Talking Footy

Yes and my other tanking case was clearly my opinion as well. You cant have it both ways Xman, otherwise you become farcical.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Yes and my other tanking case was clearly my opinion as well. You cant have it both ways Xman, otherwise you become farcical.

except you made a claim that can either be proven or not!

Have coaches admitted to tanking? No. Theyve been investigated and found innocent champ!

Get the difference dopey?

As of right now, I consider KE a threat to this forum. He has gone beyond just fighting. He is clearly attempting to take over with all this tough "I know better" talk (which I have tried in reply, but clearly KE is too stupid to get the message).

There's only one way to deal with a hostile takeover attempt - kick it to the curb. AKA Suspension.

shut yer gob TLPG.

I'm a threat to your and Xman's lies, deception and dictatorship of this forum. That's all.

Xman you've proven you have double standards in here with your weakass avoidance of evidence and fact. Everyone with half a brain knows that coaches have admitted it. I'll admit it was my opinion based on the words spoken, but that opinion looks everybit to be correct. In the other file you've defended TLPG like he's your S&M master by stating that his claim was an 'opinion'

Again you're a complete farce in here. Keep it up, its quite amusing.

The deceiver and dictator is you, KE. Or at least you're trying to - and failing. In the other file you blatantly STATED that coaches have ADMITTED to not trying to win. It was not an opinion - it was a STATEMENT. With my opinion, the issue is that I have not given an exact figure - and nor will I.

If anyone is a farce, KE, it's you. And I'm not surprised because you are a punch drunk moron who doesn't know when he's beaten.

TLPG wrote:

With my opinion, the issue is that I have not given an exact figure - and nor will I.

TLPG wrote:

It was clear that a large percentage of the SOO crowd was racist

I'd say thats as much as, if not more a statement than my "coaches have admitted to tanking".

Only difference is I stood behind and defended my words. You on the other hand have proven your cowardice.

Pussy.

You stated that coaches have admitted to tanking. They have not. Fact.
The media stated that sections of the SOO crowd were racist. They were. Fact. I extended on the media statement with an opinion and provided NOTHING additional on my own - unlike you.

Who's the pussy? You.

King-Eliagh wrote:

shut yer gob TLPG.

I'm a threat to your and Xman's lies, deception and dictatorship of this forum. That's all.

Xman you've proven you have double standards in here with your weakass avoidance of evidence and fact. Everyone with half a brain knows that coaches have admitted it. I'll admit it was my opinion based on the words spoken, but that opinion looks everybit to be correct. In the other file you've defended TLPG like he's your S&M master by stating that his claim was an 'opinion'

Again you're a complete farce in here. Keep it up, its quite amusing.

Well I was happy to have a RL fan adjudicate as well but you proved your bias from the start.

SHow me one quote where a coach admits to tanking. Thats all you have to do. Thats it. Easy. Go on.........

I'd like this thread back on topic. TLPG show me one quote stating it "was clear that a large percentage of the SOO crowd were racists"



Hilighting this farcical situation is a sinch. I'm getting bored now.

"Sections of the crowd" (quoted from the Courier Mail article that Xman presented) equals "a large percentage".

Nuff said.

I think it said "sections of the NSW SOO supporter group" right TLPG? Comon now, I'm getting sick of being like a mother to you. No more lies my child.

Now find me the reference which indicates it was CLEAR that a LARGE percentage of the SOO crowd were racist.

There's a lad.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I think it said "sections of the NSW SOO supporter group" right TLPG? Comon now, I'm getting sick of being like a mother to you. No more lies my child.

Now find me the reference which indicates it was CLEAR that a LARGE percentage of the SOO crowd were racist.

There's a lad.

Its all about the ambiguous and subjective term 'large'. it means different things to different people, and in different circumstances. If I said my lawn contained a large proportion of weeds what does that mean? Well If I was a professional landscaper with high standards it could mean 2%. If I was a novice it could mean 60%.

Its your fault KE for disputing an ambiguous claim. If you had simply asked for an actual figure you'd have a case.

"admitted" can be ambiguous and subjective if you want it to be too Xman, now cant it.

Hilighting this farcical situation is a sinch. I'm getting bored now.

King-Eliagh wrote:

"admitted" can be ambiguous and subjective if you want it to be too Xman, now cant it.

Hilighting this farcical situation is a sinch. I'm getting bored now.

How in any way have they admitted to tanking?

If you believe that then argue it FFS! So far youve given nothing!

Experimentation is code for tanking. That's the argument in case you won't see it.