Talking Footy

dave got destroyed That's quite funny when you're referring to an argument about the capacity of a stadium.

Drac should have referred to capacity since our bet is specifically referring to the total crowd. He fukked up but I would never say dave 'destroyed' him he just put him in his place and provided the facts of the matter. Thanks dave

King-Eliagh wrote:

dave got destroyed That's quite funny when you're referring to an argument about the capacity of a stadium.

Drac should have referred to capacity since our bet is specifically referring to the total crowd. He fukked up but I would never say dave 'destroyed' him he just put him in his place and provided the facts of the matter. Thanks dave

So wait.

Drac said it seats 10K (and it does)
Dave said the capacity is 14.5K and went on about Drac stuffing up
We pointed out that it had 10K seats and put dave in his place
Dave went but but but
You went but but but

The only facts are the first three points. The rest is just your way of trying to manupulate the facts to your advantage with no real impact on the truth. I understand Dave doing what he does hes a very funny troll, however as someone who claims not to be a troll you're starting to disapoint me KE. I thought you were smarter then that.

Did you read any of the lead up and understand the context in which Drac said 10k seating? Sure 'seating' is correct. But we're talking about total crowd numbers in our bet. i'm not going to explain this again pies

I want you to try thinking some more pies. I'm starting to believe someone has hijacked your TF acc. Beaussie, can you check that pies' account hasnt been hijacked by a member of Xman's family or some bonehead AFL fan? The recent contrast in posting style is quite stark and suspicious...Pies used to read and follow a thread quite well...

King-Eliagh wrote:

Did you read any of the lead up and understand the context in which Drac said 10k seating? Sure 'seating' is correct. But we're talking about total crowd numbers in our bet. i'm not going to explain this again pies

I want you to try thinking some more pies. I'm starting to believe someone has hijacked your TF acc. Beaussie, can you check that pies' account hasnt been hijacked by a member of Xman's family or some bonehead AFL fan? The recent contrast in posting style is quite stark and suspicious...Pies used to read and follow a thread quite well...

Of course you were talking about crowd numbers and then Drac said Manuka has 10K seats. I get your point but it doesnt change the fact that he said 10K seats, you arguing doesnt change the facts. I know RD needs all the help he can get and I guess we can agree to disagree on this one.

10k seats is irrelevant in our bet you foolish man. The capacity is what is relevant, which is why RD appropriately highlighted Drac's mistake. Then all you simpletons narrowed it down to the 'seats', understandable with your narrow minds but this thread is about the bets not niminy piminy BS like 'seats'. Raider right, Drac wrong, K?

King-Eliagh wrote:

10k seats is irrelevant in our bet you foolish man. The capacity is what is relevant, which is why RD appropriately highlighted Drac's mistake. Then all you simpletons narrowed it down to the 'seats', understandable with your narrow minds but this thread is about the bets not niminy piminy BS like 'seats'. Raider right, Drac wrong, K?

Wrong and thats my last word on that.

no probs E

I just couldn't have this singlet wearing weasel Drac .... claiming Manuka has a capacity of 10K ( which is what he meant ) & somehow this impacted on your bet with him
when in fact the ground has an almost 50% higher capacity
you have to watch these sleaze bags in tight shorts .. they cannot be trusted , proof being Bearsy & Xmans disgraceful welching efforts lst year

the othe vicky kicky cheeleaders trying to claim the numb of seats in a venue that has both seats & standing ( grassed areas) is a valid point re capacity , is hilarious & proof of their complete ignorance about this... & most subjects