Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.

Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.

Moron

:**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****

Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.

That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.

So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.

. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.

>



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

jesus
its a disease with this lot
they are beyond any rational thought ...... they stand there like indoctrinated cult followers repeating the mantra

its not cheating ommmmmmm
its not cheating oommmmmmm
its to level the playing field ommmmmmmm
its to level the playing field oommmmmmmmmm




have another sip of the cool aide fuckwit

you'd better stop dave, other wise this might happen again

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.

Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.

Moron

:**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****

Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.

That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.

So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.

. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.

>



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

jesus
its a disease with this lot
they are beyond any rational thought ...... they stand there like indoctrinated cult followers repeating the mantra

its not cheating ommmmmmm
its not cheating oommmmmmm
its to level the playing field ommmmmmmm
its to level the playing field oommmmmmmmmm




have another sip of the cool aide fuckwit

Suck it up chump, despite your misgivings about th AFL competition, it's mnay many times bigger than the NRL

Want a tissue?

:_<> :_<> :_<>
what page is that crap on the official VFL bible you brain washed fucktard ?


ommmmmmmmmmm



ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


hmmmmmm
this cool aide tastes funny >

More like what freely available information are you avoiding? :_<>

2 minutes on the Internet is all that's required to see the AFL have a substantial advantage in crowds, revenue, memberships, national footprint, participation numbers, etc etc. about the only the the NRL win at is despicable acts :_<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.

Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.

Moron

:**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****

Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.

That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.

So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.

It doesn't matter what the AFL or anyone else wanted. You can't pack a club full of kids and expect them to be a finals contender before theyve matured. The loss of senior players makes a massive difference to on field leadership. They'll dominate for years, but not until they're ready.

Of course it's not a coincidence that expansion clubs get an advantage. The "go home" factor has drawn many a player back to their home state to be with their friends and family. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.

Oh jesus do you really believe that.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Tell me stupid.

How long is the Swans considered an EXPANSION team?.

You tards are so brainwashed its hysterical.

Why are you so fixated what and how the AFL manage their comp?????? I thought your interest is RL - if the AFL and it's clubs have an issue then so be it - how that effects you I don't know - looking at the AFL ladder there is only 1 team from the Northern states in there if there was so much AFL manipulation wouldn't they all be there - I seem to remember the Storm got gifted many senior players when they came into the comp and have since been found guilty of cheating - The Swans however have played by the rules - me thinks the ONLY brainwashed people here are you and RD at least KE will give AFL a go - you however are way too narrow minded to even consider such a thing!!!

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.

Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.

Moron

:**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****

Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.

That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.

So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.

It doesn't matter what the AFL or anyone else wanted. You can't pack a club full of kids and expect them to be a finals contender before theyve matured. The loss of senior players makes a massive difference to on field leadership. They'll dominate for years, but not until they're ready.

Of course it's not a coincidence that expansion clubs get an advantage. The "go home" factor has drawn many a player back to their home state to be with their friends and family. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.

Oh jesus do you really believe that.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Tell me stupid.

How long is the Swans considered an EXPANSION team?.

You tards are so brainwashed its hysterical.

Why are you so fixated what and how the AFL manage their comp?????? I thought your interest is RL - if the AFL and it's clubs have an issue then so be it - how that effects you I don't know - looking at the AFL ladder there is only 1 team from the Northern states in there if there was so much AFL manipulation wouldn't they all be there - I seem to remember the Storm got gifted many senior players when they came into the comp and have since been found guilty of cheating - The Swans however have played by the rules - me thinks the ONLY brainwashed people here are you and RD at least KE will give AFL a go - you however are way too narrow minded to even consider such a thing!!!

So much derp in One small post.


Any time Derpball is shown up as the manipulated compromised comp it is ,all we get is the standard deflection..

Why are you so interested ,are you worried .stop fixating on the AFL.

Here's a hint stupid..

This is the FIGHT CLUB....you argue for your sport & put the other side down..
You don't like that ..piss off & play pretend soldier.
But it hurts you fumblers when the unfairness of your comp is raised.


& there is only ONE team in the 8 because THE HILLS HAVE EYES was injured.
The AFL did everything they could to get the Gazzas in the 8 & they were on track,until Daddy needed bail.


Now this

I seem to remember the Storm got gifted many senior players when they came into the comp and have since been found guilty of cheating - The Swans however have played by the rules - me thinks the ONLY brainwashed people here are you and RD at least KE will give AFL a go - you however are way too narrow minded to even consider such a thing

You have NFI about RL .
The Storm were not GIFTED anything..
There were plenty of senior players looking for a club after the SL war compromise.
4 teams were cut ,so there were plenty of players to choose from.


& The Swans play by the legalised cheating rules of AFL house that ensure their success.
They get EXTRA$$$$$ that other don't.
& in whatever fucked up world you live in you think that's fair.

It is grossly unfair,in fact straight out cheating ,& you know it ,but wont admit it.

At least the NRL is a fair comp..
Oh & im narrow minded because I don't like a sport that is rigged,
That rewards mediocrity.
That does not penalise fumbling butter fingered uncos.
That openly lies about how many play the game .
That spruik their racism & anti gay stance yet do nothing about the problems in the game.
That have deals with the VIc police to keep things hush hush & protect the BRAND IMAGE.

Sorry that's not me ,I will follow a sport that for all its problems is fair.

The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance

NlolRL wrote:

The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance

Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.

TBF, I do remember my poor eels having a great run in 1989 before Sterlo had to retire, I think we managed to win around 10 games in the following 6 years

fark, if it wasn't sport related, I think i'm cursed or the mob I follow are.

The Raiders had a similar bit of luck when leading the comp and putting 70 past my mob, Ricky Stuart got injured at the end and the raiders went from minor premiers to nothing all because 1 player got injured. I'm not saying either of these 2 teams were shit without their main player, but it doesn't help if you don't have a half decent backup.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance

Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.

Salary cap is only one factor. Funny how you ignore the other

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance

Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.

Salary cap is only one factor. Funny how you ignore the other

the salary cap is the only factor you deluded fuckwit
oh & the draft too I spose

& the VFL manipulates both to the advantage of a few >
:_<> :_<> :_<>
what a compromised pile of puke it is

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance

Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.

Salary cap is only one factor. Funny how you ignore the other

the salary cap is the only factor you deluded fuckwit
oh & the draft too I spose

& the VFL manipulates both to the advantage of a few >
:_<> :_<> :_<>
what a compromised pile of puke it is

No it's not, not even close

sydneyfc wrote:

ive seen teams in all sports crumble when their key player runs into a bad run of form or gets injured. thats why they build those teams around those players...because thats what their talent suggests

perfect thread to deflect the attention away from the bulldogs game which only drew 9k at anz while the rugby union sold out the sfs though...but i dont miss much!!!!!!!

Hey bud, no deflection here. If you think that is worthy of a topic through it up. I would suggest you going totally of topic is a bigger deflection. But in response, I hope the union does sell out. I like union as a sport and follow the waratahs.