Talking Footy

I have already answered this and you are ignoring that answer. You are being completely irresponsible.

This ? What's this ?

Cracker wrote:

Then show me how Buddy Franklin can play for anyone other than Sydney while under contract.

This time answer the question.

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade.
Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Apparantly you are not.

I cannot help the logically impaired. Sorry.

I see. You believe that Buddy Franklin can go back to Hawthorn or play for any other club whenever he wants whilst he is under contract with Sydney.

Congratulations.

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade.
Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Apparantly you are not.

I cannot help the logically impaired. Sorry.

Sorry crackpot but if you cannot understand basic logic stop going around in circles.

You're running away from the subject now. I blew your argument apart and you are unable to cope with that fact.

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade.
Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Apparantly you are not.

I cannot help the logically impaired. Sorry.

Sorry crackpot but if you cannot understand basic logic stop going around in circles.

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Keep running, Cos789.

I'm sorry you have no basic logic skills. I'd love a proper debate.
But you don't seem to be able to comprehend the most basic of logic.

I comprehend fine. You refuse to answer the question. Last chance.

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade.
Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Apparantly you are not.

I cannot help the logically impaired. Sorry.

Sorry but if you cannot comprehend the simple logic behind my answer then you shouldn't be here.
I cannot make it any simpler for you. Sorry.

You don't understand the issue here either. I'm done on this thread. You are not capable of holding a debate.

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade.
Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Apparantly you are not.

I cannot help the logically impaired. Sorry.

Sorry but if you cannot comprehend the simple logic behind my answer then you shouldn't be here.
I cannot make it any simpler for you. Sorry.

Come back when you understand that a contract in itself is a restraint of trade.

.

cos789 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Players are NOT free to play in leagues outside the AFL. I don't know where you got that idea from, Cos789. Second string teams in the VFL do not count incidentally because they are still playing in effect for their AFL club. No listed AFL player can play in Albury for example at a whim.

Players play for leagues outside of the the AFL ALL THE TIME. All the time.

The fact you can only play in one league at a time only re-inforces my point.

Cos, that didn't help because you left yourself wide open for attack. Crack-it-up killed you on semantics.

What you should have done was shown him the games Jason Akermanis has played since finishing his AFL career, as well as other examples of AFL players doing the same thing. That would have shut him up better.