Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah because prior to gws playing their closest team was the swans Given there's a bit of culture for marngrook down there my bet is safe as houses that there'd be more than a few thou members down that way.

And stewie get back on twitter and ask your chum bum whether the nsw figure includes the act. Its what the AFL do and have done for some time. They amalgamate nsw and act as though its one big state. Quite disrespectful to the canberrans i must say, but hey it makes fools like you think the AFL is huuuuge in nsw, so i guess with submissive brainless sheep as supporters why wouldnt you exploit their naivety?

Submissive brainless sheep

Now get on twitter stewie and prove me right!

Yeah, prior to the Giants playing 3 games a year there plus a Nab Cup game.

The majority would be Giants members these days, unless they grew up as die hard Swans members in Sydney.

22,000 members in New South Wales

Bit frightened to ask your pal from NSW/ACT AFL the question stewie?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Bit frightened to ask your pal from NSW/ACT AFL the question stewie?

Asked them hours ago.

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Bit frightened to ask your pal from NSW/ACT AFL the question stewie?

Asked them hours ago.

Awesome. Good job stewie. We need to get to the bottom of this. Now I want no lies from you sonny jim, you got that!? Be honest and report exactly word for word what the man from NSW/ACT AFL says to you on this one. Nooooo funny business...k?

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah because prior to gws playing their closest team was the swans Given there's a bit of culture for marngrook down there my bet is safe as houses that there'd be more than a few thou members down that way.

And stewie get back on twitter and ask your chum bum whether the nsw figure includes the act. Its what the AFL do and have done for some time. They amalgamate nsw and act as though its one big state. Quite disrespectful to the canberrans i must say, but hey it makes fools like you think the AFL is huuuuge in nsw, so i guess with submissive brainless sheep as supporters why wouldnt you exploit their naivety?

Submissive brainless sheep

Now get on twitter stewie and prove me right!

but the ACT isnt Sydney. Why would thousands of people living in the ACT take out a membership for a team that doesnt play in their state (other than one off games)?

Youre full of BS

Dear God, you seem to be rapidly losing braincells Xman.. What's going on?

Ok case study number one. The SOUTH SYDNEY Rabbitohs. Membership 20k plus. How many members out of Sydney region? I'm not 100% sure but I am 100% sure its atleast 5000.

Do you want me to add more case studies Xman? Collington for example?

Now please ram this lil bit of wisdom somewhere in that landfillesque brain of yours. People support football teams, even when they dont live nearby

I know, crazy eh?

Let's await stewies honest response on this. Stewie, honesty on this one will raise your cred on this site quite a bit matey, show us all what you're made of me boy.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah because prior to gws playing their closest team was the swans Given there's a bit of culture for marngrook down there my bet is safe as houses that there'd be more than a few thou members down that way.

And stewie get back on twitter and ask your chum bum whether the nsw figure includes the act. Its what the AFL do and have done for some time. They amalgamate nsw and act as though its one big state. Quite disrespectful to the canberrans i must say, but hey it makes fools like you think the AFL is huuuuge in nsw, so i guess with submissive brainless sheep as supporters why wouldnt you exploit their naivety?

Submissive brainless sheep

Now get on twitter stewie and prove me right!

but the ACT isnt Sydney. Why would thousands of people living in the ACT take out a membership for a team that doesnt play in their state (other than one off games)?

Youre full of BS

Dear God, you seem to be rapidly losing braincells Xman.. What's going on?

Ok case study number one. The SOUTH SYDNEY Rabbitohs. Membership 20k plus. How many members out of Sydney region? I'm not 100% sure but I am 100% sure its atleast 5000.

Do you want me to add more case studies Xman? Collington for example?

Now please ram this lil bit of wisdom somewhere in that landfillesque brain of yours. People support football teams, even when they dont live nearby

I know, crazy eh?

Let's await stewies honest response on this. Stewie, honesty on this one will raise your cred on this site quite a bit matey, show us all what you're made of me boy.

My response? I agree with Xman. Why would thousands of people from the ACT buy Swans memberships if they no longer play there? They would all be Giants members, unless, like I said before, they grew up in Sydney supporting the Swans.

Sorry stewie you mustve mistaken me. I meant your response with the response of the NSW/ACT chum of yours on twitter. Me thinks Xman will be sittin in front of his comp in quite a manic/schizophrenic state intermittently switching between these ones and these ones [-o< [-o< [-o< quite distraught that the King will be showing him up on marngrook/AFL knowledge once more.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Piesman piesman piesman. I expect better from you.

piesman wrote:

Even if this was true and I don't believe it for a second

Ahhh how's about we start with this lovely amalgamated nsw/act website. http://www.aflnswact.com.au/ why oh why didnt you take the word of a bloke who's played several seasons in the sydney AFL eh? I mean I've got first hand experience yet you seem swayed by some confused buffoon from melbourne who knows jack diddly on most topics. tsk tsk tsk

piesman wrote:

the Swans will end up with another 10k members by the time everyone buys their membership. That's at least 22K - 4-6K (your Canberra numbers)+10k more - 3K more (just in case there are a few more Canberra/melbourne members) = 23 to 25K NSW only members. So even with your dodgy figures RaiderDave is still very wrong as usual.

ohhh piesman you've dropped the ball again ol son. I stated stewie and co were having a mass group premature ejaculation didnt I?

So I guess the best lesson for you here piesman is to never go quoting me as though I'm wrong again. Stick to that rule and you'll not be made a fool of by me again my friend.

Now run along now ya lil scamp gooo-oooon!

You seam a little confused mate, I havent seen any explaination has to why you disagree with me. Perhaps have another read, but in case you didnt read all of the thread here is a summary of what I added to the topic.

RaiderDave said this year (2013) there will be 15-18K Swans members in NSW. You say Raider could be right, but you havent factored in that only about 2/3 of members have been tallyed at this stage (I think I understand AFL membership a little better then you and I estimate that only 2/3 of total members have been listed on the websites at this stage, no insult intended). With the extra numbers, Dave has to be wrong even after factoring in 6K Canberra members (from the original 22K NSW members and 3K non NSW members from the 10K yet to be tallyed, the swans will have minimum 23K NSW only members. Its pretty clear cut in my book. Perhaps a bit more explaination from you could clarify why I have dropped the ball.

Firstly pies you foolishly stated you didnt believe my statement that AFL amalgamates ACT and NSW together. That was your first drop.

Secondly, if you sir, if you had been reading the thread you would have noticed that my argument all along was that this was a group premature ejaculation led by the inept stewie. I was highlighting that right now, Raiderdave could well be spot on the money. Now perhaps your lil tirade and rant about the next few months is true but you've dropped the ball a second time by quoting moi out of context. Stewie is arguing that the figures right now i.e 22k makes dave a liar.

Comprehende now? I hope you have learnt your lesson about never quoting me as though im wrong again. I really do.

Btw You've now dropped the ball 3 times in this thread. You're off the team pies, get outta here and into another thread. Gooo oooooon GIT. Git on outta ere!!

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah because prior to gws playing their closest team was the swans Given there's a bit of culture for marngrook down there my bet is safe as houses that there'd be more than a few thou members down that way.

And stewie get back on twitter and ask your chum bum whether the nsw figure includes the act. Its what the AFL do and have done for some time. They amalgamate nsw and act as though its one big state. Quite disrespectful to the canberrans i must say, but hey it makes fools like you think the AFL is huuuuge in nsw, so i guess with submissive brainless sheep as supporters why wouldnt you exploit their naivety?

Submissive brainless sheep

Now get on twitter stewie and prove me right!

but the ACT isnt Sydney. Why would thousands of people living in the ACT take out a membership for a team that doesnt play in their state (other than one off games)?

Youre full of BS

Dear God, you seem to be rapidly losing braincells Xman.. What's going on?

Ok case study number one. The SOUTH SYDNEY Rabbitohs. Membership 20k plus. How many members out of Sydney region? I'm not 100% sure but I am 100% sure its atleast 5000.

Do you want me to add more case studies Xman? Collington for example?

Now please ram this lil bit of wisdom somewhere in that landfillesque brain of yours. People support football teams, even when they dont live nearby

I know, crazy eh?

Let's await stewies honest response on this. Stewie, honesty on this one will raise your cred on this site quite a bit matey, show us all what you're made of me boy.

so you dont know, but you know its over 5000.......

Moron!

Care for an avatar bet Xman me boy? I'll put it on the table that souths have atleast 5k members who are from atleast 100k's outside sydney city i.e. the regional definition as on the souths membership page.

How's about it, moron? You wanna go for a 3 month avatar bet? Or have I just trrrrrrruuuuuuuuumped you for the fifth time today?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Care for an avatar bet Xman me boy? I'll put it on the table that souths have atleast 5k members who are from atleast 100k's outside sydney city i.e. the regional definition as on the souths membership page.

How's about it, moron? You wanna go for a 3 month avatar bet? Or have I just trrrrrrruuuuuuuuumped you for the fifth time today?

firstly, why say you dont know how many Rabbitohs fans are in Canberra, then carry on like you do?

secondly, you're now saying Sydney NRL clubs also have a proportion of members who dont live in Sydney. Isnt this what you and Dave are criticising the Swans and Giants for? This essentially means the swans clearly have more members in Sydney than any NRL club. Cheers

Thirdly, youve got no proof of the swans members origins anyway.

Youre all over the place with this one!

King-Eliagh wrote:

Firstly pies you foolishly stated you didnt believe my statement that AFL amalgamates ACT and NSW together. That was your first drop.

Secondly, if you sir, if you had been reading the thread you would have noticed that my argument all along was that this was a group premature ejaculation led by the inept stewie. I was highlighting that right now, Raiderdave could well be spot on the money. Now perhaps your lil tirade and rant about the next few months is true but you've dropped the ball a second time by quoting moi out of context. Stewie is arguing that the figures right now i.e 22k makes dave a liar.

Comprehende now? I hope you have learnt your lesson about never quoting me as though im wrong again. I really do.

Btw You've now dropped the ball 3 times in this thread. You're off the team pies, get outta here and into another thread. Gooo oooooon GIT. Git on outta ere!!

Firstly the AFL amalgamates ACT and NSW for tallying local player numbers because the AFL has a branch called AFL NSW/ACT. What this has to do with club membership numbers I have no idea. So the correct ump decision would be that you dropped it on that one. Secondly I never said the the AFL didnt amalgamate certain things in NSW/ACT.

I at least comprehend what you are saying now amigo. But unfortuately the fail is all yours. You backed Raider on this one and failed to understand the difference between club membership and the AFL NSW/ACT subbranch that has nothing to do with club membership.

The other point you are trying to make about the semen going every where to early, I have disproved in the last few posts.

Own you next thread mate. Your out of here.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Care for an avatar bet Xman me boy? I'll put it on the table that souths have atleast 5k members who are from atleast 100k's outside sydney city i.e. the regional definition as on the souths membership page.

How's about it, moron? You wanna go for a 3 month avatar bet? Or have I just trrrrrrruuuuuuuuumped you for the fifth time today?

firstly, why say you dont know how many Rabbitohs fans are in Canberra, then carry on like you do?

secondly, you're now saying Sydney NRL clubs also have a proportion of members who dont live in Sydney. Isnt this what you and Dave are criticising the Swans and Giants for? This essentially means the swans clearly have more members in Sydney than any NRL club. Cheers

Thirdly, youve got no proof of the swans members origins anyway.

Youre all over the place with this one!

Brrrrk brrrrk brrk brrrk. comon chicken. Bet or no bet?

Firstly rabbitohs fans in canberra? and you're claiming im all over the shop. I'm allowed my opinion sonny jim so lemme have it. 5k atleast are members who reside outside 100km from sydney city. Canberra indeed

Secondly, I'm not criticising the swans and giants at all. i'm just stating facts and truth about them, as per usual.

Thirdly, I've got no proof about swannies members origins but I've got an educated opinion that once the proof comes in will trump your ignorance, and arent you worried about it. I dont even follow the game as much or for as long as you and I still gotcha for knowledge

Ahhh its been a good day Xman, a good day of whoopin ass.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Care for an avatar bet Xman me boy? I'll put it on the table that souths have atleast 5k members who are from atleast 100k's outside sydney city i.e. the regional definition as on the souths membership page.

How's about it, moron? You wanna go for a 3 month avatar bet? Or have I just trrrrrrruuuuuuuuumped you for the fifth time today?

firstly, why say you dont know how many Rabbitohs fans are in Canberra, then carry on like you do?

secondly, you're now saying Sydney NRL clubs also have a proportion of members who dont live in Sydney. Isnt this what you and Dave are criticising the Swans and Giants for? This essentially means the swans clearly have more members in Sydney than any NRL club. Cheers

Thirdly, youve got no proof of the swans members origins anyway.

Youre all over the place with this one!

Brrrrk brrrrk brrk brrrk. comon chicken. Bet or no bet?

Firstly rabbitohs fans in canberra? and you're claiming im all over the shop. I'm allowed my opinion sonny jim so lemme have it. 5k atleast are members who reside outside 100km from sydney city. Canberra indeed

Secondly, I'm not criticising the swans and giants at all. i'm just stating facts and truth about them, as per usual.

Thirdly, I've got no proof about swannies members origins but I've got an educated opinion that once the proof comes in will trump your ignorance, and arent you worried about it. I dont even follow the game as much or for as long as you and I still gotcha for knowledge

Ahhh its been a good day Xman, a good day of whoopin ass.

what dribble. Are you pissed or something?

You come out celebrating with Raiderdave about the Swans lack of members living in Sydney, then claim 25% of members of one of the NRLs top Sydney sides resides outside Sydney!

Doesnt this mean the Swans would still clearly have the most Sydney based members of any Sydney sporting club?
Self ownage at its finest!