Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.

they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!

I'd like to see your proof Xman.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I'd like to see your proof Xman.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/r ... 6525246762

here is a few quotes, that will help expain why regionals had to be included:

Brisbane was the most popular team with 22.91 million viewers followed by the Bulldogs with 21.80 million and South Sydney with 19.75 million.

Brisbane broncos were on FTA TV maybe 17 times last season. Does that sound about right. If they were on FTA TV 17 times and totaled almost 23 million viewers this means that they would have averaged 1.4 million viewers a game on metro only FTA TV (I think they were on FTA TV 17 times is that right?). That just cant be right. Therefore this total must be metro+ regionals + Foxtel games.

Collingwood was the most watched club with 24.26 million viewers followed by Hawthorn with 22.30 million and premier Sydney with 19.83 million.

Collingwood were on FTA TV maybe 14 times which would suggest that they averaged about 1.7 million on FTA metro only, if the data they used was metro only. Does that look about right to you KE?

King-Eliagh wrote:

I'd like to see your proof Xman.

Are you suggesting the NRL got 113M from metro only?

interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.

Broken arms?? What are you smoking??

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.

I'd rather dominate in he 5 cities than in the country.

5 cities where that bumbling victorian mess dominates

which 5 would that be you dribbling moron ?

Chappelli wrote:

interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.

every stat eh

131 Million people watched RL on TV in 2012
8 Million more then that Victorian abomination C head

Raiderdave wrote:

Chappelli wrote:

interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.

every stat eh

131 Million people watched RL on TV in 2012
8 Million more then that Victorian abomination C head

prove it!

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.

they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!

but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?

no ?

RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Regionals Xman, we gotta include the millions upon millions of regional viewers in the stats. Then RL gives the AFL a beltin'. Every time.

they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!

but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?

no ?

RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends

You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Chappelli wrote:

interesting "Rugby League - on the front foot"??? If that's the case, extending the cricket metaphor, they must be playing at a short ball!!! Aussie- always King in OZ. (AFL states 45% of pop, NRL 55% of pop but come a slow 2nd in every stat)= League's just a game invented for Geordies with broken arms.

every stat eh

131 Million people watched RL on TV in 2012
8 Million more then that Victorian abomination C head

prove it!

been proven 100 times in the last few months
deal with it wombat

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

they include regionals dumbarse! f it was a metro comparison it wouldnt even be close!

but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?

no ?

RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends

You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.

VFL's 123 Million includes all.............. VFL games played
quite obviously

RL's 131 Million is the NRL & our rep season

read it n weep ... bitch

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

but is our rep season included shirt lifter ?

no ?

RL 131 Million
Vicky Kicky 123 Million
debate ends

You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.

VFL's 123 Million includes all.............. VFL games played
quite obviously

RL's 131 Million is the NRL & our rep season

read it n weep ... bitch

Well pies man showed thats rubbish didnt he Dave?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

You have no idea Whats included or what isn't! All we know is the AFL beat the NRL.

VFL's 123 Million includes all.............. VFL games played
quite obviously

RL's 131 Million is the NRL & our rep season

read it n weep ... bitch

Well pies man showed thats rubbish didnt he Dave?

piesman couldn't convince an eskimo into buying a heater .....