Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Can any of the fumblederps post what the crowd was for the last England V NZ AFL game in England ..so we can compare .
Im sure cos would have the number

Wasn't it a double header?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Can any of the fumblederps post what the crowd was for the last England V NZ AFL game in England ..so we can compare .
Im sure cos would have the number

Wasn't it a double header?

are you suggesting over 60,000 there last night weren't there for England alone
would 60 attend a fumble bumble ball game between these 2 nations .... its a legit question ?

i'd guess maybe..... if they play their cards right

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Can any of the fumblederps post what the crowd was for the last England V NZ AFL game in England ..so we can compare .
Im sure cos would have the number

Wasn't it a double header?

are you suggesting over 60,000 there last night weren't there for England alone
would 60 attend a fumble bumble ball game between these 2 nations .... its a legit question ?

i'd guess maybe..... if they play their cards right

So 60k for the England game and 7k for the Kangawhos?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Can any of the fumblederps post what the crowd was for the last England V NZ AFL game in England ..so we can compare .
Im sure cos would have the number

Wasn't it a double header?

are you suggesting over 60,000 there last night weren't there for England alone
would 60 attend a fumble bumble ball game between these 2 nations .... its a legit question ?

i'd guess maybe..... if they play their cards right

So 60k for the England game and 7k for the Kangawhos?

7k aussies in attendance .. yes that's probably right

now the question we asked
could your sport .. the tiniest on the planet ........... with the same sides playing , attract 1/1,000 of the interest of RL's in England ?

any thoughts

Much to the delight of the enthusiastic crowd of about 10,000 Londoners, the Dogs snapped out of their funk and kicked the next four goals to seemingly have victory assured.

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right. Ignore my call out and try to claim it's something else entirely.

So I will make it clear. You insinuated that Fiji got it's new deal as a result of the USA/Australia semi final!!

Now - try again, and this time address the point instead of running around it.

right, calling someone a double ****** after they said you're a ****** is an amazing comeback....

No you imbecile, if you had basic comprehension skills you could realise that I was talking about Fiji's campaign throughout the RLWC. only a ****** such as yourself would assume someone said Aus vs USA = Fiji sponsorship when Fiji is playin in the same tournament and made the semi final in front of just under 70 thousand people in london.

And as for the running away, i actually have a life mate. i dont just sit around correcting ********* like yourself all day. was somewhat entertaining reading your dribble at the beginning but is somewhat sadenning seeing people like you who presumaably vote (unless your 14 which isn't unlikely)

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Can any of the fumblederps post what the crowd was for the last England V NZ AFL game in England ..so we can compare .
Im sure cos would have the number

Wasn't it a double header?

are you suggesting over 60,000 there last night weren't there for England alone
would 60 attend a fumble bumble ball game between these 2 nations .... its a legit question ?

i'd guess maybe..... if they play their cards right

So 60k for the England game and 7k for the Kangawhos?

7k aussies in attendance .. yes that's probably right

now the question we asked
could your sport .. the tiniest on the planet ........... with the same sides playing , attract 1/1,000 of the interest of RL's in England ?

any thoughts

Hmmmm,

Much to the delight of the enthusiastic crowd of about 10,000 Londoners, the Dogs snapped out of their funk and kicked the next four goals to seemingly have victory assured.

http://www.webcitation.org/6EXt8RWD9

10k for an exhibition game beats 7k for a RLWC semifinal

Xman wrote:

Dave, you claimed 60k went to watch the England v NZ game and 7k to the Australia game. Disappointing crowd when an AFL exhibition game got more fans. :_<>

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dave, you claimed 60k went to watch the England v NZ game and 7k to the Australia game. Disappointing crowd when an AFL exhibition game got more fans. :_<>

where did an AFL exhibition get more fans??

I dunno what RD is on about but 67,000 turned up for 2 games. Some for both, some for 1.

Same thing happens with music festivals like Big Day Out, 100k might turn up in the day and that is the figure presented. people don't go around counting how many for Band A, Band B etc. etc. cause it doesn't matter. all they care about is that they sold 100k tickets and 100k (or maybe slightly under) turned up.

Similarly, 67k for 2 games. The official statistics simply count total attendance and divide by games thereby halving this figure. It might have bee 66k NZ vs Eng, 1k Australia vs Fiji, or 40k and 27k or 33k and 34k. It simply doesn't matter.

pHyR3 wrote:

right, calling someone a double ****** after they said you're a ****** is an amazing comeback....

No you imbecile, if you had basic comprehension skills you could realise that I was talking about Fiji's campaign throughout the RLWC. only a ****** such as yourself would assume someone said Aus vs USA = Fiji sponsorship when Fiji is playin in the same tournament and made the semi final in front of just under 70 thousand people in london.

And as for the running away, i actually have a life mate. i dont just sit around correcting ********* like yourself all day. was somewhat entertaining reading your dribble at the beginning but is somewhat sadenning seeing people like you who presumaably vote (unless your 14 which isn't unlikely)