Talking Footy

eelofwest wrote:

Stewie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No they don't you fucking pork barrelled liar.

All of the ACT's top TV shows this year (like every year) are RL games, one union game made the top 10 (Union WC Semi Final).

NOT 1 BOGGERBALL GAME IN THE TOP 10

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

The Canberra raiders get 1 FTA game this year, hardly FTA exposure...

You will do well on this site spewie if you actually new what you were on about or maybe just do some research before making a fool of yourself all the time.

The amount of Raiders games shown on FTA isn't the point dick head. The amount of league and union games in general is. There is 3 FTA league games shown each round (mostly) compared to how many FTA union games? League gets way more exposure, yet union continues to pull in bigger crowds and playing numbers than league does in the ACT.

Stewie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No they don't you fucking pork barrelled liar.

All of the ACT's top TV shows this year (like every year) are RL games, one union game made the top 10 (Union WC Semi Final).

NOT 1 BOGGERBALL GAME IN THE TOP 10

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

a gimp from the bogan slums of Adelaide , telling people wots wot in a city .......he's never been to

this turd thinks all Canberrans follow the Raiders , & while they have the most fans of any one team of any code by a mile
( a bit of winning gets the lime green fans out .... see the final earlier in the year for the proof )

even the Dragons would have more supporters in our region then the Brumbies
then theres Parra ... the Tigers ... the Bunnies .. the Bulldogs

put every League fan from all clubs in one place
& its 10 to 1 over any other code

the TV ratings prove this ... beyond doubt
RL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else

Stewie wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Stewie wrote:

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

The Canberra raiders get 1 FTA game this year, hardly FTA exposure...

You will do well on this site spewie if you actually new what you were on about or maybe just do some research before making a fool of yourself all the time.

The amount of Raiders games shown on FTA isn't the point dick head. The amount of league and union games in general is. There is 3 FTA league games shown each round (mostly) compared to how many FTA union games? League gets way more exposure, yet union continues to pull in bigger crowds and playing numbers than league does in the ACT.

yawnion isn't shown on FTA for a reason you C head .... its a nothing sport
on the occasions it is .... in its biggest games in time zones that are friendly ...every 8 years

it still gets its head stomped in by RL .. as was the case last year in our nations capital
reason being ... our nations capital is a RL town

end of C head
end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No they don't you fucking pork barrelled liar.

All of the ACT's top TV shows this year (like every year) are RL games, one union game made the top 10 (Union WC Semi Final).

NOT 1 BOGGERBALL GAME IN THE TOP 10

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

a gimp from the bogan slums of Adelaide , telling people wots wot in a city .......he's never been to

this turd thinks all Canberrans follow the Raiders , & while they have the most fans of any one team of any code by a mile
( a bit of winning gets the lime green fans out .... see the final earlier in the year for the proof )

the Dragons would have more supporters in our region then the Brumbies
then theres Parra ... the Tigers ... the Bunnies .. the Bulldogs

put every League fan from all clubs in one place
& its 10 to 1 over any other code

the TV ratings prove this ... beyond doubt
RL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else

Yeah, a bit of winning pushes the Raiders average up.... to just over 12,000

Why are you now talking about teams from NSW? I thought the discussion was between the Brumbies and the Raiders? It's hard not to deflect when you're not working with much, isn't it Raiderdave? Aren't those Raiders pathetic

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

a gimp from the bogan slums of Adelaide , telling people wots wot in a city .......he's never been to

this turd thinks all Canberrans follow the Raiders , & while they have the most fans of any one team of any code by a mile
( a bit of winning gets the lime green fans out .... see the final earlier in the year for the proof )

the Dragons would have more supporters in our region then the Brumbies
then theres Parra ... the Tigers ... the Bunnies .. the Bulldogs

put every League fan from all clubs in one place
& its 10 to 1 over any other code

the TV ratings prove this ... beyond doubt
RL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else

Why are you now talking about teams from NSW? I thought the discussion was between the Brumbies and the Raiders? It's hard not to deflect when you're not working with much, isn't it Raiderdave? Aren't those Raiders pathetic

its RL V RU in the capital according to yourself .... you knob molestor

whopped like a bitch boy was lil spewie ...... nothing new about that

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

a gimp from the bogan slums of Adelaide , telling people wots wot in a city .......he's never been to

this turd thinks all Canberrans follow the Raiders , & while they have the most fans of any one team of any code by a mile
( a bit of winning gets the lime green fans out .... see the final earlier in the year for the proof )

the Dragons would have more supporters in our region then the Brumbies
then theres Parra ... the Tigers ... the Bunnies .. the Bulldogs

put every League fan from all clubs in one place
& its 10 to 1 over any other code

the TV ratings prove this ... beyond doubt
RL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything else

Why are you now talking about teams from NSW? I thought the discussion was between the Brumbies and the Raiders? It's hard not to deflect when you're not working with much, isn't it Raiderdave? Aren't those Raiders pathetic

its RL V RU in the capital according to yourself .... you knob molestor

whopped like a bitch boy was lil spewie ...... nothing new about that

So you began talking about NSW because...

You know that union is king in the ACT and probably always will be until the AFL has a team based there permanently.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Why are you now talking about teams from NSW? I thought the discussion was between the Brumbies and the Raiders? It's hard not to deflect when you're not working with much, isn't it Raiderdave? Aren't those Raiders pathetic

its RL V RU in the capital according to yourself .... you knob molestor

whopped like a bitch boy was lil spewie ...... nothing new about that

So you began talking about NSW because...

.

because there are 10 clubs in NSW .... everyone of them has supporters in the ACT






spewie ..... just can't keep up

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

its RL V RU in the capital according to yourself .... you knob molestor

whopped like a bitch boy was lil spewie ...... nothing new about that

So you began talking about NSW because...

.

because there are 10 clubs in NSW .... everyone of them has supporters in the ACT






spewie ..... just can't keep up

LOL clutching at straws much? You completely deflected the argument Raiderdave.

[/quote]

LOL clutching at straws much? You completely deflected the argument Raiderdave. [/quote]

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

disproven by moi ....& its butthurt central for poor ol spewie as usual
lesson for the lad to take out of this
don't mess with the Raider

heres another pearler from our lil **** ******** sufferer

The amount of Raiders games shown on FTA isn't the point dick head. The amount of league and union games in general is

he is a confused chap isn't he

Poor poor vatman, if he could get a team in the ACT for fumbles and giggles, he'd be all over it like a South Australian family looking to invest in centre link payments on the sly

Raiderdave wrote:

heres another pearler from our lil **** ******** sufferer

The amount of Raiders games shown on FTA isn't the point dick head. The amount of league and union games in general is

he is a confused chap isn't he

What did you not understand about that comment you quoted?

Poor Raiderdave

Raiderdave wrote:

heres another pearler from our lil **** ******** sufferer

The amount of Raiders games shown on FTA isn't the point dick head. The amount of league and union games in general is

he is a confused chap isn't he

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

Yeah dave his head is clearly struggling to understand what is going on, Spewie slow down or your head might explode......

This guy is worse then Xman, i never thought i would say this about another poster but damm this guy is doubling Xman's posts and with more brain dead posts then ever...

eelofwest wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

heres another pearler from our lil **** ******** sufferer

The amount of Raiders games shown on FTA isn't the point dick head. The amount of league and union games in general is

he is a confused chap isn't he

More people play union in the ACT. More people go to Brumbies games than Raiders games. If union had the FTA exposure that its poor man's version gets then teleevision ratings for union too would slaughter poor man's rugby.

Yeah dave his head is clearly struggling to understand what is going on, Spewie slow down or your head might explode......

This guy is worse then Xman, i never thought i would say this about another poster but damm this guy is doubling Xman's posts and with more brain dead posts then ever...

TV wise the Raiders and Brumbies can't be compared against each other as neither are shown on FTA enough (or at all in the Brumbies case), so we can't get an ACT figure. Seeing that more people go to union games than league and more people play union than league in the ACT, it would be safe to assume that union would out rate league if it had the same amount of FTA time.

Yes we can, the raiders smash all in Canberra.

You really are a fool.