Talking Footy

sydneyfc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

hardly. 50,000 people is still 50,000 people. If you stop comparing it to the AFL for five seconds, the NRLs crowds are quite reasonable

sure for the intelligent ones among us who accept the nrl as a distant second among the domestic leagues in this country

Soccer anyone?

We are that disconnected with the game we don't even call
It by its correct name

And by the way, when tha fukk are u actually going to talk about the code u follow sydfc ya dipshit?

King-Eliagh wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

hardly. 50,000 people is still 50,000 people. If you stop comparing it to the AFL for five seconds, the NRLs crowds are quite reasonable

sure for the intelligent ones among us who accept the nrl as a distant second among the domestic leagues in this country

Soccer anyone?

We are that disconnected with the game we don't even call
It by its correct name

And by the way, when tha fukk are u actually going to talk about the code u follow sydfc ya dipshit?

Bit hard for him with his tongue firmly wedged up the clacker of Derpball fans.
That happens when your sport is insignificant .

Not wrong there aflcrap. His tongue is def wedged.

Poor fraudFC

Such a phony

King-Eliagh wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

hardly. 50,000 people is still 50,000 people. If you stop comparing it to the AFL for five seconds, the NRLs crowds are quite reasonable

sure for the intelligent ones among us who accept the nrl as a distant second among the domestic leagues in this country

Soccer anyone?

We are that disconnected with the game we don't even call
It by its correct name

And by the way, when tha fukk are u actually going to talk about the code u follow sydfc ya dipshit?

easy, check my post history. there's plenty for you to go through

don't get all angry just because your jimmies get rustled every time i post here. you and eelsy seem to go all red in the face after reading my factual evidence - that is something that can be attended to by practicing deep breathe exercises till you become more comfortable

and puuuullleeasse, stay on topic homie! you're crowds all finals have been atrocious. no matter how many times you sprinkle a turd with glitter it will always be a turd....case and point

Yet more people watched the Rugby League games.

A Lot more.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Yet more people watched the Rugby League games.

A Lot more.

then make a thread dedicated to the tv ratings (if that really happened)

this is a thread to discuss your crowds for the finals which have been an abomination for a sport that calls itself #1 in the country

tone it down a bit... be a tad more realistic and you would be fine...but noooooo. it's all 80k sell outs and 70m in da bank out of your camp

bless you guys though, this is why i love coming on here

leagueiscrap wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

hardly. 50,000 people is still 50,000 people. If you stop comparing it to the AFL for five seconds, the NRLs crowds are quite reasonable

the mod trying to be fair and not come across as bias

the crowd was shit, they got more last year.
to what the bumsniffers tell us their gsme is number 1
this was going to be a sell out 80k,
discount tickets of $20 per person $ $50 per family of 4 100 plus years of history the best side of the NRL season the roosters, vs the biggest side south sydney, with the highest membership & crowd average of the H&A season.
their side playing for a spot on the GF being played in Australia largest capital city of Shitney 4.5 million!
and this is all that bothered to show up.


all of those invisible fans out there in TV land, failed to show up again
the game of NRL is in big trouble

$20 tickets??? point me to them and i woulda saved a lot of money.

me and my mates, with student concessions and the 'rushhour' promo discount, got the family tickets for $95 because they dont check if you're a kid or not, to save money.

crowds were okay, but with two sydney finals 100k between them is probably about right as the neutrals are split. People expecting 70k were off their heads, roosters and panthers are small sydney clubs. The other 70k crowds had big crowd pullers like the dragons, dogs, eels, tigers etc.

110k would have been a good aggregate, but 100k is fine.

You idiot, the NRL had the biggest crowd in Sydney, they also had the biggest ratings NATION WIDE :_<>

Edit, that was to the sokka boy

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You idiot, the NRL had the biggest crowd in Sydney, they also had the biggest ratings NATION WIDE :_<>

Edit, that was to the sokka boy

you creeped over the line vs the swans prelim in your supposed heartland

and couldn't even beat an a-league all star friendly match...unable to sell out the SFS at any point of the season despite playing there over 25 times this season(including finals matches)...something the a-league did twice

....international matches that couldn't draw a cow vs socceroo and wallabie matches that squashed the kangaroos into oblivion

competition wide revenue lagging behind the AFL, memberships, averages in general....all behind the AFL

nationwide ratings that are barely infront of the AFL counterparts(and that's still yet to be confirmed)

none of this points to you being an irrefutable #1 at all...what it does say is that you are a solid #2...so be happy

sydneyfc wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You idiot, the NRL had the biggest crowd in Sydney, they also had the biggest ratings NATION WIDE :_<>

Edit, that was to the sokka boy

you creeped over the line vs the swans prelim in your supposed heartland

and couldn't even beat an a-league all star friendly match...unable to sell out the SFS at any point of the season despite playing there over 25 times this season(including finals matches)...something the a-league did twice

....international matches that couldn't draw a cow vs socceroo and wallabie matches that squashed the kangaroos into oblivion

competition wide revenue lagging behind the AFL, memberships, averages in general....all behind the AFL

nationwide ratings that are barely infront of the AFL counterparts(and that's still yet to be confirmed)

none of this points to you being an irrefutable #1 at all...what it does say is that you are a solid #2...so be happy

Im a supposed Sokka fan yet all I can talk about is AFL this AFL that.


AFL did this AFL did that.

Pull your tongue out of the fumble boys clacker & talk up your own sport which is a long long way behind RL

Doesnt make his points any less valid though

AFLcrap1 wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You idiot, the NRL had the biggest crowd in Sydney, they also had the biggest ratings NATION WIDE :_<>

Edit, that was to the sokka boy

you creeped over the line vs the swans prelim in your supposed heartland

and couldn't even beat an a-league all star friendly match...unable to sell out the SFS at any point of the season despite playing there over 25 times this season(including finals matches)...something the a-league did twice

....international matches that couldn't draw a cow vs socceroo and wallabie matches that squashed the kangaroos into oblivion

competition wide revenue lagging behind the AFL, memberships, averages in general....all behind the AFL

nationwide ratings that are barely infront of the AFL counterparts(and that's still yet to be confirmed)

none of this points to you being an irrefutable #1 at all...what it does say is that you are a solid #2...so be happy

Im a supposed Sokka fan yet all I can talk about is AFL this AFL that.


AFL did this AFL did that.

Pull your tongue out of the fumble boys clacker & talk up your own sport which is a long long way behind RL

thx for not denying anything that i said, guess i can assume you agree with me on every point

Lol you are an arse kissing look at me look at me sokka boy.
& no I don't agree with anything you post.
In your deluded world 16k is more than 20 K.

I will stick with reality thank you.