Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

100k huh?

Like to see it proved seeing as you don't get a breakdown of Viewers only in Sydney on Pay TV, but you flogs keep pretending they do, it's quite funny esp seeing as the FTA audience is usually below 50k.

yeah, just keep adding all those viewers from regionals and other capital cities to the swans Pay TV figures.

Loons

They rated 80k on FTA last week, with a record 370k on fox. Are you claiming less than 20k of 370k were from Sydney? Lol

& that was their biggest audience of the year
& up against no NRL on FTA in Sydney

as Parra said
it would have been closer to 50K normally .... telle tubbie ratings

again
keep up dopey :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Didn't I just show you the AFL rated higher than any other program on a secondary channel in Sydney? Back in your box flog

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

That's more people than watch them on TV in Sydney, well done.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

too true

is there any team on the planet , that claims to be numb 1
yet is watched by less people on TV then their attendances or their membership numbers :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


Swines
only ahead of the Midgets & maybe the waratards for interest in NSW :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Yes the snot green dole Bludging Braiders!!! Hahaha oh the pain pissy pants!

ah no
the Raiders are watched by 4 times the number the Swines are in NSW .... hell , even NZ's team is far more popular
try again
you filthy spineless flea

Then was wookies break down have them SECOND last NATIONALLY - you dole Bludging, dog rooting piss soaked moron!!! Hahaha priceless!

then was wookies break down have them.....................





>


:_<> :_<> :_<>



wow
you're a word smith aren't you

you have serious issues
lying about serving
uneducated
wanting to fight people


just generally a real flea aren't you ? :_<> :_<> :_<>

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How many Victorians would have watched their team?

When the storm get 300k on Pay TV, do you see RL fans saying they rated 300k in Melbourne?

No you don't, you don't hear shit because no one has the figures.

Can you show me where I said 300k were from Sydney? Are you really that fking illiterate? I said 100k including 80k from FTA. This would make the pay tv figure 20k, about 5% of the audience. Damn low given the game involved Sydney who have 40k members living in Sydney and the game was in Melbourne

someone once said the moon is made of cheese, some people believed it and some still do to this day even though man has walked on said moon instead of eating it.

Proof or gtfo, until you can prove it, stop taking liberties with whatever you think you can to make your precious AFL look bigger.

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

100k huh?

Like to see it proved seeing as you don't get a breakdown of Viewers only in Sydney on Pay TV, but you flogs keep pretending they do, it's quite funny esp seeing as the FTA audience is usually below 50k.

yeah, just keep adding all those viewers from regionals and other capital cities to the swans Pay TV figures.

Loons

They rated 80k on FTA last week, with a record 370k on fox. Are you claiming less than 20k of 370k were from Sydney? Lol

& that was their biggest audience of the year
& up against no NRL on FTA in Sydney

as Parra said
it would have been closer to 50K normally .... telle tubbie ratings

again
keep up dopey :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Didn't I just show you the AFL rated higher than any other program on a secondary channel in Sydney? Back in your box flog

:_<> :_<>

yeah sure they did wanker

telle tubbie ratings for the Swines
deal with it you deluded brain washed fuckstick

Proof would be nice, well because I would actually be very interested in all of this, and hey, for all we know all 300k could have watched the swans on pay TV in Sydney, for all we know again, only 2k might have, so until we have real figures, I suggest we don't use rubbery so called facts.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How many Victorians would have watched their team?

When the storm get 300k on Pay TV, do you see RL fans saying they rated 300k in Melbourne?

No you don't, you don't hear shit because no one has the figures.

Can you show me where I said 300k were from Sydney? Are you really that fking illiterate? I said 100k including 80k from FTA. This would make the pay tv figure 20k, about 5% of the audience. Damn low given the game involved Sydney who have 40k members living in Sydney and the game was in Melbourne

someone once said the moon is made of cheese, some people believed it and some still do to this day even though man has walked on said moon instead of eating it.

Proof or gtfo, until you can prove it, stop taking liberties with whatever you think you can to make your precious AFL look bigger.

So you seriously think an audience of 370k wouldn't have involved 20k from the city with the ladder leader in the game. The same city with the highest STV subscription rates in the country. The city with 35k baked on fans who attend games week after week, and who would have been watching their team interstate.

Yeah, keep drinking the kool aid champ

Well yes considering only 80k watched them for Free, derp.

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

That's more people than watch them on TV in Sydney, well done.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

too true

is there any team on the planet , that claims to be numb 1
yet is watched by less people on TV then their attendances or their membership numbers :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


Swines
only ahead of the Midgets & maybe the waratards for interest in NSW :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Yes the snot green dole Bludging Braiders!!! Hahaha oh the pain pissy pants!

ah no
the Raiders are watched by 4 times the number the Swines are in NSW .... hell , even NZ's team is far more popular
try again
you filthy spineless flea

Then was wookies break down have them SECOND last NATIONALLY - you dole Bludging, dog rooting piss soaked moron!!! Hahaha priceless!

then was wookies break down have them.....................





>


:_<> :_<> :_<>



wow
you're a word smith aren't you

you have serious issues
lying about serving
uneducated
wanting to fight people


just generally a real flea aren't you ? :_<> :_<> :_<>

Is that the best yah got you piss sodden urine drinking dole bludger - have you noticed that I couldn't care less what you believe - and wasn't it KE only recently asked me to have a bout again - fuck your stupid - if only knew who I am and what my credentials are but I know who you are - a dole Bludging urine drinking fuck stick!!!! Who follows a pathetic shit club - a true loser!!!!! Hahaha your fucking in real pain now and all those delusions of yours are unravelling aren't they pissy pants - what a tool!

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

100k huh?

Like to see it proved seeing as you don't get a breakdown of Viewers only in Sydney on Pay TV, but you flogs keep pretending they do, it's quite funny esp seeing as the FTA audience is usually below 50k.

yeah, just keep adding all those viewers from regionals and other capital cities to the swans Pay TV figures.

Loons

They rated 80k on FTA last week, with a record 370k on fox. Are you claiming less than 20k of 370k were from Sydney? Lol

& that was their biggest audience of the year
& up against no NRL on FTA in Sydney

as Parra said
it would have been closer to 50K normally .... telle tubbie ratings

again
keep up dopey :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Didn't I just show you the AFL rated higher than any other program on a secondary channel in Sydney? Back in your box flog

:_<> :_<>

yeah sure they did wanker

telle tubbie ratings for the Swines
deal with it you deluded brain washed fuckstick

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2014/07/sat ... -2014.html

Hmmm, seems the only thing to beat the swans on secondary channels in Sydney was the Commonwealth games. Add the foxtel ratings and the Swans would have outrated all other programs on secondary channels in Sydney.

See ya pissy pants

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Well yes considering only 80k watched them for Free, derp.

80k is near the top for ANY programs on secondary digital channels in one city

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

That's more people than watch them on TV in Sydney, well done.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

too true

is there any team on the planet , that claims to be numb 1
yet is watched by less people on TV then their attendances or their membership numbers :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


Swines
only ahead of the Midgets & maybe the waratards for interest in NSW :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Yes the snot green dole Bludging Braiders!!! Hahaha oh the pain pissy pants!

ah no
the Raiders are watched by 4 times the number the Swines are in NSW .... hell , even NZ's team is far more popular
try again
you filthy spineless flea

Then was wookies break down have them SECOND last NATIONALLY - you dole Bludging, dog rooting piss soaked moron!!! Hahaha priceless!

then was wookies break down have them.....................





>


:_<> :_<> :_<>



wow
you're a word smith aren't you

you have serious issues
lying about serving
uneducated
wanting to fight people


just generally a real flea aren't you ? :_<> :_<> :_<>

Is that the best yah got you piss sodden urine drinking dole bludger - have you noticed that I couldn't care less what you believe - and wasn't it KE only recently asked me to have a bout again - fuck your stupid - if only knew who I am and what my credentials are but I know who you are - a dole Bludging urine drinking fuck stick!!!! Who follows a pathetic shit club - a true loser!!!!! Hahaha your fucking in real pain now and all those delusions of yours are unravelling aren't they pissy pants - what a tool!

Rambo just won the INTERNET.

Boasting about how important you are .
Jesus you are a flog.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

That's more people than watch them on TV in Sydney, well done.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

too true

is there any team on the planet , that claims to be numb 1
yet is watched by less people on TV then their attendances or their membership numbers :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


Swines
only ahead of the Midgets & maybe the waratards for interest in NSW :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Yes the snot green dole Bludging Braiders!!! Hahaha oh the pain pissy pants!

ah no
the Raiders are watched by 4 times the number the Swines are in NSW .... hell , even NZ's team is far more popular
try again
you filthy spineless flea

Then was wookies break down have them SECOND last NATIONALLY - you dole Bludging, dog rooting piss soaked moron!!! Hahaha priceless!

then was wookies break down have them.....................





>


:_<> :_<> :_<>



wow
you're a word smith aren't you

you have serious issues
lying about serving
uneducated
wanting to fight people


just generally a real flea aren't you ? :_<> :_<> :_<>

Is that the best yah got you piss sodden urine drinking dole bludger - have you noticed that I couldn't care less what you believe - and wasn't it KE only recently asked me to have a bout again - fuck your stupid - if only knew who I am and what my credentials are but I know who you are - a dole Bludging urine drinking fuck stick!!!! Who follows a pathetic shit club - a true loser!!!!! Hahaha your fucking in real pain now and all those delusions of yours are unravelling aren't they pissy pants - what a tool!

Rambo just won the INTERNET.

Boasting about how important you are .
Jesus you are a flog.

Obviously pissy pants loyal dog barks - how long did it take you to come up with that??? Did pissy pants pm you to get online????? How about you stick to what you know best calling people liars and deflecting - this thread is about 40k Swans members - larger than ANY NRL club!!!! Well done Swans!!!

Yes sir .
I will do what you say.
You are a very important person.
& we know how you like to lie about who you are & what you do.

Fuckhead.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Yes sir .
I will do what you say.
You are a very important person.
& we know how you like to lie about who you are & what you do.

Fuckhead.

Bark bark - psychocrapper chimes in !

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Yes sir .
I will do what you say.
You are a very important person.
& we know how you like to lie about who you are & what you do.

Fuckhead.

Bark bark - psychocrapper chimes in !

:_<> :_<> :_<>

- if only knew who I am and what my credentials are

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>