Talking Footy

piesman2011 wrote:

You missed the second game eels it was 22k. This game was 23,690.

hmmmmm.......... what was yr prediction again ?


40K






FMD

eelofwest wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

only

60,000 empty seats

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

VFL killing it in sydney eh lads

seriously

pack up & FUCK OFF

yuz are done

Wow Dave it was a worse crowd then first thought, what have we been saying for some time now? AFL on the decline in sydney.

22k wow that is a worry for the AFL no doubt...................terrible day for the battle of the bridge............

BTW spewie last years game got 38k at ANZ, that is a drop of 16k...............staggering...

its astounding eels

I tried to warn them
I'd heard through a mate who works for the stadium mid last week
he said its a ghost town for ticket sales .... theres nothing doing ... zip

Then Andy Ididaphoo also flagged a dissapointing turnout was imminent armed with the above same info

but these delusional fuckheads ... just ploughed on with ridiculous suggestions about what the crowd would be
they are just clueless

Ol Raider taught them a lesson again ... as he always does
and it was free of charge
no thanks required

Stewie wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

only

60,000 empty seats

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

VFL killing it in sydney eh lads

seriously

pack up & FUCK OFF

yuz are done

Wow Dave it was a worse crowd then first thought, what have we been saying for some time now? AFL on the decline in sydney.

22k wow that is a worry for the AFL no doubt...................terrible day for the battle of the bridge............

BTW spewie last years game got 38k at ANZ, that is a drop of 16k...............staggering...

Looked like 30k, probably was 30k, ANZ Stadium official was an nRL fan and posted 23k.
.

whhaaaaaaaaaaaa
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

we got dudded

you are an assclown ..... unable to deal with reality
my post at 4.36pm yesterday summed the crowd up perfectly


OMG ............

Xman wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

You missed the second game eels it was 22k. This game was 23,690.

=D> =D>

The giants got a crowd 8k over the NRL average in Sydney,

& 40K under what a VFL game was attracting there just a few years back
VFL in Sydney .... in decline

adamj1300 wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

only

60,000 empty seats

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

VFL killing it in sydney eh lads

seriously

pack up & FUCK OFF

yuz are done

you guys would know what playing in front of empty seats, the NRL would be rapt with that many , seeing that there are usually 70,000 or 75,000 empty seats, at ANZ
23 k to the game is a good result as it was more than last year!
if the storm got 23k to a home game, oh hang on they never have, that's even after winning premierships and the world championship!

Wow Dave it was a worse crowd then first thought, what have we been saying for some time now? AFL on the decline in sydney.

22k wow that is a worry for the AFL no doubt...................terrible day for the battle of the bridge............

BTW spewie last years game got 38k at ANZ, that is a drop of 16k...............staggering...

so not only can't you spell

you can't post a reply properly either



somehow your post has come out on top of the persons you were replying too
F me
thats clever

try separating it so we can see more easily your dribble , & try putting it under the person's post you are replying to

K champ
now off to play with your leggo set & putty
theres a lad

Whilst I'm disappointed more of my fellow Swans fans didn't show (pathetic how many I know who hate ANZ and refuse to go), we still saw a bigger crowd for the AFL in Sydney last night than the local derby in the NRL last night.

BTW, was talking to some mates last night at the game who said they also went to Bulldogs vs Souths after getting free tickets at the Easter Show on Good Friday. Apparently NRL staff were handing out thousands of free tickets all day at the show.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

You missed the second game eels it was 22k. This game was 23,690.

=D> =D>

The giants got a crowd 8k over the NRL average in Sydney,

& 40K under what a VFL game was attracting there just a few years back
VFL in Sydney .... in decline

Swans home games got 60k. Great effort by the giants members and swans supporters in a 1st v last game.

Isnt that more than any NRL home and away game in Sydney?

Beaussie wrote:

Whilst I'm disappointed more of my fellow Swans fans didn't show (pathetic how many I know who hate ANZ and refuse to go), we still saw a bigger crowd for the AFL in Sydney last night than the local derby in the NRL last night.

BTW, was talking to some mates last night at the game who said they also went to Bulldogs vs Souths after getting free tickets at the Easter Show on Good Friday. Apparently NRL staff were handing out thousands of free tickets all day at the show.

midgets staff were also handing out freebies to the battle of the boggers at the easter show bearsy .... like confetti ... all week apparently

& this was the case to both games last year as well when they were played.
free tickets for school children ... & the family & fiends of Skoda employees , & in the end it was anyone with a pulse
& yet yesterday they still couldn't get to HALF of the 52K turnout for the NRL

& as for the sthn derby last night
a ground ova 60K capacity smaller then ANZ .... was 95% full with ova 20K fans

& you want to compare that
to the garbage ... inflated with freebies & stadium members .. crowd for the battle of the bumbling baboons
which was
a passionless
morbid
atmosphere less
game that essentially no one gave a fuck about

to the heaving crackling intensity at Shark Park ... the Dragons causing a huge upset in a great game

Victorian rules is all but dead in Sydney
yesterdays crowd .... the proof

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

=D> =D>

The giants got a crowd 8k over the NRL average in Sydney,

& 40K under what a VFL game was attracting there just a few years back
VFL in Sydney .... in decline

Swans home games got 60k.

the swines weren't there yesterday ?

oh thats right
they were

but 40K fans who were there a few years ago

weren't

VFL in Sydney ... in decline

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

& 40K under what a VFL game was attracting there just a few years back
VFL in Sydney .... in decline

Swans home games got 60k. Great effort by the giants members and swans supporters in a 1st v last game.

Isnt that more than any NRL home and away game in Sydney?

the swines weren't there yesterday ?

oh thats right
they were

but 40K fans who were there a few years ago

weren't

VFL in Sydney ... in decline

Yeah, a smaller number of swans supporters than normal were there because 1. It was an away game so their membership doesn't get them in, and 2. The match was last v first and expected to be a smashing like a first v last game almost always is.

What incentive was there for swans fans to pay general admission to watch an uncompetitive game?

All large crowds at ANZ have been swans home games v big Victorian club in games expected to be quality.

Yesterday's game definitely didnt fit any of those descriptions. What it did do was beat last years crowd =D>

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Swans home games got 60k. Great effort by the giants members and swans supporters in a 1st v last game.

Isnt that more than any NRL home and away game in Sydney?

the swines weren't there yesterday ?

oh thats right
they were

but 40K fans who were there a few years ago

weren't

VFL in Sydney ... in decline

Yeah, a smaller number of swans supporters than normal were there because 1. It was an away game so their membership doesn't get them in, and 2. The match was last v first and expected to be a smashing like a first v last game almost always is.

What incentive was there for swans fans to pay general admission to watch an uncompetitive game?

All large crowds at ANZ have been swans home games v big Victorian club in games expected to be quality.

Yesterday's game definitely didnt fit any of those descriptions. What it did do was beat last years crowd =D>

but but but

but but but but

but but

but but but

Knew you wouldn't have an answer to that post

so next week

the SCG

a sellout yeah ?
34,000 & not a seat spare for the premiers first game at home ?

I mean they have 32K members already .... & apparently only 300 of these are in Melbourne

its assured isn't it ...

Xman wrote:

Knew you wouldn't have an answer to that post

that was a post ?

it was a series of

but but but but but

& not a valid excuse anywhere .......................

you said 30K would be a good turnout

it was 23K
& its still just the best ever

you are a cockhead
& thats that really

Raiderdave wrote:

so next week

the SCG

a sellout yeah ?
34,000 & not a seat spare for the premiers first game at home ?

I mean they have 32K members already .... & apparently only 300 of these are in Melbourne

its assured isn't it ...

Sell out doesnt mean full. Are you really so stupid you don't know this?