Page 3 of 4
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:20 pm
by Swans4ever
Being precious again GiantsRD!
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:25 pm
by Swans4ever
Raiderdave wrote:Swans4ever wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

So earlier in the year when the Giants outdrew the Raiders Canberra was officially an Aussie Rules city? This is your argument?
jesus what a dick
a) that crowd was fudged .. it was 8K
b) it was once in 6 attempts
the nrl has outdone the vfl on the 2 occasions it has gone to darwin
that's
2/2
& the debate ends ........ here !!

Jesus what a manipulating wanker - 200 people more and its a RL hartland -what a load of crap now lets hear your usual crap - singlet bumblers etc etc
Nothing but regurgitated garbage from the most boring place on earth ! Come on GiantsRD post ur usual dribble!
but but but
its bumbles heartland ... isn't it ?

>
:_<> :_<>

But you told us because 200 more people attended one match it is now RL hartland didn't you? No wonder soccer's taking over you traditional areas! Sydney Swans are the BIGGEST club in Sydney but I don't claim Sydney as AFL hart land (you noticed KE has not once disputed the fact Sydney Swans is the biggest club in Sydney - he knows he can't argue TV ratings alone over members, crowds and sponsors! Only GiantsRD is that stupid!)
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:52 am
by Fred
Pretty crap crowd again in Darwin. I'm not sure going yo Darwin is a good idea... Looks very amateurish and unprofessional to me. Like watching the nrl at those suburban grounds with grass hills.
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:06 am
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:Pretty crap crowd again in Darwin. I'm not sure going yo Darwin is a good idea... Looks very amateurish and unprofessional to me. Like watching the nrl at those suburban grounds with grass hills.
face it tool
Darwin is ours now
we've whopped yuz good 2 years in a row
take it off the list of bumbles cities
what does that leave yuz with now ?.... 3 !!

:_<> :_<>
the smallest sport on the planet ... just got smaller

:_<> :_<>
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:19 am
by Swans4ever
Raiderdave wrote:Phelpsy wrote:Pretty crap crowd again in Darwin. I'm not sure going yo Darwin is a good idea... Looks very amateurish and unprofessional to me. Like watching the nrl at those suburban grounds with grass hills.
face it tool
Darwin is ours now
we've whopped yuz good 2 years in a row
take it off the list of bumbles cities
what does that leave yuz with now ?.... 3 !!

:_<> :_<>
the smallest sport on the planet ... just got smaller

:_<> :_<>
How pathetic your claiming NT becuase in one game you got an extra couple hundred people - like I said before under a couple of thousand surely its a draw - they have their own team in the NEAFL maybe they prefer to follow them! I don't know but both codes don't get big crowds! And arn't you forgetting Tassy? Regular games there which are full to capacity at Launceston and Hobart - What was the last crowd there this season? Oh that's right havent played there have they! So again thats 4 (AFL) to 2 (NRL). Still losing!
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:55 am
by Fred
Swans, you expecting Dave to make sense? More fool you lol
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:05 am
by Swans4ever
Phelpsy wrote:Swans, you expecting Dave to make sense? More fool you lol
I know he won't but its really aimed at his minion you know eels, dogs etc (not 214 he makes some good points)
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:23 am
by NRLCrap1
Darwin is not the place to play any sport at this time of year. Their sporting time is their wet season; the summer months.
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:58 pm
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:Phelpsy wrote:Pretty crap crowd again in Darwin. I'm not sure going yo Darwin is a good idea... Looks very amateurish and unprofessional to me. Like watching the nrl at those suburban grounds with grass hills.
face it tool
Darwin is ours now
we've whopped yuz good 2 years in a row
take it off the list of bumbles cities
what does that leave yuz with now ?.... 3 !!

:_<> :_<>
the smallest sport on the planet ... just got smaller

:_<> :_<>
When we beat you in Cairns you combined two crowds and said you won because of total crowds. And yet here you are back claiming one crowd makes a victory. Make up your mind, hypocrite.
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 11:00 am
by Beaussie
Keep dreaming fool.

Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:30 pm
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Phelpsy wrote:Pretty crap crowd again in Darwin. I'm not sure going yo Darwin is a good idea... Looks very amateurish and unprofessional to me. Like watching the nrl at those suburban grounds with grass hills.
face it tool
Darwin is ours now
we've whopped yuz good 2 years in a row
take it off the list of bumbles cities
what does that leave yuz with now ?.... 3 !!

:_<> :_<>
the smallest sport on the planet ... just got smaller

:_<> :_<>
When we beat you in Cairns
what the F

>
the Fumbles & bumbles got 11K
the NRL..... 16K
jesus H
this lot get dumber by the day

:_<> :_<>

Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:14 pm
by NRLCrap1
Excuse me? When did the NRL play a game for premiership points in Cairns??
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:57 pm
by Swans4ever
This year they got 16 but where they play AFL is limited in capacity - it really isn't much of a issue it's more about the configuration of the ground for AFL - RD won't say the those things! By the way RD you going to admit yet that you were wrong about Harry K and the Suns - Cmon RD man up!
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:52 pm
by Raiderdave
Re: Darwin officially
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:53 pm
by Raiderdave
Swans4ever wrote:This year they got 16 but where they play AFL is limited in capacity -
but but
but but but
but but but

:_<> :_<>
