Talking Footy

No sign of Eliagh. Says plenty.

Another entry into the things Dave makes up. Everyone is blind and only he knows the true numbers of crowd figures!!!

RD - said HARRY KEWELL is a Sydney boy who wouldn't be caught dead at the fumbles and bumbles being the Suns game against Collingwood - well he was dead wrong - he has been called and now is running from the truth - MAN UP RD - c'mon RD man admit you were wrong!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ahhh > In case you didnt notice sarcasm is a word which has a meaning and it is very well known that sarcasm is particularly noticeable due to the tone used, which varies from culture to culture.

I'm afraid you simply didnt understand this nrl You even went and said as such! :_<>

I would very much appreciate it if you could demonstrate tone on this forum.

I can't wait for this answer! Should be worth a belly laugh or twenty!

You're not serious right?

You've just validated my initial point I.e that sarcasm is difficult to detect on an Internet forum, as well as further prove you don't understand what sarcasm is! Alls in the first sentence!

Thanks crap

Further "prove"????

Oh deary me, your grammar admirably demonstrates your comprehension skills! Validation? No my poor under educated fool, you only validated your inability to admit you were wrong. Much like Dave "Allen" in that respect.

"King" indeed. You should abdicate, Your Minesty (pun intended)

Just thought I would bring this back

NRLCrap1 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

No I don't because it's not. That's more proof that you don't understand sarcasm.

:_<> Goooooottcha! Tone is a massively important part of sarcasm. I'm afraid ol crap boy, you've just shown all and sundry that you don't understand sarcasm!

I take back my last comment, you never got me at all you stoopid dumbo!

I did get you because you still don't get it. Since when did tone have anything to do with the written word?

Good one Phelpsy,

Maybe we can educate Ncrapper on sarcasm a bit more.

Here is a definition of sarcasm for you illiterate one. Note point 2

sarcasm (ˈsɑːkæzəm)
n
1. mocking, contemptuous, or ironic language intended to convey scorn or insult
2. the use or tone of such language

Seeing its impossible to demonstrate tone in the typed word it makes a mockery of your statement

Point one can work alone, goose! Go back to sleep!

Here's the total list now from this thread and from his latest mind numbing stupidity;

1. Crowd figures : states over and over a crowd figure that is miles under actual figure. No alternate source for this information just what he thinks it is from watching on tv

2. Ticket prices : Insists AFL tickets ate available to all and sundry for 2.50??

3. No one cares about AF north of the Murray (one of GiantRD's favourites!)

4. AFL is DEAD in south Australia.

5. NRL is nationally Australia's game

6. In Sydney, 26000 is a good crowd if it is an nrl game reflecting how great the game is going but a poor crowd if it is the swans, reflecting how poorly supported the game is ???

7. Everyone is blind and only he knows the true numbers of crowd figures!!!

8. HARRY KEWELL is a Sydney boy who wouldn't be caught dead at the fumbles and bumbles being the Suns game against Collingwood

9. VFL is not Australian & is infact Japanese

10. NRL now America's national sport

11. RL has more juniors in Vic then VFL

12. No one likes VFL anywhere on earth

13. RL now the most popular sport in Vic

14. VFL the least followed sport in Australia

15. There is junior rugby league played in Victoria, SA, WA and Tasmania

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Point one can work alone!

Not really, I think you need to go back to school Dumbo. Tell me without hearing my voice, was I just being sarcastic in that last sentence?

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Go back to sleep!

That aint gonna happen Dumbo. We are all awake to your stupidity and will take every opportunity to point it out.

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Point one can work alone!

Not really, I think you need to go back to school Dumbo. Tell me without hearing my voice, was I just being sarcastic in that last sentence?

No, you were being intentionally rude and obnoxious. A giveaway for a whine.

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Go back to sleep!

That aint gonna happen Dumbo. We are all awake to your stupidity and will take every opportunity to point it out.

Your interpretation of stupidity is so lacking in education it's unbelievable.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Point one can work alone!

Not really, I think you need to go back to school Dumbo. Tell me without hearing my voice, was I just being sarcastic in that last sentence?

No, you were being intentionally rude and obnoxious. A giveaway for a whine.

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Go back to sleep!

That aint gonna happen Dumbo. We are all awake to your stupidity and will take every opportunity to point it out.

Your interpretation of stupidity is so lacking in education it's unbelievable.

Point 1. I was being sarcastic, I don't really think you should go back to school (See you cant tell). Point proven.

Point 2. Nothing wrong with my interpretation. I wise man once said. "Stupid is as stupid does" That could have been said just for you

Point 1. You don't know the difference between sarcasm and abuse. Point not proven. Besides, in order to fulfill the "tone" aspect you have to get the words right first. If you were saying what you said in a sarcastic tone, then I was right. You were whining.

Point 2. Plenty wrong with it, and you're too stupid to see that. Whether or not it was said for me is completely irrelevant.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Point 1. You don't know the difference between sarcasm and abuse. Point not proven. Besides, in order to fulfill the "tone" aspect you have to get the words right first. If you were saying what you said in a sarcastic tone, then I was right. You were whining.

Point 2. Plenty wrong with it, and you're too stupid to see that. Whether or not it was said for me is completely irrelevant.

You have no idea Dumbo, every time you write something you show your lack of intelligence.

Do go and look up the definition of whining before you use it again.

Read your point 2 and see if you can write it in a intelligent way.

Oh that's right, when I prove you wrong you go the abuse line all over again. Cheap, nasty and unintelligent.