Page 3 of 5
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:30 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?
That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
One game isn't going to cut it idiot!
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ?
Sydney have 2 AFL teams, live on 7mate and Fox Footy. Sydney Swans and the GWS Giants > the NZ Warriors.
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:39 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:
One game isn't going to cut it idiot!
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ?
Sydney have 2 AFL teams.
combined .. they're FTA veiwership in Sydney
would not match the Warriors numbers .. on pay tv .. in NZ
so i ask you again
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-
answer please ?
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:41 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ?
Sydney have 2 AFL teams.
combined .. they're FTA veiwership in Sydney
would not match the Warriors numbers .. on pay tv .. in NZ
so i ask you again
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-
answer please ?
Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.
Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:58 pm
by Striker
If they thought that where are the big crowds for the Giants at Skoda?
You're dreaming, Stew!
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:07 pm
by Stewie
Striker wrote:If they thought that where are the big crowds for the Giants at Skoda?
You're dreaming, Stew!
They're coming. Where are the big crowds for the various nRL teams in Sydney had a smaller average home crowd than the Giants' 2012 Sydney crowds?
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:14 pm
by Striker
9 clubs against 2 clubs will always favour the lesser when it comes to averages.
Canterbury 282864
Manly 175120
Parramatta 201633
Penrith 130301
Souths 226848
St George Illawarra 197111
Sydney Roosters 149790
Wests Tigers 194726
TOTAL 1,558,393
GWS Giants 119073
Sydney Swans 274795
TOTAL 393,868
Wow, huge numbers for the NRL in 2012 hey?
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:39 pm
by Stewie
Striker wrote:9 clubs against 2 clubs will always favour the lesser when it comes to averages.
Canterbury 282864
Manly 175120
Parramatta 201633
Penrith 130301
Souths 226848
St George Illawarra 197111
Sydney Roosters 149790
Wests Tigers 194726
TOTAL 1,558,393
GWS Giants 119073
Sydney Swans 274795
TOTAL 393,868
Wow, huge numbers for the NRL in 2012 hey?
You idiot, use average crowds as the nRL have more matches (so they can get extra TV $).
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:15 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
combined .. they're FTA veiwership in Sydney
would not match the Warriors numbers .. on pay tv .. in NZ
so i ask you again
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-
answer please ?
Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.
Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.
you really aren't that bright are you
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:32 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
combined .. they're FTA veiwership in Sydney
would not match the Warriors numbers .. on pay tv .. in NZ
so i ask you again
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-
answer please ?
Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.
Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.
here is a sample of ratings for the warriors in NZ from May n June this year
they were going shithouse at the time as well
Warriors on MNF....120k ( this one started at 9pm NZ time & finished at 11pm
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-r...-11-june-2012/
Previous week v Storm 200k Sunday afternoon
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-ratings-3-june-2012/
v Tigers on Friday night 140k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-18-may-2012/
Roosters at Home Saturday eve 145k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-12-may-2012/
the average for this sample was 152K a game
can you please point me to the ratings for club games for the swines & midgets in Sydney combined.. that beat these figures
or in fact ... get anywhere F.ucking near them you demented @rse clown
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:40 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
combined .. they're FTA veiwership in Sydney
would not match the Warriors numbers .. on pay tv .. in NZ
so i ask you again
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-
answer please ?
Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.
Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.
here is a sample of ratings for the warriors in NZ from May n June this year
they were going shithouse at the time as well
Warriors on MNF....120k ( this one started at 9pm NZ time & finished at 11pm
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-r...-11-june-2012/
Previous week v Storm 200k Sunday afternoon
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-ratings-3-june-2012/
v Tigers on Friday night 140k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-18-may-2012/
Roosters at Home Saturday eve 145k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-12-may-2012/
the average for this sample was 152K a game
can you please point me to the ratings for club games for the swines & midgets in Sydney .. that beat these figures
or in fact ... get anywhere F.ucking near them you demented @rse clown
spewie ....
If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:42 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
combined .. they're FTA veiwership in Sydney
would not match the Warriors numbers .. on pay tv .. in NZ
so i ask you again
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-
answer please ?
Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.
Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.
here is a sample of ratings for the warriors in NZ from May n June this year
they were going shithouse at the time as well
Warriors on MNF....120k ( this one started at 9pm NZ time & finished at 11pm
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-r...-11-june-2012/
Previous week v Storm 200k Sunday afternoon
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-ratings-3-june-2012/
v Tigers on Friday night 140k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-18-may-2012/
Roosters at Home Saturday eve 145k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-12-may-2012/
the average for this sample was 152K a game
can you please point me to the ratings for club games for the swines & midgets in Sydney .. that beat these figures
or in fact ... get anywhere F.ucking near them you demented @rse clown
given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:53 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?
it aint hard to estimate boof head
if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders
whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:58 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.
the warriors are on pay you **** halfwit ..... 100% of Sydneysiders have access to the secondary digital channels
I'd doubt anymore then 33% of NZers have access to pay
I'd say the swines are considerably less popular in Sydney .. then the warriors are in NZ
and here endith another debate with a clear & decisive victory to the leaguies
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:06 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.
the warriors are on pay you **** halfwit ..... 100% of Sydneysiders have access to the secondary digital channels
I'd doubt anymore then 33% of NZers have access to pay
I'd say the swines are considerably less popular in Sydney .. then the warriors are in NZ
and here endith another debate with a clear & decisive victory to the leaguies
if you count TV as a measure of popularity. Attendance and memberships are also indicators arent they Dave?
Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:09 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:
If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?
it aint hard to estimate boof head
if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders
whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it
Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.