Page 3 of 5
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:18 pm
by King-Eliagh
The precedent has already been set in here that if one cannot disprove a claim then the claim is null and void. But dont worry though TLPG, Xman is bias and corrupt and he's on your side.
And yes Xman, I'd like a bs point also. Gimme 10.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:36 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:The precedent has already been set in here that if one cannot disprove a claim then the claim is null and void. But dont worry though TLPG, Xman is bias and corrupt and he's on your side.
And yes Xman, I'd like a bs point also. Gimme 10.
Rubbish. Youve always needed to prove your claim. If the claimant provides evidence to prove their claim the challenger can produce more evidence to disprove it. but the onus is on the claimant.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:55 pm
by TLPG
And there's no such precedent!
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:01 am
by King-Eliagh
Oh bollocks there's no such precedent. There's atleast 5 cases in here which perfectly accommodate such standards. And no i will not bother going and finding them because we all know this case is a forgone conclusion. Now hurry up and pass me and raider our bs points Xman. And while you're at it hand tlpg a best and smartest. He needs some pampering.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:21 am
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:Oh bollocks there's no such precedent. There's atleast 5 cases in here which perfectly accommodate such standards. And no i will not bother going and finding them because we all know this case is a forgone conclusion. Now hurry up and pass me and raider our bs points Xman. And while you're at it hand tlpg a best and smartest. He needs some pampering.
KEs white flag.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:23 am
by TLPG
That entry from KE just smacked of a little boy. You know better than that don't you, KE? There is NO precedent along the lines of what you are talking about, and the reason why you won't look them up is because you know I'm right!
The only thing that is needed right now is my boot, lubed up real good, turned sideways and stuck right up your candy ass! (Sorry - Wrestlemania's today and I'm in that sort of mood!)
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:26 am
by King-Eliagh
TLPG your tough talk is utter low level american filth. Pick up your game son, you're back in the fight club now.
Oh there's plenty of precedents which have been set. One simply has to look through the files.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:55 pm
by TLPG
Show us.
I'm not back in the Fight Club. I'm only here in the BS file to see this challenge through. Not only that, you know I'm right so you try to sink to half arsed accusations to make yourself look smart - and fail. Grow up.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:42 pm
by King-Eliagh
You are back in the Fight Club TLPG. Dont kid yourself cowboy. You're in with us now so pick up your game and dont utter filth like you did before again.
You're not right at all, you've done nothing to prove raider wrong, so how can you be right?
I know I look smart but that's not why I have bothered to post in this thread. I'm here to have a laugh and illustrate the truth. And that's just what I'm doing :D
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:52 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:You are back in the Fight Club TLPG. Dont kid yourself cowboy. You're in with us now so pick up your game and dont utter filth like you did before again.
You're not right at all, you've done nothing to prove raider wrong, so how can you be right?
I know I look smart but that's not why I have bothered to post in this thread. I'm here to have a laugh and illustrate the truth. And that's just what I'm doing :D
he was right in challenging a claim that had no basis of truth.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:04 pm
by TLPG
What does it say at the top of this part of the forum? The Fight Club? No - it says BS files.
You wouldn't know the truth if you fell over it. I don't need to prove that there isn't any tanking. Nor do I have to prove the Swans didn't play dead. It's up to Raider (or you) to prove that it does happen.
And if you can't stand what I say, then do us all a favour and leave.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 4:08 pm
by King-Eliagh
Hey! You settle down there TLPG. I've had just about enough of you telling me to leave.
Now I'll tell you the truth. TLPG posts in the fightclub and in the BS Files. Yet he lies to us and claims he doesnt above. Tanking was proven to be prevalent in the AFL last year by personal admissions of insider AFL staffers. I dont know whether the swans were ordered to run dead but I do know that noone has proven they weren't in this thread. And I can stand what you say TLPG. I've always encouraged you to have your say.
And finally, instead of ears Xman has two large bossoms and instead of a brain he has a small ass inside his head... which generates significant turds... which unfortunately he excretes far too often on this site.
That is all for now.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 4:13 pm
by TLPG
Link the admissions - or shut up and leave, troll (yeah I said it again, so what are you going to do about it, boy?).
I said I would not be a regular contribution to the Fight Club. I never said I was gone for good 100 percent.
Asking someone to prove a negative like you are doing is a massive epic fail.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:09 pm
by Beaussie
TLPG wrote:I said I would not be a regular contribution to the Fight Club. I never said I was gone for good 100 percent.
I wish you would come back 100 percent. The throwball fans are no challenge for you.
Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:11 pm
by King-Eliagh
Link the proof that the swans were not ordered to run dead or shut up and leave. Seriously, what sort of BS file is this. Firstly we dont have raider in here bothering to argue his case. Secondly TLPG cant even disprove raiders claim. What a farcical situation we have here and I'm only too happy to point it out and rub it in. That's what I'll do about it TLPG :D