Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

143k for a day game, plus some on foxtel. Puts the storms 60k in perspective hey?

Add a few more for a preliminary final and I think the ratings will be succesful.

But if you get excited by the nRL achieving higher ratings than the AFL in Sydney you're easily excited that's for sure.

tele tubby ratings when up against nothing else on the main channel for a final
yep
theres some perspective for you

Compared to the storm?

64K on the secondary channel .... 120K on the main
142K on the main channel .... 70K on the secondary

Swines 30 years of very good coverage in Sydney
Storm .... 1 year of good coverage in melbourne

winner ... the Storm quite obviously

Today's Daily Telegraph is reporting just 8,000 tickets have been sold for the Manly vs North Queensland semi-final in Sydney.

Oh deary me. It's finals FFS RL supporters.

Beaussie wrote:

Today's Daily Telegraph is reporting just 8,000 tickets have been sold for the Manly vs North Queensland semi-final in Sydney.

Oh deary me. It's finals FFS RL supporters.

yes ... it may end up being almost as embarrasing as the effort vicky kicky fans in Sydney put up
... when just 19,000 attended a Swines final ANZ a few years ago

I don't think it will be as bad as that for the NRL though this Friday
we may get to 18 or 19,000 seeing as theres no tomorrows for the loser

but of course thats in a stadium with just 40,000 seats

the Swines final crowd of 19,000 .. was in a ground that holds over 80,000 .. jesus
they'll never live that down will they

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Today's Daily Telegraph is reporting just 8,000 tickets have been sold for the Manly vs North Queensland semi-final in Sydney.

Oh deary me. It's finals FFS RL supporters.

yes ... it may end up being almost as embarrasing as the effort vicky kicky fans in Sydney put up
... when just 19,000 attended a Swines final ANZ a few years ago

I don't think it will be as bad as that for the NRL though this Friday
we may get to 18 or 19,000 seeing as theres no tomorrows for the loser

but of course thats in a stadium with just 40,000 seats

the Swines final crowd of 19,000 .. was in a ground that holds over 80,000 .. jesus
they'll never live that down will they

Message for Dave: Sydney is RL heartland! do you see the storm outdrawing any AFL finals in Melbourne?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Today's Daily Telegraph is reporting just 8,000 tickets have been sold for the Manly vs North Queensland semi-final in Sydney.

Oh deary me. It's finals FFS RL supporters.

yes ... it may end up being almost as embarrasing as the effort vicky kicky fans in Sydney put up
... when just 19,000 attended a Swines final ANZ a few years ago

I don't think it will be as bad as that for the NRL though this Friday
we may get to 18 or 19,000 seeing as theres no tomorrows for the loser

but of course thats in a stadium with just 40,000 seats

the Swines final crowd of 19,000 .. was in a ground that holds over 80,000 .. jesus
they'll never live that down will they

Message for Dave: Sydney is RL heartland! do you see the storm outdrawing any AFL finals in Melbourne?

oh but the Swines & their cowds ... their cowds
message for marcus

vicky kicky ..... goonnnnneeeeee in Sydney

no one cares what ********* do in spazbourne ... they are weird ... disturbingly weird

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

yes ... it may end up being almost as embarrasing as the effort vicky kicky fans in Sydney put up
... when just 19,000 attended a Swines final ANZ a few years ago

I don't think it will be as bad as that for the NRL though this Friday
we may get to 18 or 19,000 seeing as theres no tomorrows for the loser

but of course thats in a stadium with just 40,000 seats

the Swines final crowd of 19,000 .. was in a ground that holds over 80,000 .. jesus
they'll never live that down will they

Message for Dave: Sydney is RL heartland! do you see the storm outdrawing any AFL finals in Melbourne?

oh but the Swines & their cowds ... their cowds
message for marcus

vicky kicky ..... goonnnnneeeeee in Sydney

no one cares what ********* do in spazbourne ... they are weird ... disturbingly weird

Swans remain the number one club in Sydney/NSW when it comes to crowds, membership, sponsorship etc, etc. In of course so called RL heartland

Could you ever imagine that being the case for the Melbourne Storm in AFL heartland? Yeah right.

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Message for Dave: Sydney is RL heartland! do you see the storm outdrawing any AFL finals in Melbourne?

oh but the Swines & their cowds ... their cowds
message for marcus

vicky kicky ..... goonnnnneeeeee in Sydney

no one cares what ********* do in spazbourne ... they are weird ... disturbingly weird

Swans remain the number one club in Sydney/NSW when it comes to crowds, membership, sponsorship etc, etc. In of course so called RL heartland

Could you ever imagine that being the case for the Melbourne Storm in AFL heartland? Yeah right.

Quoted for truth and for dopey Dave.

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Message for Dave: Sydney is RL heartland! do you see the storm outdrawing any AFL finals in Melbourne?

oh but the Swines & their cowds ... their cowds
message for marcus

vicky kicky ..... goonnnnneeeeee in Sydney

no one cares what ********* do in spazbourne ... they are weird ... disturbingly weird

Swans remain the number one club in Sydney/NSW when it comes to crowds, membership, sponsorship etc, etc. In of course so called RL heartland

Could you ever imagine that being the case for the Melbourne Storm in AFL heartland? Yeah right.

yeah sure they are
they can't attract 100K on TV in Sydney ..... their crowds are in free fall & most of their members don't even live in Sydney

but hey .... dey is da bomb

Lying fool!

Number one in crowds despite a stadium under renovations and only 2 local derbies per year.

The earn more than any other NRL club too.

Xman wrote:

Lying fool!

Number one in crowds despite a stadium under renovations and only 2 local derbies per year.

The earn more than any other NRL club too.

crowds plummeting along with TV ratings & general interest for this silly little victorian game in our nations largest city
yep
thats all anyone needs to know

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Lying fool!

Number one in crowds despite a stadium under renovations and only 2 local derbies per year.

The earn more than any other NRL club too.

crowds plummeting along with TV ratings & general interest for this silly little victorian game in our nations largest city
yep
thats all anyone needs to know

Bs. This year there were over 30k members of AFL clubs in Sydney and an average of 35k attendance per fortnight. next year will be more once the SCG is finished renovations.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Lying fool!

Number one in crowds despite a stadium under renovations and only 2 local derbies per year.

The earn more than any other NRL club too.

crowds plummeting along with TV ratings & general interest for this silly little victorian game in our nations largest city
yep
thats all anyone needs to know

Bs. This year there were over 30k members of AFL clubs in Sydney

and an average of 35k attendance per fortnight

. next year will be more once the SCG is finished renovations.

This year there were over 30k members of AFL clubs in Sydney

half of which don't live in NSW....
Souths by themselves had more Sydney based members then the swines
the Sharks ... double the number of the midgits

and an average of 35k attendance per fortnight

the fudged figure
the real one .... about 30K ... the swines had more then that by themselves only 5 years ago

next year will be more once the SCG is finished renovations.

any gains at the SCG ... not assured they'll be any ... will be covered by the gigantic loss in crowds ( see wot i did there ) .. at Skoda
vicky kicky to be under 30K over both clubs nex year

vicky kicky ... struggling in Sydney

Fudge fudge ...

Tin hat, quick, run, get it now!!

Any figure you don't like you just claim its fudged. You have zero credibility.

Xman wrote:

. You have zero credibility.

that still double the VFL's

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

. You have zero credibility.

that still double the VFL's

double zero is what dopey!