Page 3 of 6

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 10:10 am
by Cracker
Spambots are limited to website providers, so what I will do if I should become moderator (if I have access to certain information that is) is check NRLCrap1's provider. It won't guarantee it of course, because I do not believe he is behaving like a bot.

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 10:20 am
by 214Four
do you keep your election promises?? have you budgeted for it?

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 10:43 am
by Cracker
I do keep my election promises. My budgeting is in order. Thank you for asking me the difficult questions.

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 11:41 am
by AFLcrap1
Cracker wrote:
I do keep my election promises. My budgeting is in order. Thank you for asking me the difficult questions.
Did you get hit in the head a lot when you were a kid.?
Fall off your bike a lot(No Helmut obviously)?

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 1:42 pm
by NRLCrap1
Of course I'm not a spambot! Here's the definition of a spambot;

"A spambot is an automated computer program designed to assist in the sending of spam."

Now someone tell me about spam and how what I type is spam? What am I advertising or promoting for payment?

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 5:04 pm
by Cracker
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Cracker wrote:
I do keep my election promises. My budgeting is in order. Thank you for asking me the difficult questions.
Did you get hit in the head a lot when you were a kid.?
Fall off your bike a lot(No Helmut obviously)?
No. I said difficult questions and that was easy.

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:14 pm
by King-Eliagh
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Of course I'm not a spambot! Here's the definition of a spambot;

"A spambot is an automated computer program designed to assist in the sending of spam."

Now someone tell me about spam and how what I type is spam? What am I advertising or promoting for payment?
Can someone deactivate this annoying spambot? Beaussie?

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:19 pm
by Cracker
Please prove that he is a spambot.

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:22 pm
by King-Eliagh
It's obvious. If it's not then I think it should have to prove it's not.

Hey spambot? Tell us the meaning of love and what love means to you?

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:25 pm
by Cracker
It's not obvious. Please explain your reasoning.

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:29 pm
by King-Eliagh
Comon spambot, answer the questions if ur not a spambot!

:lol:

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:37 am
by NRLCrap1
Asking Eliagh to explain his reasoning is like asking Gillard to explain the fricking Carbon Tax!!

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:33 am
by King-Eliagh
It's obvious as all fukk cwacker. We all know it but ok, just for the dummies I'll explain. I refer to spambots post above and failure to reply to my questions about love.

You see cwacker, spambots don't feel human emotions such as love, hence our spambots inability to express what love means to it or even answer my question. Additionally spambots are often developed to recognise a set of words and then phrase together a fairly benign sentence, or even two sentences if the programmer has decided so. Example provided below.
cwacker wrote:
please explain your reasoning
nrl spambot wrote:
asking Eliagh to 'explain his reasoning is like' ... ...
And it's like this every time with spambot. Hence his new name ;)

So spambot, define love and tell us what it feels like.

:lol:

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:15 pm
by Cracker
The definition you have given is not a spambot, King Eliagh. You have failed to provide a valid explanation as invited. A true spambot is not able to feel any emotion at all, let alone "love". It can not hate and it certainly can not abuse or mock. NRLCrap1 has shown hate and mocked, and occasionally abused also.

Re: Who should go and who should stay

Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:23 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Of course I'm not a spambot! Here's the definition of a spambot;

"A spambot is an automated computer program designed to assist in the sending of spam."

Now someone tell me about spam and how what I type is spam? What am I advertising or promoting for payment?
Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AFLcrap1, Bing [Bot], pussycat , Spambot[NRLCrap1] and 0 guests

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>