international representation in ****** league terms, is an Australian side playing against a side full of B grade Australian NRL players picked to play for another country, because they once holidayed thereRaiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:No national representation, Dave??????
What do you call domination of four states and two territories and a substantive presence in the other two states??
I call that "national representation"!!!
Of course it won't change!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't care what a deluded twat calls it
that's
domestic .. club representation........ you blithering cockhead![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
national is representing a nation in the international arena![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
your sport does not do this
because its the worlds tiniest sport
& you are right
that won't change![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
OMG
owned
your picture appears in the dictionary under this word![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()

RL is far from being international, its nothing more than a chest beating exercise, like they attempt to claim in being the most popular sport in Australia but are about to be over taken buy the A league as number 2

the Game was built up buy Paker & murdoch's (news Ltd), in the 80s & 90s. now that news ltd, finally worked out it was a dud investment, the NRL numbers continue to fall, crowds, TV ratings
