you'd better stop dave, other wise this might happen againRaiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.AFLcrap1 wrote::**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****NlolRL wrote:Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.AFLcrap1 wrote:maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.
Moron
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.
That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.
So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.![]()
![]()
>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
jesus
its a disease with this lot
they are beyond any rational thought ...... they stand there like indoctrinated cult followers repeating the mantra
its not cheating ommmmmmm
its not cheating oommmmmmm
its to level the playing field ommmmmmmm
its to level the playing field oommmmmmmmmm
have another sip of the cool aide fuckwit![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs season
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been liked: 7 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 7542
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
- Team: Melbourne Demons
- Location:
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been liked: 136 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
More like what freely available information are you avoiding? :_<>Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:Suck it up chump, despite your misgivings about th AFL competition, it's mnay many times bigger than the NRLRaiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.AFLcrap1 wrote::**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****NlolRL wrote:Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.AFLcrap1 wrote:maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.
Moron
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.
That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.
So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.![]()
![]()
>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
jesus
its a disease with this lot
they are beyond any rational thought ...... they stand there like indoctrinated cult followers repeating the mantra
its not cheating ommmmmmm
its not cheating oommmmmmm
its to level the playing field ommmmmmmm
its to level the playing field oommmmmmmmmm
have another sip of the cool aide fuckwit![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Want a tissue?![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
what page is that crap on the official VFL bible you brain washed fucktard ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ommmmmmmmmmm
ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
hmmmmmm
this cool aide tastes funny>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
2 minutes on the Internet is all that's required to see the AFL have a substantial advantage in crowds, revenue, memberships, national footprint, participation numbers, etc etc. about the only the the NRL win at is despicable acts :_<>
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
Why are you so fixated what and how the AFL manage their comp?????? I thought your interest is RL - if the AFL and it's clubs have an issue then so be it - how that effects you I don't know - looking at the AFL ladder there is only 1 team from the Northern states in there if there was so much AFL manipulation wouldn't they all be there - I seem to remember the Storm got gifted many senior players when they came into the comp and have since been found guilty of cheating - The Swans however have played by the rules - me thinks the ONLY brainwashed people here are you and RD at least KE will give AFL a go - you however are way too narrow minded to even consider such a thing!!!AFLcrap1 wrote:NlolRL wrote:It doesn't matter what the AFL or anyone else wanted. You can't pack a club full of kids and expect them to be a finals contender before theyve matured. The loss of senior players makes a massive difference to on field leadership. They'll dominate for years, but not until they're ready.AFLcrap1 wrote::**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****NlolRL wrote:Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.AFLcrap1 wrote:maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.
Moron
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.
That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.
So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.
Of course it's not a coincidence that expansion clubs get an advantage. The "go home" factor has drawn many a player back to their home state to be with their friends and family. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh jesus do you really believe that.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Tell me stupid.
How long is the Swans considered an EXPANSION team?.
You tards are so brainwashed its hysterical.
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
-
- Coach
- Posts: 18893
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
- Team: The Scottish Puffins
- Location:
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been liked: 75 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
So much derp in One small post.Swans4ever wrote:Why are you so fixated what and how the AFL manage their comp?????? I thought your interest is RL - if the AFL and it's clubs have an issue then so be it - how that effects you I don't know - looking at the AFL ladder there is only 1 team from the Northern states in there if there was so much AFL manipulation wouldn't they all be there - I seem to remember the Storm got gifted many senior players when they came into the comp and have since been found guilty of cheating - The Swans however have played by the rules - me thinks the ONLY brainwashed people here are you and RD at least KE will give AFL a go - you however are way too narrow minded to even consider such a thing!!!AFLcrap1 wrote:NlolRL wrote:It doesn't matter what the AFL or anyone else wanted. You can't pack a club full of kids and expect them to be a finals contender before theyve matured. The loss of senior players makes a massive difference to on field leadership. They'll dominate for years, but not until they're ready.AFLcrap1 wrote::**** :**** :**** :**** :**** :****NlolRL wrote:Yeah good one, tanking after being in contention for the finals.AFLcrap1 wrote:maybe they started "TANKING" .
Its a fumbleball tradition.
Moron
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Maybe I was wrong.
Is this team One of the "Special needs" Clubs?.
That is a club that AFL house will move Heaven & Earth to make sure is successful.
One of the chosen few that benefit from EXTRA everything ,
Funny how its non heartland clubs that get the "Legalised Cheating" benefits from AFL house,& all to the detriment of long established heartland clubs.
So maybe they didn't tank.....I suppose you don't have to when you are already getting the Extras that most other clubs don't get.
What a fair & equitable comp you follow.
Of course it's not a coincidence that expansion clubs get an advantage. The "go home" factor has drawn many a player back to their home state to be with their friends and family. It's not cheating to help expansion teams keep players, it's levelling the playing field.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh jesus do you really believe that.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Tell me stupid.
How long is the Swans considered an EXPANSION team?.
You tards are so brainwashed its hysterical.








Any time Derpball is shown up as the manipulated compromised comp it is ,all we get is the standard deflection..
Why are you so interested ,are you worried .stop fixating on the AFL.
Here's a hint stupid..
This is the FIGHT CLUB....you argue for your sport & put the other side down..
You don't like that ..piss off & play pretend soldier.
But it hurts you fumblers when the unfairness of your comp is raised.
& there is only ONE team in the 8 because THE HILLS HAVE EYES was injured.
The AFL did everything they could to get the Gazzas in the 8 & they were on track,until Daddy needed bail.
Now this








I seem to remember the Storm got gifted many senior players when they came into the comp and have since been found guilty of cheating - The Swans however have played by the rules - me thinks the ONLY brainwashed people here are you and RD at least KE will give AFL a go - you however are way too narrow minded to even consider such a thing
You have NFI about RL .
The Storm were not GIFTED anything..
There were plenty of senior players looking for a club after the SL war compromise.
4 teams were cut ,so there were plenty of players to choose from.





& The Swans play by the legalised cheating rules of AFL house that ensure their success.
They get EXTRA$$$$$ that other don't.
& in whatever fucked up world you live in you think that's fair.
It is grossly unfair,in fact straight out cheating ,& you know it ,but wont admit it.
At least the NRL is a fair comp..
Oh & im narrow minded because I don't like a sport that is rigged,
That rewards mediocrity.
That does not penalise fumbling butter fingered uncos.
That openly lies about how many play the game .
That spruik their racism & anti gay stance yet do nothing about the problems in the game.
That have deals with the VIc police to keep things hush hush & protect the BRAND IMAGE.
Sorry that's not me ,I will follow a sport that for all its problems is fair.





TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


-
- Coach
- Posts: 7542
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
- Team: Melbourne Demons
- Location:
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been liked: 136 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance
-
- Coach
- Posts: 18893
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
- Team: The Scottish Puffins
- Location:
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been liked: 75 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.NlolRL wrote:The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance







TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
TBF, I do remember my poor eels having a great run in 1989 before Sterlo had to retire, I think we managed to win around 10 games in the following 6 years
fark, if it wasn't sport related, I think i'm cursed or the mob I follow are.
The Raiders had a similar bit of luck when leading the comp and putting 70 past my mob, Ricky Stuart got injured at the end and the raiders went from minor premiers to nothing all because 1 player got injured. I'm not saying either of these 2 teams were shit without their main player, but it doesn't help if you don't have a half decent backup.



fark, if it wasn't sport related, I think i'm cursed or the mob I follow are.
The Raiders had a similar bit of luck when leading the comp and putting 70 past my mob, Ricky Stuart got injured at the end and the raiders went from minor premiers to nothing all because 1 player got injured. I'm not saying either of these 2 teams were shit without their main player, but it doesn't help if you don't have a half decent backup.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 7542
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
- Team: Melbourne Demons
- Location:
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been liked: 136 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
Salary cap is only one factor. Funny how you ignore the otherAFLcrap1 wrote:Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.NlolRL wrote:The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
NlolRL wrote:Salary cap is only one factor. Funny how you ignore the otherAFLcrap1 wrote:Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.NlolRL wrote:The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the salary cap is the only factor you deluded fuckwit
oh & the draft too I spose
& the VFL manipulates both to the advantage of a few








what a compromised pile of puke it is









RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 7542
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
- Team: Melbourne Demons
- Location:
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been liked: 136 times
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
No it's not, not even closeRaiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:Salary cap is only one factor. Funny how you ignore the otherAFLcrap1 wrote:Were they on the same salary cap as every other team?.NlolRL wrote:The storm werent gifted anything, other than one of the largest football department budgets in the land despite few if any fans, members or crowds, and making a loss year after year. This no doubt assisted their decade of dominance
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the salary cap is the only factor you deluded fuckwit
oh & the draft too I spose
& the VFL manipulates both to the advantage of a few>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
what a compromised pile of puke it is![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- Captain
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:09 pm
- Team:
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the AFL comp that bad, does 1 injury end a clubs seas
Hey bud, no deflection here. If you think that is worthy of a topic through it up. I would suggest you going totally of topic is a bigger deflection. But in response, I hope the union does sell out. I like union as a sport and follow the waratahs.sydneyfc wrote:ive seen teams in all sports crumble when their key player runs into a bad run of form or gets injured. thats why they build those teams around those players...because thats what their talent suggests
perfect thread to deflect the attention away from the bulldogs game which only drew 9k at anz while the rugby union sold out the sfs though...but i dont miss much!!!!!!!
NRLCrap1 » Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:28 am
NRLCrap1 says: Crowds don't mean squat,
NRLCrap1 says: Crowds don't mean squat,
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 8 guests