the colour designates how much contact, I thought you would know that.
of course the age brackets do, if they were playing they would be counted,if the young adults were playing they would be counted. LOL BUT they are not playing, therefore they are not counted.
104,000 pathetic number, just pathetic, nation wide 104,000 playing
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:54 pm
by post_hoc
lol, pick up my game, you have been beaten from pillar to post all day, 104,000 how pathetic
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:00 pm
by King-Eliagh
Over 50s don't play because its too physically demanding. They simply don't. But go out to any park on a Saturday and watch the sooker over 35s

fat old blubber hacks puffin and wheezing and having a good old kick. Throw those poor buggers in an over35s RL team and they'd be buried alive
Just ave a geeze at this competitor, still goin strong, because he can

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:05 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I remember when the Northern spirit got 19k years ago and much like the ws derps, they were about to take over and be the biggest thing in Australia (these days it's Asia LOL LOL LOL), what happened to them?
Oh that's right, after they mouthed off for ages big noting themselves telling everyone that would listen how they were going to crush RL and having big owners like the Scottish lot, what happened?
Well they finally had a few loses, not many (well not like wooden spoon teams from other codes, they don't die each year they go crap on the pitch either liker when Parra, souths Western Bulldogs, St Kilda and co come last, they end up playing the next season), yet the sokka lot seem to fall into the abyss never to return that team but morph into something else 20 years later with all the same mouthing off and big noting and rich owners from big Euro clubs only to suffer the same consequences a few years later when the *fans suddenly get bored with it all..
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:59 pm
by sydneyfc
did someone say gold coast united
rip adelaide rams
rip perth reds
rip gold coast chargers
rip illawarra steelers
rip western magpies
rip northen eagles
rip north sydney bears
rip the original st george dragons
rip balmain tigers
you shall never be forgotten
~take care in nrl franchise heaven, you shall be missed~

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 6:03 pm
by Raiderdave
post_hoc wrote:lol, pick up my game, you have been beaten from pillar to post all day, 104,000 how pathetic
1.8 Million you stupid lying raider
Double greaseball in all its forms
3 times the derps & fumbles
Australias most played sport
A fact.

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 6:08 pm
by Raiderdave
sydneyfc wrote:did someone say gold coast united
rip adelaide rams
rip perth reds
rip gold coast chargers
rip illawarra steelers
rip western magpies
rip northen eagles
rip north sydney bears
rip the original st george dragons
rip balmain tigers
you shall never be forgotten
~take care in nrl franchise heaven, you shall be missed~

Every NSL club
&
Auckland
Gold Coast
Townsville
In the next few years
Jets
Mariners
Wellington
about 21 teams
&
They still cant outrate girls cricket
:_<>

:_<>
Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 6:12 pm
by sydneyfc
professional RL are ahead of professional football 9-3 in the race for folded franchises..
you win this one dave!

Re: National Rugby League is not National
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:01 pm
by Raiderdave
sydneyfc wrote:professional RL are ahead of professional football 9-3 in the race for folded franchises..
you win this one dave!

9 in 107 years for the RL
21 in 10 years for sooker
