Talking Footy

cos789 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

You know very well what I mean ,

I'd help if you spoke English.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

A VICTORIAN AFL obsessed person gets a job at a NSW school.
He ONLY allows ONE sport..his beloved AFL.

So what are the details?

Simple question & you deflected again..

You're a fecking absolute moron who cannot grasp English comprehension.
All over Australia Headmasters determine what sports will and wont be played due to a number of factors - cost, resources, offers, interest, competition etc.
You are implying that one decision was unjustified.
Well supply the details or shut up and sook somewhere else.

ATM all we know it is a school in NSW with an ex-Victorian headmaster. (Note the use use of "ex" in this particular case)
Is it a primary or high school?
Regional or city?
Private or government?
Is it an Auskick program, intra-school or inter-school?

AFLcrap1 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

You know very well what I mean ,

I'd help if you spoke English.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

A VICTORIAN AFL obsessed person gets a job at a NSW school.
He ONLY allows ONE sport..his beloved AFL.

So what are the details?

Simple question & you deflected again..

You're a fecking absolute moron who cannot grasp English comprehension.
All over Australia Headmasters determine what sports will and wont be played due to a number of factors - cost, resources, offers, interest, competition etc.
You are implying that one decision was unjustified.
Well supply the details or shut up and sook somewhere else.

ATM all we know it is a school in NSW with an ex-Victorian headmaster. (Note the use use of "ex" in this particular case)
Is it a primary or high school?
Regional or city?
Private or government?
Is it an Auskick program, intra-school or inter-school?

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Stick to telling lies about international derpball.
You are way out of your depth in here.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

piesman2011 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

The headmaster at my children's school (from Victoria) is a mad AFL fan and has been trying to get all kids into AFL, in one way or another for the last few years without much success. So how does one cunning AFL diehard get around this you may ask, he enforces it.

Here is how it panned out this year so far.
Term 1 - Auskick,
Term 2 - The headmaster arranges more AFL flavoured activities in PE, coupled with a convenient visit from some AFL players. This followed by some friendly encouragement to play it for interschool sport next term on assembly etc.

My young bloke was saying he wanted to give it a go. Much to my disgust, but I thought, it is his decision, so give it a go.That was until I heard today that the above has been leading to this. Both my daughter and son only have two options for interschool sport (this hasn't been communicated to loudly to parents mind you). First Drama, second AFL.

So if you want to play any sport that involves a ball next term boys and girls, it has to be AFL says headmaster Hitler . This is up there with one of the most pathetic, manipulative things I think I have seen in my life. :-+

I am now considering not letting him play AFL as I am disgusted by how manipulative it is.

I would like some more clarification before I give my point of view.

It is a once off game? A series of games? The only sporting activity for the rest of the year?
Is it the headmaster calling the shots? Quite often it is the sports teachers or head of sport who call the shots on this kind of thing. If its interschool sport they also have the option of doing a normal school day ( or at least I assume).

Dogs wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

The headmaster at my children's school (from Victoria) is a mad AFL fan and has been trying to get all kids into AFL, in one way or another for the last few years without much success. So how does one cunning AFL diehard get around this you may ask, he enforces it.

Here is how it panned out this year so far.
Term 1 - Auskick,
Term 2 - The headmaster arranges more AFL flavoured activities in PE, coupled with a convenient visit from some AFL players. This followed by some friendly encouragement to play it for interschool sport next term on assembly etc.

My young bloke was saying he wanted to give it a go. Much to my disgust, but I thought, it is his decision, so give it a go.That was until I heard today that the above has been leading to this. Both my daughter and son only have two options for interschool sport (this hasn't been communicated to loudly to parents mind you). First Drama, second AFL.

So if you want to play any sport that involves a ball next term boys and girls, it has to be AFL says headmaster Hitler . This is up there with one of the most pathetic, manipulative things I think I have seen in my life. :-+

I am now considering not letting him play AFL as I am disgusted by how manipulative it is.

I would like some more clarification before I give my point of view.

It is a once off game? A series of games? The only sporting activity for the rest of the year?
Is it the headmaster calling the shots? Quite often it is the sports teachers or head of sport who call the shots on this kind of thing. If its interschool sport they also have the option of doing a normal school day ( or at least I assume).

OK got the note home asking us for our normal contribution to pay for bus trips etc and its AFL or Drama.

This is a disgrace and much to my sons discuss, he will be doing drama as this is a disgrace

cos789 wrote:

Parafeelup always goes the man when he can't win an argument

Phelpsy wrote:

Why not give him a go at Aussie rules ? Yes, it is a disgrace but only drama was offered as well?

cos789 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

The headmaster at my children's school (from Victoria) is a mad AFL fan and has been trying to get all kids into AFL, in one way or another for the last few years without much success. So how does one cunning AFL diehard get around this you may ask, he enforces it.

Here is how it panned out this year so far.
Term 1 - Auskick,
Term 2 - The headmaster arranges more AFL flavoured activities in PE, coupled with a convenient visit from some AFL players. This followed by some friendly encouragement to play it for interschool sport next term on assembly etc.

My young bloke was saying he wanted to give it a go. Much to my disgust, but I thought, it is his decision, so give it a go.That was until I heard today that the above has been leading to this. Both my daughter and son only have two options for interschool sport (this hasn't been communicated to loudly to parents mind you). First Drama, second AFL.

So if you want to play any sport that involves a ball next term boys and girls, it has to be AFL says headmaster Hitler . This is up there with one of the most pathetic, manipulative things I think I have seen in my life. :-+

I am now considering not letting him play AFL as I am disgusted by how manipulative it is.

I would like some more clarification before I give my point of view.

It is a once off game? A series of games? The only sporting activity for the rest of the year?
Is it the headmaster calling the shots? Quite often it is the sports teachers or head of sport who call the shots on this kind of thing. If its interschool sport they also have the option of doing a normal school day ( or at least I assume).

OK got the note home asking us for our normal contribution to pay for bus trips etc and its AFL or Drama.

This is a disgrace and much to my sons discuss, he will be doing drama as this is a disgrace

Seems this is one-speciallity sort of thing not interschool sports. i.e. Auskick

So what interschool sports are available???

Phelpsy wrote:

Problem is there just isn't the presence of rl in Victoria for that to happen. It would be like him trying to enforce gridiron or Gaelic football. Whilst I agree with you re choice, the fact he can do this is a reflection of the presence of Aussie rules on the area.