Swans4ever wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Swans4ever wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:You Don't like being shown up as gutless ,as well as stupid & a liar.
Bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Simple ..don't post lies..
So when are you going to demand the same from RD? You again have shown yourself to be a hypocritical flog - what an obnoxious turd - no wonder you live in QLD wouldn't last 5 mins in Melb!
I will spell it out for the terminally stupid.
I am arguing against you backward hicks ,not against RL fans.
If you mob lie I will laugh & call you out on it.
& I have shown nearly all the posters on here lie ,quite a bit.(Phelpsy seems to be able to be a derpball fan without lying).
If you have a problem with RD ..deal with it..Its not my problem...Its your problem.
I have my hands full showing you lying flogs up as compulsive liars.
Alright - thats your opinion for someone who has repeatedly said there is little interest in AFL nth of the Murray it's a bit rich calling others liars! You keep relying on the Lawson report which ONLY refers to Auskick yet you have continued to use this as a basis for saying AF people are liars - you are the biggest hypocrite on this site - you continually only rely on one figure (TV ratings) to prove your point - when others factors are presented to you, you ignore it! What a flog!
You are simply a liar.
Show me where I have repeatedly said
"thats your opinion for someone who has repeatedly said there is little interest in AFL nth of the Murray",
.
I stated that North of the Murray few care about Vlad trying to keep AFL in the news as the RLWC & A league were on.
But carry on its good for a giggle.
You ********* are a laugh a minute.
AS for the 2nd part of your rant..
Jesus do you have a clue about anything.
The Lawson report was NOT ONLY about Ausfumble..
You lied again..You need help.
AUsfumble got a big mention because.
Introducing primary aged school children to sample Australian football in metropolitan Sydney via school, Auskick or promotional programs appears to be a strength.
Converting young Australian football „samplers‟ into regular club participants with the subsequent engagement of parents, friends and colleagues has not yet been as successful.
In the chase for participant numbers in NSW and ACT, a shortened and often subsidised version of Auskick has been aggressively rolled out in primary schools (In-School Auskick) and after-school centres (Community Auskick). The In-School participants have rarely elected to join an Auskick program. Their school has chosen to include an Auskick program.
1. Western Sydney – The Reality versus Perception Gap
The reality is that junior club maturity and participation numbers appear to have stalled.
There are 6% less junior/youth players in 2012 than in 2009. The perception, however, is that the game is growing well.
This perception is supported by masking low junior club numbers with Auskick numbers (Club, School and Community Auskick) and school program numbers. This optimistic, bullish perception is needed to market the game, however this perception urgently needs to be underpinned by committed junior club participants.
& you don't see a problem with that?.
You obviously didn't read the report,& if you did you would see what he is saying..
Like below...which is not Ausfumble..
The greatest „retention cliff‟ in GSJ football occurs from U14 to U15 age groups (-27%; 706 to 515 players in Greater Sydney). Across the five regions and their clubs many solutions are being trialled or were suggested to improve retention at this, and all other points of significant player loss.
The second biggest „retention cliff‟ is when U16 junior footballers fail to join the senior ranks. 86% of Junior Club Presidents predicted that more than half their U16 footballers will be lost from Australian Football within two years.
So your lie about the report ONLY being about Auskick is laughable.
Just like most of your posts..
.
> 
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
