Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

150k (Syd and Bris FTA and Fox) is no one is it

out of nearly 8 Million people
yes



yes it is

what about 30k for 7.5M

Xman wrote:

what about 30k for 7.5M

after 1 year
great result .............

the swines aren't that much ahead of that (75K for FTA & foxtel combined ) after 30 years

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

what about 30k for 7.5M

after 1 year
great result .............

the swines aren't that much ahead of that (75K for FTA & foxtel combined ) after 30 years

30k

there wouldnt be a single program rating less for all 3 cities combined, and the NRL is in prime time....

Xman wrote:

there wouldnt be a single program rating less for all 3 cities combined, and the NRL is in prime time....

combined when the storm aren't playing cockhead
its usaually around 50K when the storm play.
30K is the average for the Storm in melbourne alone on FTA achieved after 1 year
they had ratings as high as 80K last year alone in Melbourne


the swines still only get just 50K on FTA ... after 30 years

its really quite embarrasing for the Victorian game

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

there wouldnt be a single program rating less for all 3 cities combined, and the NRL is in prime time....

combined when the storm aren't playing cockhead
its usaually around 50K when the storm play.
30K is the average for the Storm in melbourne alone on FTA achieved after 1 year
they had ratings as high as 80K last year alone in Melbourne


the swines still only get just 50K on FTA ... after 30 years

its really quite embarrasing for the Victorian game

usually 50k..
why lie when its easily disproven?

they had 1 result above 40k, most in the 20's

combined when the storm aren't playing cockhead
its usaually around 50K when the storm play.
30K is the average for the Storm in melbourne alone on FTA achieved after 1 year
they had ratings as high as 80K last year alone in Melbourne


the swines still only get just 50K on FTA ... after 30 years

its really quite embarrasing for the Victorian game [/quote]
usually 50k..
why lie when its easily disproven?

they had 1 result above 40k, most in the 20's [/quote]

how shit would the ratings be for the storm if they wern't dominating the competition, with news limited now selling off the Storm, the Storm will fall completely off the radar. all that waste of space of free publicity they are given in the herald sun everyday. yet still cant generate any hype =D>
bye bye storm League back to a two 2 state national competition

How's this worked out for you guys so far.

Deal starts this weekend.

http://www.sommetsports.co.nz/

Looks ready to go.

Soccer, Beach Volleyball and Motorsport, all not brought to you by Sommet Sports, the world's least successful television station.

NZ get more FTA AFL than nsw get NRL!

No they don't, your comp's what 3/4 weeks in and the channel still hasn't got to air?

Secondly, if you had a brain in your head, you would realise that if the ARLC were willing to lose out financially then the NRL would've been completely fta.

Xman wrote:

NZ get more FTA AFL than nsw get NRL!

But still no one watches it

Xman wrote:

NZ get more FTA AFL than nsw get NRL!

That's a huge LOL.

.

whall15 wrote:

No they don't, your comp's what 3/4 weeks in and the channel still hasn't got to air?

Secondly, if you had a brain in your head, you would realise that if the ARLC were willing to lose out financially then the NRL would've been completely fta.

Not yet, but at 6 matches per round theyll only need one round to have more FTA games than NRL in NZ, and just over half a season for more in Australia

And yes, I realise the NRL arent in a good enough position financially to afford to show the NRL in NZ on FTA TV. Thems the breaks for such a poorly supported sport little money. They need every cent they can get

It won't matter what channey gayfl is shown on it will have no affect. If only Vict#rds knew what people in NZ thought about gayfl.