Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

Dear lordy! Ok Ima gunna make this nice and simple and clear.

swines wrote:

1st I said I wanted to know the shopkeepers version and then I hypothesised that that could be a high crime area for aborigine youth - he may have been robbed by someone

The only reason a shopkeeper should have kicked ANY ONE CITIZEN out of his store would be if they had robbed the place before. To kick someone out, who is Aboriginal, because there is a high rate of 'Aboriginal' crime in an area, is quite simply, racist.

If you dont get this swines, and it all but appears you totally dont, then there's no point continuing. Your hyposthesis illustrates an underlying assumption that it would be ok for a shopkeeper to deny entrance to an Aboriginal person if other Aboriginal people had been involved in crime in the area. Sorry but...that would be undeniably a racist action.

Acknowledge this swines or remain on very thin ice. And dont go on your old rant that we dont know the full story, of course we dont. I'm talking about the premise of what you've said about crime rates and your hypothesis here swinesey boy.

Time to admit that premise is wrong.

Kind regards,
Your advisor,
King-Eliagh

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Dear lordy! Ok Ima gunna make this nice and simple and clear.

swines wrote:

1st I said I wanted to know the shopkeepers version and then I hypothesised that that could be a high crime area for aborigine youth - he may have been robbed by someone

The only reason a shopkeeper should have kicked ANY ONE CITIZEN out of his store would be if they had robbed the place before. To kick someone out, who is Aboriginal, because there is a high rate of 'Aboriginal' crime in an area, is quite simply, racist.

If you dont get this swines, and it all but appears you totally dont, then there's no point continuing. Your hyposthesis illustrates an underlying assumption that it would be ok for a shopkeeper to deny entrance to an Aboriginal person if other Aboriginal people had been involved in crime in the area. Sorry but...that would be undeniably a racist action.

Acknowledge this swines or remain on very thin ice. And dont go on your old rant that we dont know the full story, of course we dont. I'm talking about the premise of what you've said about crime rates and your hypothesis here swinesey boy.

Time to admit that premise is wrong.

Kind regards,
Your advisor,
King-Eliagh

I never said I would agree with ANYONE being kicked out of a store because of their race

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Dear lordy! Ok Ima gunna make this nice and simple and clear.

swines wrote:

1st I said I wanted to know the shopkeepers version and then I hypothesised that that could be a high crime area for aborigine youth - he may have been robbed by someone

The only reason a shopkeeper should have kicked ANY ONE CITIZEN out of his store would be if they had robbed the place before. To kick someone out, who is Aboriginal, because there is a high rate of 'Aboriginal' crime in an area, is quite simply, racist.

If you dont get this swines, and it all but appears you totally dont, then there's no point continuing. Your hyposthesis illustrates an underlying assumption that it would be ok for a shopkeeper to deny entrance to an Aboriginal person if other Aboriginal people had been involved in crime in the area. Sorry but...that would be undeniably a racist action.

Acknowledge this swines or remain on very thin ice. And dont go on your old rant that we dont know the full story, of course we dont. I'm talking about the premise of what you've said about crime rates and your hypothesis here swinesey boy.

Time to admit that premise is wrong.

Kind regards,
Your advisor,
King-Eliagh

I never said I would agree with ANYONE being kicked out of a store because of their race

yeah ya did

you're a racist pole smoker

QueerISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Dear lordy! Ok Ima gunna make this nice and simple and clear.

swines wrote:

1st I said I wanted to know the shopkeepers version and then I hypothesised that that could be a high crime area for aborigine youth - he may have been robbed by someone

The only reason a shopkeeper should have kicked ANY ONE CITIZEN out of his store would be if they had robbed the place before. To kick someone out, who is Aboriginal, because there is a high rate of 'Aboriginal' crime in an area, is quite simply, racist.

If you dont get this swines, and it all but appears you totally dont, then there's no point continuing. Your hyposthesis illustrates an underlying assumption that it would be ok for a shopkeeper to deny entrance to an Aboriginal person if other Aboriginal people had been involved in crime in the area. Sorry but...that would be undeniably a racist action.

Acknowledge this swines or remain on very thin ice. And dont go on your old rant that we dont know the full story, of course we dont. I'm talking about the premise of what you've said about crime rates and your hypothesis here swinesey boy.

Time to admit that premise is wrong.

Kind regards,
Your advisor,
King-Eliagh

I never said I would agree with ANYONE being kicked out of a store because of their race

yeah ya did

you're a racist pole smoker

Im waiting for you in my basement raider

Raiderdave wrote:

QueerISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Dear lordy! Ok Ima gunna make this nice and simple and clear.

swines wrote:

1st I said I wanted to know the shopkeepers version and then I hypothesised that that could be a high crime area for aborigine youth - he may have been robbed by someone

The only reason a shopkeeper should have kicked ANY ONE CITIZEN out of his store would be if they had robbed the place before. To kick someone out, who is Aboriginal, because there is a high rate of 'Aboriginal' crime in an area, is quite simply, racist.

If you dont get this swines, and it all but appears you totally dont, then there's no point continuing. Your hyposthesis illustrates an underlying assumption that it would be ok for a shopkeeper to deny entrance to an Aboriginal person if other Aboriginal people had been involved in crime in the area. Sorry but...that would be undeniably a racist action.

Acknowledge this swines or remain on very thin ice. And dont go on your old rant that we dont know the full story, of course we dont. I'm talking about the premise of what you've said about crime rates and your hypothesis here swinesey boy.

Time to admit that premise is wrong.

Kind regards,
Your advisor,
King-Eliagh

I never said I would agree with ANYONE being kicked out of a store because of their race

yeah ya did

you're a racist pole smoker

Im waiting for you in my basement raider

I had to edit your post, because i'm a total homo, and i want you pleasure me sexually