Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Just replying to your
. NRL fans are more interested in sitting at home..
I showed that on the GC they are still above the Suns.

In a supposed heartland state, and with a 4 years head start, they should have the support of a far greater proportion of the local sports fans. Therefore it's pretty clear, like the rest of the RL community, they prefer to stay at home.

Not as much as the Fumblefans do .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Just replying to your
. NRL fans are more interested in sitting at home..
I showed that on the GC they are still above the Suns.

In a supposed heartland state, and with a 4 years head start, they should have the support of a far greater proportion of the local sports fans. Therefore it's pretty clear, like the rest of the RL community, they prefer to stay at home.

Not as much as the Fumblefans do .

Wt? >

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Just replying to your
. NRL fans are more interested in sitting at home..
I showed that on the GC they are still above the Suns.

In a supposed heartland state, and with a 4 years head start, they should have the support of a far greater proportion of the local sports fans. Therefore it's pretty clear, like the rest of the RL community, they prefer to stay at home.

Not as much as the Fumblefans do .

Wt? >

On the GC ..Fumblefans stay home more than RL fan do.
That fucks your argument up.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Just replying to your
. NRL fans are more interested in sitting at home..
I showed that on the GC they are still above the Suns.

In a supposed heartland state, and with a 4 years head start, they should have the support of a far greater proportion of the local sports fans. Therefore it's pretty clear, like the rest of the RL community, they prefer to stay at home.

Not as much as the Fumblefans do .

Wt? >

On the GC ..Fumblefans stay home more than RL fan do.
That fucks your argument up.

Except its rubbish nor makes sense

You really expect the meat puppet to make sense, Xman??

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Just replying to your
. NRL fans are more interested in sitting at home..
I showed that on the GC they are still above the Suns.

In a supposed heartland state, and with a 4 years head start, they should have the support of a far greater proportion of the local sports fans. Therefore it's pretty clear, like the rest of the RL community, they prefer to stay at home.

Not as much as the Fumblefans do .

Wt? >

On the GC ..Fumblefans stay home more than RL fan do.
That fucks your argument up.

Except its rubbish nor makes sense

I will explain it Read S...l...o...w...l...y
You are claiming some victory because Suns have more memebers.

I said ,no..Memebership is an AFL culture thing....Relatively new to RL.
You make claim that is an excuse.
I said real indicators are Crowds & tv ratings..On the GC.

You said it shows RL fans prefer to sit at home .
I replied with
On the GC ..Fumblefans stay home more than RL fan do..
Which is proven by HIGHER TITANS crowds.
So you are wrong in claiming that .


& you failed to see where your argument is fucked up..& then the little yipper lap dog pokes his head in to back you up ....You know you're fucked when he shows up.

Who's getting more revenue, meat puppet?

The Suns.

Back to Baillie Henderson with you!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Who's getting more revenue, meat puppet?

The Suns.

Back to Baillie Henderson with you!

Proof .

Titans and suns crowds are prettu close ... And this is,traditional rl heartland. so you have more people brought up on anf,fillowingr rl...although that gap is closing. I woukd,argue then that a,higher prrcentage og suns,fans go to the,game

Phelpsy wrote:

Titans and suns crowds are prettu close ... And this is,traditional rl heartland. so you have more people brought up on anf,fillowingr rl...although that gap is closing. I woukd,argue then that a,higher prrcentage og suns,fans go to the,game

Bingo

I would argue that a large part of the crowd are opposition fans who make a weekend of it at the GC.
I don't think they are Suns fans

There is some truth to that particukatly the bigger crowds of,Collingwood and,Carlton, but there are,a lot of suns,fans and you see this when you go to a game. They certainly buy the merchandise. There is plenty of suns followers on the coast. You do get a,lit of crows fans though when they play. Titans get this,too with a Sydney club where it is tradition the supporters fly up for it. There was a campaign last year to get more locals to the game

AFLcrap1 wrote:

I would argue that a large part of the crowd are opposition fans who make a weekend of it at the GC.
I don't think they are Suns fans

A large part of crowds above the Sun's membership level could be opposition fans.
The Qld government actually acknowledges the benfit to the economy of this football tourism
but it's not a large number in comparison to membership numbers.

Phelpsy wrote:

... And this is,traditional rl heartland.

yes it is
see below

numbers of GC peepers watching the Titans

14K at the game
60K on FTA ( a 3rd of the average Brisbane/GC audience for a titans game on FTA)
74K on average a game total .....

for the Thuns
13K at the game
10K on FTA & 3K on pay ( a 3rd of the average Brisbane/GC audience for a thuns game on FTA)
26K on average a game total

& the lesson endith ............................................... here !!

AFLcrap1 wrote:

I would argue that a large part of the crowd are opposition fans who make a weekend of it at the GC.
I don't think they are Suns fans

So the Sun's opposition fans are more passionate than the Titan's opposition fans, who stay at home and watch TV? :_<>

Either way you slice it, GC is supposed to be RL heartland. Why the hell are the lowly Suns even challenging them crowd wise, let alone pretty much level pegging