Talking Footy

Cracker wrote:

It would appear that AFLcrap1 has sporadic issues with comprehension. And responsibility for what he says, and in the future this will be of interest.

So "In Effect,in my opinion ,you are saying you like to do strange things with dead animals.

See my sparodic issue with comprehension ,is the same as yours..

In my opinion
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Whaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaa - you whine more than anyone I have ever known - I found the insinuation as well LOUD and clear - again you like to have these meanings in your posts and then run away when you get pulled up about it - just for once admit your wrong and move on!

Bullshit.
If I was saying something about the AFL ..I would say it.
If I think someone is lying..i will post what I think is proof it is a lie..

& of course you would see an insinuation..you are a strange one...

There is no insinuation..
It was a simple explanation of why a player would have another job..
No comparison at all to any other sport.

My guess is the AFL would have something very similar in place for young fringe players.

So put your paranoia on hold.

I have no problems calling AFL racist/homophobic/liars etc,
so tell me WHY the fuck do I need to make insinuations.

Paranoid central here with you fumblers.

God your a parrot - you have heard Adam and myself repeatedly call you paranoid and now it's your new expression - how pathetic are you??? Here's a thought look up some past posts of RD and KE so you can copy their expressions as well - oh well they say imitation is the highest form of flattery so I guess I should take it as a compliment!!!! How unoriginal and without independent thought! Now admit the insinuation was wrong stop sooking and we can all move on!!

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Whaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaa - you whine more than anyone I have ever known - I found the insinuation as well LOUD and clear - again you like to have these meanings in your posts and then run away when you get pulled up about it - just for once admit your wrong and move on!

Bullshit.
If I was saying something about the AFL ..I would say it.
If I think someone is lying..i will post what I think is proof it is a lie..

& of course you would see an insinuation..you are a strange one...

There is no insinuation..
It was a simple explanation of why a player would have another job..
No comparison at all to any other sport.

My guess is the AFL would have something very similar in place for young fringe players.

So put your paranoia on hold.

I have no problems calling AFL racist/homophobic/liars etc,
so tell me WHY the fuck do I need to make insinuations.

Paranoid central here with you fumblers.

God your a parrot - you have heard Adam and myself repeatedly call you paranoid and now it's your new expression - how pathetic are you??? Here's a thought look up some past posts of RD and KE so you can copy their expressions as well - oh well they say imitation is the highest form of flattery so I guess I should take it as a compliment!!!! How unoriginal and without independent thought! Now admit the insinuation was wrong stop sooking and we can all move on!!

Never made any insinuation..
Show me where. I WILL WAIT... :_<> :_<>
All I did was explain why a player was working..
No comparison,no mention of AFL.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Whaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaa - you whine more than anyone I have ever known - I found the insinuation as well LOUD and clear - again you like to have these meanings in your posts and then run away when you get pulled up about it - just for once admit your wrong and move on!

Bullshit.
If I was saying something about the AFL ..I would say it.
If I think someone is lying..i will post what I think is proof it is a lie..

& of course you would see an insinuation..you are a strange one...

There is no insinuation..
It was a simple explanation of why a player would have another job..
No comparison at all to any other sport.

My guess is the AFL would have something very similar in place for young fringe players.

So put your paranoia on hold.

I have no problems calling AFL racist/homophobic/liars etc,
so tell me WHY the fuck do I need to make insinuations.

Paranoid central here with you fumblers.

God your a parrot - you have heard Adam and myself repeatedly call you paranoid and now it's your new expression - how pathetic are you??? Here's a thought look up some past posts of RD and KE so you can copy their expressions as well - oh well they say imitation is the highest form of flattery so I guess I should take it as a compliment!!!! How unoriginal and without independent thought! Now admit the insinuation was wrong stop sooking and we can all move on!!

Never made any insinuation..
Show me where. I WILL WAIT... :_<> :_<>
All I did was explain why a player was working..
No comparison,no mention of AFL.

NUPHY!

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Whaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaa - you whine more than anyone I have ever known - I found the insinuation as well LOUD and clear - again you like to have these meanings in your posts and then run away when you get pulled up about it - just for once admit your wrong and move on!

Bullshit.
If I was saying something about the AFL ..I would say it.
If I think someone is lying..i will post what I think is proof it is a lie..

& of course you would see an insinuation..you are a strange one...

There is no insinuation..
It was a simple explanation of why a player would have another job..
No comparison at all to any other sport.

My guess is the AFL would have something very similar in place for young fringe players.

So put your paranoia on hold.

I have no problems calling AFL racist/homophobic/liars etc,
so tell me WHY the fuck do I need to make insinuations.

Paranoid central here with you fumblers.

God your a parrot - you have heard Adam and myself repeatedly call you paranoid and now it's your new expression - how pathetic are you??? Here's a thought look up some past posts of RD and KE so you can copy their expressions as well - oh well they say imitation is the highest form of flattery so I guess I should take it as a compliment!!!! How unoriginal and without independent thought! Now admit the insinuation was wrong stop sooking and we can all move on!!

Never made any insinuation..
Show me where. I WILL WAIT... :_<> :_<>
All I did was explain why a player was working..
No comparison,no mention of AFL.

NUPHY!

Your standard answer when you cant show what you claim.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

It would appear that AFLcrap1 has sporadic issues with comprehension. And responsibility for what he says, and in the future this will be of interest.

So "In Effect,in my opinion ,you are saying you like to do strange things with dead animals.

See my sparodic issue with comprehension ,is the same as yours..

In my opinion
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

This is further proof of your poor comprehension, and also demonstrates a severe issue with responsibility for what you say.

I read the dribble in the first post the other night and just shook my head, didn't bother with the thread until now.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa.

A high school kid still doing his exams could get a call up to first grade (it has happened before with 16-17 year olds getting a crack) and you fumbleidiots (I like that one cause it's true) seem to think this kid just starting out who very well could play only one game in his career should be on stupid money straight away.


Bahahahahahaha hahahaha hahahahaha.

If that's how fumbleball does it in your code, you can keep it.

Funny, on the footy show the other night Brett Finch was talking with the other panelists and joking around, when they asked Billy Slater and some others what their first job was (remember BF is older) they all gave their answer. When they asked Brett Finch, he laughed and said, I have never ever had a job, I got picked while at school and went straight into first grade and never had to get a job.

These days, every player coming up from younger age groups all need to either have a job or be studying so they can get a job. That's the rules these days, years ago some as above never needed a job at all, these days you are required to have something to fall back on in case it doesn't work out in the NRL.

Not many people actually make it past 15 NRL games in their career.

Cracker wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

It would appear that AFLcrap1 has sporadic issues with comprehension. And responsibility for what he says, and in the future this will be of interest.

So "In Effect,in my opinion ,you are saying you like to do strange things with dead animals.

See my sparodic issue with comprehension ,is the same as yours..

In my opinion
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

This is further proof of your poor comprehension, and also demonstrates a severe issue with responsibility for what you say.

Doesn't alter the fact you lied.

I didn't lie. You won't take responsibility for what you say.

Cracker wrote:

I didn't lie. You won't take responsibility for what you say.

I do you fucking FLIP Anyone can read what i posted & there is NOTHING at all like what you claimed..

.If I got something to say about Derpball ,I will say it ..
I don't need to insinuate anything..

And yet you did. Take responsibility for it.

Cracker wrote:

And yet you did. Take responsibility for it.

So in Effect ,You like to do What with Dead animals ??

Stop avoiding the reality of the situation, AFLcrap1.

Cracker wrote:

Stop avoiding the reality of the situation, AFLcrap1.

You & reality are worlds apart.


Exhibit # 1..A post that talks about why RL players have a 2nd job & does not mention or compare it to any other sport ,is read by you as saying ..AFL players will have nothing when they finish their career..
:_<> :_<> .

Exhibit #2..Away crowds are a sign of a clubs popularity in their home town/region..




Now back to my question.
Did you get hit in the head a lot when you were young?.

& Cwackhead ..Xman has backed me up on this ..

so be a good widdle boy & apologize.

Postby Xman » Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:54 am




AFLcrap1 wrote:



Cracker wrote:
In order to be competitive, the NRL must follow the AFL's lead, AFLcrap1. It's all very well to state in effect that AFL players will have nothing when their career is over. They will have a healthy bank account that will allow them to start their own business. Some go into the media. The NRL should be allowing it's salary cap to rise so players can be encouraged to play the game full time and make money out of it. Having a second job can actually be a negative in terms of the time required in both areas. This is a distinct problem at the local level in Aussie Rules. I've seen it in Albury and I still see it where I live now.
What fucking planet are you on.
I am serious.

Where did I say the highlighted bit above.
Fuck off until you can talk about what I posted ,not what the voices in your head tell you.

The rest of that pile of crap is just as stupid as the bit I responded to..
You pretend to know about RL but don't have a clue.
Gotta say I agree with AFLc. He never made a single reference to AFL players in his comment, yet cracker incorrectly assumed he did.

I think an apology is in order