Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

by somewhere do you mean 500 people crowds?

wanna know where RLWC was after 10 years? 1960 RLWC (6 years after inception) 33k final match. WHY CANT AFL DO THAT??? piece of shit sport with no international relevance. that's why.

and next week you'll be seeing some more records broken as Old Trafford sells out to 75k.

NRL started off in England to begin with & Union is popular in England, so if the Final doesn't sell out, it will only prove to be a bigger joke than what it already is.
so after 50 years of having a world cup, you have Australia, NZ & maybe England a distance, are the dominate sides & the rest are there to just make up the numbers, so for dumb fucks like you can go around trying to convince every one that there is a RLWC.

and talking about figures 170 odd of the players in the RLCW play in the NRL. >
if it was such a success the NRl community wouldn't need to go around trying to convince us otherwise!
its nothing but a gloried tournament for the Aussies playing NZ but needing to play a bunch of warm up games against minor countries

its a joke at best, you guys have the right to sue for false advertising, world cup,
it should be advertised as follows
AUS VS NZ, ,featuring a bunch of countries, that could muster up a few amateur's & several NRL players to play the might of AUS or NZ

:_<> :_<> :_<>

come see us when
an Australian side gets to play someone .... anyone ...in an international game of fumbles & bumbles
when... you can sellout a phone box over seas :_<> :_<>

& when your codes players can get paid to play somewhere .... anywhere ..... outside of this country

til then


we shit on your bumbling crap sport internationally

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

by somewhere do you mean 500 people crowds?

wanna know where RLWC was after 10 years? 1960 RLWC (6 years after inception) 33k final match. WHY CANT AFL DO THAT??? piece of shit sport with no international relevance. that's why.

and next week you'll be seeing some more records broken as Old Trafford sells out to 75k.

NRL started off in England to begin with & Union is popular in England, so if the Final doesn't sell out, it will only prove to be a bigger joke than what it already is.
so after 50 years of having a world cup, you have Australia, NZ & maybe England a distance, are the dominate sides & the rest are there to just make up the numbers, so for dumb fucks like you can go around trying to convince every one that there is a RLWC.

and talking about figures 170 odd of the players in the RLCW play in the NRL. >
if it was such a success the NRl community wouldn't need to go around trying to convince us otherwise!
its nothing but a gloried tournament for the Aussies playing NZ but needing to play a bunch of warm up games against minor countries

its a joke at best, you guys have the right to sue for false advertising, world cup,
it should be advertised as follows
AUS VS NZ, ,featuring a bunch of countries, that could muster up a few amateur's & several NRL players to play the might of AUS or NZ

:_<> :_<> :_<>

come see us when
an Australian side gets to play someone .... anyone ...in an international game of fumbles & bumbles
when... you can sellout a phone box over seas :_<> :_<>

& when your codes players can get paid to play somewhere .... anywhere ..... outside of this country

til then


we shit on your bumbling crap sport internationally

This x 1000.
the jealousy of derpball fans is very amusing ..rant rave stamp their feet.
nothing they do will change the fact that they CANT watch a team from their chosen sport play against another team from Overseas(No no no Tasmania is not overseas.)
They will never know the joy/horror/thrill of watching your players do battle with the old common enemy...NZ & England..

I guess a 4 & 20 sausage roll will have to do as Comfort food.

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

by somewhere do you mean 500 people crowds?

wanna know where RLWC was after 10 years? 1960 RLWC (6 years after inception) 33k final match. WHY CANT AFL DO THAT??? piece of shit sport with no international relevance. that's why.

and next week you'll be seeing some more records broken as Old Trafford sells out to 75k.

NRL started off in England to begin with & Union is popular in England, so if the Final doesn't sell out, it will only prove to be a bigger joke than what it already is.
so after 50 years of having a world cup, you have Australia, NZ & maybe England a distance, are the dominate sides & the rest are there to just make up the numbers, so for dumb fucks like you can go around trying to convince every one that there is a RLWC.

and talking about figures 170 odd of the players in the RLCW play in the NRL. >
if it was such a success the NRl community wouldn't need to go around trying to convince us otherwise!
its nothing but a gloried tournament for the Aussies playing NZ but needing to play a bunch of warm up games against minor countries

its a joke at best, you guys have the right to sue for false advertising, world cup,
it should be advertised as follows
AUS VS NZ, ,featuring a bunch of countries, that could muster up a few amateur's & several NRL players to play the might of AUS or NZ

:_<> :_<> :_<>

come see us when
an Australian side gets to play someone .... anyone ...in an international game of fumbles & bumbles
when... you can sellout a phone box over seas :_<> :_<>

& when your codes players can get paid to play somewhere .... anywhere ..... outside of this country

til then


we shit on your bumbling crap sport internationally

This x 1000.
the jealousy of derpball fans is very amusing ..rant rave stamp their feet.
nothing they do will change the fact that they CANT watch a team from their chosen sport play against another team from Overseas(No no no Tasmania is not overseas.)
They will never know the joy/horror/thrill of watching your players do battle with the old common enemy...NZ & England..

I guess a 4 & 20 sausage roll will have to do as Comfort food.

Each sport offers unique positives. Cricket has a fantastic international competition but cricket fans do not know the joy of a vibrant national competition because that aspect is largely ignored.

RL has a modest international schedule in comparison, but a far better national competition.

The AFL has no international schedule but a thriving national competition.

Which is better? Depends on what you prefer I'd suggest.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Well I can safely say that Dave's mockery will come back and bite him hard because in a generation I expect Australia to have a proper competitor. Why? Because the AFL is interested in putting resources into international development. Rugby league couldn't give a stuff.

Oh and here's something I just thought of. If rugby league is so good internationally, why isn't it an Olympic sport??

I can't wait for the excuses in reply here!

adamj1300 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Well I can safely say that Dave's mockery will come back and bite him hard because in a generation I expect Australia to have a proper competitor. Why? Because the AFL is interested in putting resources into international development. Rugby league couldn't give a stuff.

Oh and here's something I just thought of. If rugby league is so good internationally, why isn't it an Olympic sport??

I can't wait for the excuses in reply here!

as well NRLCRAP1, if its so big internationally, why is Australia the most dominate team since the WC cup has started, no other team is close? of all the players competing 170 of them are from the NRL, that's just over half the players competing in the world cup?

adamj1300 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

by somewhere do you mean 500 people crowds?

wanna know where RLWC was after 10 years? 1960 RLWC (6 years after inception) 33k final match. WHY CANT AFL DO THAT??? piece of shit sport with no international relevance. that's why.

and next week you'll be seeing some more records broken as Old Trafford sells out to 75k.

NRL started off in England to begin with & Union is popular in England, so if the Final doesn't sell out, it will only prove to be a bigger joke than what it already is.
so after 50 years of having a world cup, you have Australia, NZ & maybe England a distance, are the dominate sides & the rest are there to just make up the numbers, so for dumb fucks like you can go around trying to convince every one that there is a RLWC.

and talking about figures 170 odd of the players in the RLCW play in the NRL. >
if it was such a success the NRl community wouldn't need to go around trying to convince us otherwise!
its nothing but a gloried tournament for the Aussies playing NZ but needing to play a bunch of warm up games against minor countries

its a joke at best, you guys have the right to sue for false advertising, world cup,
it should be advertised as follows
AUS VS NZ, ,featuring a bunch of countries, that could muster up a few amateur's & several NRL players to play the might of AUS or NZ

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Well I can safely say that Dave's mockery will come back and bite him hard because in a generation I expect Australia to have a proper competitor. Why? Because the AFL is interested in putting resources into international development. Rugby league couldn't give a stuff.

pHyR3 wrote:

well it's been 10 years and it hasn't gotten anywhere. even leageu was pulling bigger crowds after 10 years of 30k, and it's improved on that dramatically with 75k+ crowds in the last 10 years.

i think AFL IC will alwyas be in 'development stage' lol