Page 3 of 6

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:46 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
invented by anglo irish drunks

It was invented by two New South Welshmen free settlers.

& 8-[
they were from

England

&

Ireland


&


were drunks


the last bit speaks for itself ... how else can anyone explain this as a sober person couldn't invent such a ridiculous game :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:10 pm
by NRLCrap1
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Ignorance thy name is Dave.

Even if the AFL numbers are a bit down they are still streets ahead of the NRL!

Hell, look at the home and away season averages for the last five years;

Code: Select all

     AFL   NRL
2013 32163 15940
2012 31509 16423
2011 34893 16273
2010 36908 16406
2009 36193 16069
The smart people of the world will see those figures and know straight away who's in trouble. And it's not the AFL.
hmmmm
so 36908
to
31509

is goin busters eh :-k

8-[

:?>

:(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


220,000 less spectators in 2013 then in 2010
& this is with an extra 22 games played

now

lets take those 22 games away & their 32K a match & compare this year & 2013 shall we ( ie 176 games per year each ) :cool:

2010
6,495,808

2013
5,660,688

a fall of 835,120.......... in just 3 years :shock:

8-[

:-k


the analysis
VFL is fucked ............ :cool:
Analysis based in a fallacy because there is no way anyone can predict what the crowd numbers would have been like if there were less games. The average dropped because of two brand new clubs trying to establish themselves. GWS were bound to bring the average down by themselves. Hell even I admit that a lot of their home crowds were down amongst the NRL's worst.

You on the other hand, Dave, won't admit to anything real. AFL average of 31,000 is an average that the NRL can only dream of. That's why it's going gangbusters.

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:16 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Ignorance thy name is Dave.

Even if the AFL numbers are a bit down they are still streets ahead of the NRL!

Hell, look at the home and away season averages for the last five years;

Code: Select all

     AFL   NRL
2013 32163 15940
2012 31509 16423
2011 34893 16273
2010 36908 16406
2009 36193 16069
The smart people of the world will see those figures and know straight away who's in trouble. And it's not the AFL.
hmmmm
so 36908
to
31509

is goin busters eh :-k

8-[

:?>

:(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


220,000 less spectators in 2013 then in 2010
& this is with an extra 22 games played

now

lets take those 22 games away & their 32K a match & compare this year & 2013 shall we ( ie 176 games per year each ) :cool:

2010
6,495,808

2013
5,660,688

a fall of 835,120.......... in just 3 years :shock:

8-[

:-k


the analysis
VFL is fucked ............ :cool:
there is no way anyone can predict what the crowd numbers would have been like if there were less games.
.

well :-k
Im sure they'd of expected more spectators overall with .............. more games.. don't ya think fuckhead ? :-k

but alas
they have many hundreds of thousands ............... less :shock:

the hard numbers don't lie & they say
the VFL is .... disappearing up its own arse :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol:

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:22 pm
by NRLCrap1
Nope, we still have much bigger crowds than the NRL.

So it's the NRL disappearing up it's own arse.

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:52 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Nope

.
no no no no


Image

8-[

:(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

what a fuckhead :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:06 pm
by adamj1300
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Nope, we still have much bigger crowds than the NRL.

So it's the NRL disappearing up it's own arse.
with its delusional fans

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:29 pm
by NRLCrap1
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Nope

.
no no no no


Image
Go back to where you came from, or you get a spanking you naughty child! :D

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:50 pm
by Fred
Dave has a lot of pictures of young children that he posts rather regularly ?

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:53 am
by Swans4ever
Yes rather scary really if it's not toddlers its pre-school children I hope the Feds are monitoring!

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:49 am
by NRLCrap1
HA! Well he resides in a basement like those oxygen thieves do, right?

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:24 pm
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:
Dave has a lot of pictures of young children that he posts rather regularly ?

yes
we know that arouses you fumblers eh :-k

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:28 pm
by Raiderdave
Swans4ever wrote:
toddlers & pre-school children for me!
except when they're islander kids eh you racist cockhead ?
eeeerrrrrrrr... dark people :?

wow
what a slime bag [-X [-X [-( [-( [-( [-( [-(

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:30 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
HA! Well he resides in a basement like those oxygen thieves do, right?

& our resident cheese grater strikes again Image

:(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:33 pm
by Swans4ever
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
toddlers & pre-school children for me!
except when they're islander kids eh you racist cockhead ?
eeeerrrrrrrr... dark people :?

wow
what a slime bag [-X [-X [-( [-( [-( [-( [-(
Yeah a slime bag like you who does nothing but search the net for pictures of kids! RD you sick twisted fuck!

Re: Article from the roar

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:26 pm
by NRLCrap1
Dave that is not a cheese grater. It grates more than that, like your apology for a brain.