Talking Footy

:_<> :_<>

the fumblers


smashed again

what is that now

13 times in the last week
when will these cockheads learn ....... when :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

:_<> :_<>

the fumblers


smashed again

what is that now

13 times in the last week
when will these cockheads learn ....... when :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

:_<> :_<>

the fumblers


smashed again

what is that now

13 times in the last week
when will these cockheads learn ....... when :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all.

your lady boy convention was destroyed .....

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

:_<> :_<>

the fumblers


smashed again

what is that now

13 times in the last week
when will these cockheads learn ....... when :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all.

your lady boy convention was destroyed .....

Firstly, the graph is searches I assume, not news stories, so the original data stands. Secondly, the graph supports the AFL draft as easily the most consistently searched topic.

the blue one is rugby league world cup, it registered 100 on the scale and AFL draft registerd something like 30 from memory. and rlwc 27 or so.

once you include worldwide it is more like 100 rugby league world cup, 35 rlwc, 25 AFL draft.

and yep, searches not news. but i'd prefer more people being interested in something as opposed to having more journos interested.

also, "the original data still stands."

just rechecked what you posted.

when i search in google search NEWS:
rlwc = 16.3k hits
AFL draft = 23,200 hits
rugby league world cup = 1.24 MILLION hits.

google search news last 24hrs for me stops giving me the number of hits... maybe you can do it but search rugby league world cup, not rlwc.


thanks for playing, see ya later.

and your other point "You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all."

interest overall internationally records '5' for AFL draft, '5' for rugby league world cup, and 1 for rlwc. so 6 vs 5 for RLWC.

interest in australia is 12 vs 6 in your favour. except your event has happened 9 times since the beginning of the data. and twice for us. i would say having bigger peaks is more important since you have an inherent advantage for an event that happens every year in something that averages data from years where there is no RLWC.

pHyR3 wrote:

also, "the original data still stands."

just rechecked what you posted.

when i search in google search NEWS:
rlwc = 16.3k hits
AFL draft = 23,200 hits
rugby league world cup = 1.24 MILLION hits.

google search news last 24hrs for me stops giving me the number of hits... maybe you can do it but search rugby league world cup, not rlwc.


thanks for playing, see ya later.

and your other point "You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all."

interest overall internationally records '5' for AFL draft, '5' for rugby league world cup, and 1 for rlwc. so 6 vs 5 for RLWC.

interest in australia is 12 vs 6 in your favour. except your event has happened 9 times since the beginning of the data. and twice for us. i would say having bigger peaks is more important since you have an inherent advantage for an event that happens every year in something that averages data from years where there is no RLWC.

I gather your searches were world wide? My news searches were from google.com.au, indicating interest in Australia. Given the AFL draft was about 4 times as popular I'd suggest the media in a Australia believe the AFL draft is far more newsworthy

But but but but but
But wouldn't the AFL draft be of interest Overseas ,seeing as (claimed by some handicapped posters on here),that it is a bigger game internationally.
BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

But but but but but
But wouldn't the AFL draft be of interest Overseas ,seeing as (claimed by some handicapped posters on here),that it is a bigger game internationally.
BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

I never said the AFL draft would produce more interest world wide

I'm fine with it attracting far more interest in Australia than the RLWC

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

But but but but but
But wouldn't the AFL draft be of interest Overseas ,seeing as (claimed by some handicapped posters on here),that it is a bigger game internationally.
BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

I never said the AFL draft would produce more interest world wide

I'm fine with it attracting far more interest in Australia than the RLWC

:_<> :_<>
it does neither fuckwit

you've been made look like a twat :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

But but but but but
But wouldn't the AFL draft be of interest Overseas ,seeing as (claimed by some handicapped posters on here),that it is a bigger game internationally.
BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

I never said the AFL draft would produce more interest world wide

I'm fine with it attracting far more interest in Australia than the RLWC

:_<> :_<>
it does neither fuckwit

you've been made look like a twat :_<> :_<>

It certainly does, however I'm not surprised you can't understand it.

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

also, "the original data still stands."

just rechecked what you posted.

when i search in google search NEWS:
rlwc = 16.3k hits
AFL draft = 23,200 hits
rugby league world cup = 1.24 MILLION hits.

google search news last 24hrs for me stops giving me the number of hits... maybe you can do it but search rugby league world cup, not rlwc.


thanks for playing, see ya later.

and your other point "You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all."

interest overall internationally records '5' for AFL draft, '5' for rugby league world cup, and 1 for rlwc. so 6 vs 5 for RLWC.

interest in australia is 12 vs 6 in your favour. except your event has happened 9 times since the beginning of the data. and twice for us. i would say having bigger peaks is more important since you have an inherent advantage for an event that happens every year in something that averages data from years where there is no RLWC.

I gather your searches were world wide? My news searches were from google.com.au, indicating interest in Australia. Given the AFL draft was about 4 times as popular I'd suggest the media in a Australia believe the AFL draft is far more newsworthy

searching from .com.au, doesn't elimiate global hits to my knowledge. It just presents a different version of results which is more likely what you're searching for if you're in Australia.

You can select only from australia, just as you can select only from last 24hours.

But for me, once I've selected that it stops showing how many results pop up.

Going by your figures, since AFL draft narrowly beats rlwc. Once you include rugby league world cup (a more common term for news articles and people searching it up) it will smash AFL draft.

i tried it out with bing news search, selecting 'only from australia' (no option for last 24 hours)
pops up with 13.7k hits
AFL draft 2.7k hits

I'm not gonna trust bing, and i wouldn't expect you to either but like i said google doesn't let me see number of hits after selecting those options.

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

also, "the original data still stands."

just rechecked what you posted.

when i search in google search NEWS:
rlwc = 16.3k hits
AFL draft = 23,200 hits
rugby league world cup = 1.24 MILLION hits.

google search news last 24hrs for me stops giving me the number of hits... maybe you can do it but search rugby league world cup, not rlwc.


thanks for playing, see ya later.

and your other point "You're not suggesting that graph supports the RLWC are you? Two blips but absolutely smashed for interest overall. Have a look at the bar graph on the left hand side. Says it all."

interest overall internationally records '5' for AFL draft, '5' for rugby league world cup, and 1 for rlwc. so 6 vs 5 for RLWC.

interest in australia is 12 vs 6 in your favour. except your event has happened 9 times since the beginning of the data. and twice for us. i would say having bigger peaks is more important since you have an inherent advantage for an event that happens every year in something that averages data from years where there is no RLWC.

I gather your searches were world wide? My news searches were from google.com.au, indicating interest in Australia. Given the AFL draft was about 4 times as popular I'd suggest the media in a Australia believe the AFL draft is far more newsworthy

searching from .com.au, doesn't elimiate global hits to my knowledge. It just presents a different version of results which is more likely what you're searching for if you're in Australia.

You can select only from australia, just as you can select only from last 24hours.

But for me, once I've selected that it stops showing how many results pop up.

Going by your figures, since AFL draft narrowly beats rlwc. Once you include rugby league world cup (a more common term for news articles and people searching it up) it will smash AFL draft.

AFL draft and RLWC are only two terms. You've expanded RLWC but not included other options like AFL national draft.

rlwc is not commonly used outside of forums like this especially not by news articles. also, i assume that AFL national draft incorporates AFL draft as it is a subset of AFL draft. that logic would only apply for the 'google trends' thing which measures searches by entry term.

i'll check it now.

at the moment the data says:

rugby league world cup = 100
rlwc = 28
AFL draft = 20
AFL national draft = 1

for australia:

rugby league world cup = 100
AFL draft = 51
rlwc = 33
AFL national draft = 2

So, you can add 'AFL national draft' to your total and we'll add rlwc to the rugby league world cup one.
133 vs 53 in AUSTRALIA.

i could also try 'rugby league' and 'aussie rules' but that might crush you a bit too hard...