Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

When does the AFL world cup start? I'm baring up just thinking about it :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Get on the Scottish Puffins(yes that is their name).
Will be big odds ,but I think the huge crowd of 63 behind them they will get home,Over a very tenacious Australian side..
Oh sorry My mistake .The only place on Earth with a pro or semi pro comp isn't allowed to play..

GO PUFFINS

63

that'd require 60 to walk in by mistake ... or be kidnapped by the VFL :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

VFL
tiniest sport on the planet :_<> :_<>

Hehe, only 2 and a half months and it all starts again at the SFS and Wellington, yeehaa :D

Need a break, been a looooong year watching the footy from all over the joint, need a rest and what better timing?

It's summer, the beer is cold and the chicks are hot and uncovered. Love living near the ocean.

Yes indeed

Certainly the female office workers wear a lot more attractive clothing with the hot weather we have had in Melb - very nice.

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

it still beats the NRL in every department
$1.253 billion AFL
$1.025 billion NRL

ahhhhh
for the fuckstick again

VFL 1.253 Billion for 5 years & 3105 hours of telecast
NRL 1.3 Billion for 5 years & 2010 hours of telecast
now we know you are a dumb fuck
but pick up a calculator & work out who the broadcasters think is a more valuable product dickhead

theres a lad

$1.025 billion for the NRL, Dave! Stop including New Zealand because it doesn't count towards AUSTRALIAN broadcast rights!!

Doesn't that also include everything ?

Here's another point. Nine paid for the right to dictate to the NRL when the games are played. Seven did not.

So if Nine didn't get their way, watch the value of the NRL rights DROP!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Here's another point. Nine paid for the right to dictate to the NRL when the games are played. Seven did not.

So if Nine didn't get their way, watch the value of the NRL rights DROP!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

but but but

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

it still beats the NRL in every department
$1.253 billion AFL
$1.025 billion NRL

ahhhhh
for the fuckstick again

VFL 1.253 Billion for 5 years & 3105 hours of telecast
NRL 1.3 Billion for 5 years & 2010 hours of telecast
now we know you are a dumb fuck
but pick up a calculator & work out who the broadcasters think is a more valuable product dickhead

theres a lad

$1.025 billion for the NRL, Dave! Stop including New Zealand because it doesn't count towards AUSTRALIAN broadcast rights!!

happy for the vfl to include their os rights



:_<> :_<> :_<>

we got more money all up & it doesn't matter where we got it from f wit
its in the NRL's bank account
its theres

I mean
do you think we're not allowed to spend that Kiwi money in Australia or something

:_<> :_<> :_<>
what a tool

Dave, how does people being interested.in nz indicate the popularity of rl in. Australia! It doesn't "!

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, how does people being interested.in nz indicate the popularity of rl in. Australia! It doesn't "!

we don't need the kiwis dickhead :_<> :_<>
they just seal the NRLs owning of the vfl from a broadcasters point of view

take off their 100 million off our 1.3 billion deal
then calculate how many hours both comps air for the length of both comps deals to determine what each code earns for an hour of telecast


then



cry a lot

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I mean

this was one of the .. expert .... reasons as to why we couldn't get anywhere near the VFL's deal
we are on air for a lot longer that's why we get more .. said the fumblers

>
what happened fumblers
what the fuck

happened :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, how does people being interested.in nz indicate the popularity of rl in. Australia! It doesn't "!

we don't need the kiwis dickhead :_<> :_<>
they just seal the NRLs owning of the vfl from a broadcasters point of view

take off their 100 million off our 1.3 billion deal
then calculate how many hours both comps air for the length of both comps deals to determine what each code earns for an hour of telecast


then



cry a lot

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I mean

this was one of the .. expert .... reasons as to why we couldn't get anywhere near the VFL's deal
we are on air for a lot longer that's why we get more .. said the fumblers

>
what happened fumblers
what the fuck

happened :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So winners are determined by dollars per hour now, not total?

Hmm, the NRL have 8 games a round, with only two shown concurrently, therefore a total of around 14 hours per weekend.

The AFL have 9 games per week, but all but one a game are shown concurrently, so about 15 hours per weekend.

Then the NRL have a few more rounds over the season.

So even on this ridiculous comparison you still lose

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, how does people being interested.in nz indicate the popularity of rl in. Australia! It doesn't "!

we don't need the kiwis dickhead :_<> :_<>
they just seal the NRLs owning of the vfl from a broadcasters point of view

take off their 100 million off our 1.3 billion deal
then calculate how many hours both comps air for the length of both comps deals to determine what each code earns for an hour of telecast


then



cry a lot

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I mean

this was one of the .. expert .... reasons as to why we couldn't get anywhere near the VFL's deal
we are on air for a lot longer that's why we get more .. said the fumblers

>
what happened fumblers
what the fuck

happened :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So winners are determined by dollars per hour now, not total?

Hmm, the NRL have 8 games a round, with only two shown concurrently, therefore a total of around 14 hours per weekend.

The AFL have 9 games per week, but all but one a game are shown concurrently, so about 15 hours per weekend.

Then the NRL have a few more rounds over the season.

So even on this ridiculous comparison you still lose

channel 9 run the NRL draw & choose to have the games run in prime time, to boost their ratings, in which the NRL still looses in

adamj1300 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, how does people being interested.in nz indicate the popularity of rl in. Australia! It doesn't "!

we don't need the kiwis dickhead :_<> :_<>
they just seal the NRLs owning of the vfl from a broadcasters point of view

take off their 100 million off our 1.3 billion deal
then calculate how many hours both comps air for the length of both comps deals to determine what each code earns for an hour of telecast


then



cry a lot

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I mean

this was one of the .. expert .... reasons as to why we couldn't get anywhere near the VFL's deal
we are on air for a lot longer that's why we get more .. said the fumblers

>
what happened fumblers
what the fuck

happened :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So winners are determined by dollars per hour now, not total?

Hmm, the NRL have 8 games a round, with only two shown concurrently, therefore a total of around 14 hours per weekend.

The AFL have 9 games per week, but all but one a game are shown concurrently, so about 15 hours per weekend.

Then the NRL have a few more rounds over the season.

So even on this ridiculous comparison you still lose

channel 9 run the NRL draw & choose to have the games run in prime time, to boost their ratings, in which the NRL still looses in

Exactly. Ch9 control the NRL schedule, play everything in prime time, and the AFL still get more.

Notice he doesn't talk about TOTAL revenue? Because the AFL had 425 mil to the NRL's 285 mil - thats because their well behind the eight ball!