Talking Footy

sydneyfc wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

the nsl was an amateur/semi pro competition -!

Hmmm

But but

But but but
But but

:_<>

dont backtrack now! you got caught out comparing apples to oranges!

if you want to play that game then lets compare the NSL's avg attendance vs the jim beam cup :D

otherwise hush little one

and puuuuulleeease! RL can only DREAM of getting 50k to a kangyroos match

the socceroos - australia's premier international sporting brand both in terms of crowds, sponsors and tv interest- has an average attendance for the last 2 years in australia of 47,800 - more than double the star studded kangyroos who sell tickets at a limp $8-12 per head

47800

Wow

The qld maroons & nsw blues have an
Average 76000 in sydney
52000 in brisbane
& 54000 in melbourne

Over the last 2 years the average in sydney is
82500


So Tell yr story walking ... or in yr case.. bouncing

You fuckwit

Funny, all the record crowds at all the old grounds, scg, Gabba and so on in NSW and qld all belong to the Kangaroos.

Thanks for reminding everyone soccerboy.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Funny, all the record crowds at all the old grounds, scg, Gabba and so on in NSW and qld all belong to the Kangaroos.

Thanks for reminding everyone soccerboy.

the socceroos don't play at outdated oval stadiums unless its the mcg or the etihad(where the stands are brought in)

only a backwater international team would try to play on an oval pitch when they play a rectangular game

congrats on holding a ground record from 1942!

lets try to keep up with reality though where your kangykangaroos are nothing more than a joke

think bigger dave! more people in the US watched the socceroos(a random foreign country!) at the world cup than the entire origin viewership this year! nuff nuffs and nobodies im 'fraid!

sydneyfc wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

there were never any plans for the new stadium to have 45 or even 40K seats
it was a leading question from a dickhead journalist.
the stadium will have 24K permanent seats with a facility to bring in another 8K at one end for larger drawing games at the venue
this end will be vacant when not being used .. it will have a roof , but it will not be retractable.

it will be a cracking little venue for rectangle sports
& a fumbles & derps free zone which is just dandy

Raiders crowds to double on average when its built & they're playing there in 2020
with ... ooooh
3... 30K sellouts in the first year
whooo hoooooooo

love the optimism

from 7k crowds to 30k, god bless you dave!

as for the 72 million rubbish, again, we all know that's fake! your club is poor dave and there's no 2 ways around it i'm afraid! as the article suggest your lot would struggle to pay rent and the fact remains you cant attract any decent players to play for you which suggests you don't have a)the money, b)the infrastructure, c)you're just a tiny club in general!

Hey soccer boy, you think a poor club offers million solar contracts? Think again

Jackyboy wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

there were never any plans for the new stadium to have 45 or even 40K seats
it was a leading question from a dickhead journalist.
the stadium will have 24K permanent seats with a facility to bring in another 8K at one end for larger drawing games at the venue
this end will be vacant when not being used .. it will have a roof , but it will not be retractable.

it will be a cracking little venue for rectangle sports
& a fumbles & derps free zone which is just dandy

Raiders crowds to double on average when its built & they're playing there in 2020
with ... ooooh
3... 30K sellouts in the first year
whooo hoooooooo

love the optimism

from 7k crowds to 30k, god bless you dave!

as for the 72 million rubbish, again, we all know that's fake! your club is poor dave and there's no 2 ways around it i'm afraid! as the article suggest your lot would struggle to pay rent and the fact remains you cant attract any decent players to play for you which suggests you don't have a)the money, b)the infrastructure, c)you're just a tiny club in general!

Hey soccer boy, you think a poor club offers million solar contracts? Think again

if your club was so rich they would be attracting a lot better players than they have been for the last decade or more. nevermind the fact you cant offer decent money to your best players who pack up and leave as soon as they get some interest from other clubs

no wonder no one can take your club seriously, you've been playing with your toy solar panels while my club toured indonesia, japan, italy, new zealand all in the last couple of years

Whether or not they want to play for us or not is irrelevant idiot, but the money is there, and eventually someone will go, we've already got 3 new signings for next year and more to come

sydneyfc wrote:

Jackyboy wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

there were never any plans for the new stadium to have 45 or even 40K seats
it was a leading question from a dickhead journalist.
the stadium will have 24K permanent seats with a facility to bring in another 8K at one end for larger drawing games at the venue
this end will be vacant when not being used .. it will have a roof , but it will not be retractable.

it will be a cracking little venue for rectangle sports
& a fumbles & derps free zone which is just dandy

Raiders crowds to double on average when its built & they're playing there in 2020
with ... ooooh
3... 30K sellouts in the first year
whooo hoooooooo

love the optimism

from 7k crowds to 30k, god bless you dave!

as for the 72 million rubbish, again, we all know that's fake! your club is poor dave and there's no 2 ways around it i'm afraid! as the article suggest your lot would struggle to pay rent and the fact remains you cant attract any decent players to play for you which suggests you don't have a)the money, b)the infrastructure, c)you're just a tiny club in general!

Hey soccer boy, you think a poor club offers million solar contracts? Think again

if your club was so rich they would be attracting a lot better players than they have been for the last decade or more. nevermind the fact you cant offer decent money to your best players who pack up and leave as soon as they get some interest from other clubs

no wonder no one can take your club seriously, you've been playing with your toy solar panels while my club toured indonesia, japan, italy, new zealand all in the last couple of years

I don't see your point? The truth is that soccer is one of the most popular sports on earth, I'm not denying that. What do you expect league to do? Go to China and play a second div team? It is also a fact that league and union are more popular in the north uk, south France, South Africa, Australia New Zealand and the pacific from the top oft head

more popular than what?

Then soccer/football

sydneyfc wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Funny, all the record crowds at all the old grounds, scg, Gabba and so on in NSW and qld all belong to the Kangaroos.

Thanks for reminding everyone soccerboy.

the socceroos don't play at outdated oval stadiums unless its the mcg or the etihad(where the stands are brought in)

!

:_<> :_<> :_<>

but but but


NSW Blues
QLD Maroons>>>>>> the Sookerwho's

Jackyboy wrote:

Then soccer/football

1) lol! not even close! there are 7 ligue 1(french top division of soccer) clubs in southern france including the biggest club in the country of any code- marseille. all of them dwarf the rugby clubs in terms of attendances, sponsorship, viewership

2)same with rugby league in northern england

if you think tiny clubs like the wigan warriors or st helens that struggle to draw 10k a game are even close to being as big as northern soccer clubs like manchester united, liverpool, man city, newcastle united who all sell out 60k seaters week in week out and also have a $9 billion tv deal then you are completely delusional! your rugby league clubs play in small boutique stadiums and share them with 3rd/4th division soccer clubs, the avg attendance for the union competition and the super league are atrocious vs the premier league. even the second division of english soccer dwarfs the rugby leagues in the uk

3)soccer is the national sport of south africa

the only places on the planet where league+union together are defnitely more popular than soccer is NSW, QLD, ACT, NZ, PNG and those random pacific islands. it's a footnote everywhere else

having a presence in the north of UK and south of france is not the same as being more popular than another code. unions popularity in the south of france is essentially identical to soccers popularity in brisbane - it exists but is still behind another code or code(s)

sydneyfc wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Funny, all the record crowds at all the old grounds, scg, Gabba and so on in NSW and qld all belong to the Kangaroos.

Thanks for reminding everyone soccerboy.

the socceroos don't play at outdated oval stadiums unless its the mcg or the etihad(where the stands are brought in)

only a backwater international team would try to play on an oval pitch when they play a rectangular game

congrats on holding a ground record from 1942!

lets try to keep up with reality though where your kangykangaroos are nothing more than a joke

think bigger dave! more people in the US watched the socceroos(a random foreign country!) at the world cup than the entire origin viewership this year! nuff nuffs and nobodies im 'fraid!

Hey dickhead, where did the sokkawhos play before the SFS, Suncorp, ANZ, Parramatta and so on all got built?

Remember dickhead, some of these stadiums are less than 20 years old.

Are you saying soccer only got into aus in the last 10 years my lying little pooffy sokka loon?




Not a single crowd record for anywhere bar records for the lowest attended pro sporting events in Australian history.

Gold Coast, North Qld, ha, you could add all their crowds together for the season they last had and they still wouldn't reach the numbers the shithouse Titans get in ONE FUCKING WEEK.

The Sokkawhos according to our lying little sokkaHoon have only just arrived here in Aus, yet I can remember the sokkawhos playing out here for years in front of fuck all.

Nup, all crowd records for big crowds in Aus belong to Rugby League, Rugby Union, Australian Rules Football, Cricket and Tennis.

Your lot are nowhere to be seen outside a WC when they manage to pay another nation off for the privilege of attending

sydneyfc wrote:

Jackyboy wrote:

Then soccer/football

1) lol! not even close! there are 7 ligue 1(french top division of soccer) clubs in southern france including the biggest club in the country of any code- marseille. all of them dwarf the rugby clubs in terms of attendances, sponsorship, viewership

2)same with rugby league in northern england

if you think tiny clubs like the wigan warriors or st helens that struggle to draw 10k a game are even close to being as big as northern soccer clubs like manchester united, liverpool, man city, newcastle united who all sell out 60k seaters week in week out and also have a $9 billion tv deal then you are completely delusional! your rugby league clubs play in small boutique stadiums and share them with 3rd/4th division soccer clubs, the avg attendance for the union competition and the super league are atrocious vs the premier league. even the second division of english soccer dwarfs the rugby leagues in the uk

3)soccer is the national sport of south africa

the only places on the planet where league+union together are defnitely more popular than soccer is NSW, QLD, ACT, NZ, PNG and those random pacific islands. it's a footnote everywhere else

having a presence in the north of UK and south of france is not the same as being more popular than another code. unions popularity in the south of france is essentially identical to soccers popularity in brisbane - it exists but is still behind another code or code(s)

More lies, you don't know your own country let alone anyone elses.

Oh, and when was the last time Wigan averaged under 10k please know all?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

Jackyboy wrote:

Then soccer/football

1) lol! not even close! there are 7 ligue 1(french top division of soccer) clubs in southern france including the biggest club in the country of any code- marseille. all of them dwarf the rugby clubs in terms of attendances, sponsorship, viewership

2)same with rugby league in northern england

if you think tiny clubs like the wigan warriors or st helens that struggle to draw 10k a game are even close to being as big as northern soccer clubs like manchester united, liverpool, man city, newcastle united who all sell out 60k seaters week in week out and also have a $9 billion tv deal then you are completely delusional! your rugby league clubs play in small boutique stadiums and share them with 3rd/4th division soccer clubs, the avg attendance for the union competition and the super league are atrocious vs the premier league. even the second division of english soccer dwarfs the rugby leagues in the uk

3)soccer is the national sport of south africa

the only places on the planet where league+union together are defnitely more popular than soccer is NSW, QLD, ACT, NZ, PNG and those random pacific islands. it's a footnote everywhere else

having a presence in the north of UK and south of france is not the same as being more popular than another code. unions popularity in the south of france is essentially identical to soccers popularity in brisbane - it exists but is still behind another code or code(s)

More lies, you don't know your own country let alone anyone elses.

Oh, and when was the last time Wigan averaged under 10k please know all?

what they average is irrelevant. the fact they don't average 20k when they are surrounded by soccer clubs that average up to 3x as much as them is enough to say that rugby league is nothing but backwater - even in northern england - a supposed heartland for you RL nuffies

and if soccer was irrelevant 10 years ago and is now at the forefrunt....THAT GROWTH BABY!

The average is what now in Wigan?

You stated it liar.


Oh, and sokka is still irrelevant out here, their tv deal is shit, and the average crowd for the a league is a touch over 10k played in summer to get away from the big boys.

WSW will be gone in no time, another northern spirit, they won't be able to gift them a free run this year or the other clubs will start to kick up a stink. the only way is down.