Page 3 of 4
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:34 pm
by Xman
The only people claiming Tsunami are the Sydney media.
The GWS will take many years to meet their potential on and off the field. A start with numbers I mentioned will be a good foundation to grow on as they start to engage with the region.
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:00 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:The only people claiming Tsunami are the Sydney media.
The GWS will take many years to meet their potential on and off the field. A start with numbers I mentioned will be a good foundation to grow on as they start to engage with the region.
Tsunami
I've peed bigger torrents
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:02 pm
by King-Eliagh
I think you'll find beaussie is a believer in the tsunami. Have you seen the tripe he posts about GWS and the end of RL in sydney?
You, cos and littlest AFL fan are little different Xman. You're all believers in the tsunami. Why cos even believes the victorian rules is about to take over the world
Do you see the panthers and other RL teams becoming defunct due to GWs' presence Xman?
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:04 pm
by Xman
I've spat bigger torrents than the Storm, despite years of success.
KE I think the Panthers will die on there own without the Giants even helping.
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:13 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:I've spat bigger torrents than the Storm, despite years of success.
KE I think the Panthers will die on there own without the Giants even helping.
when the Storm are down to 1500 members in melbourne
talk then
F wit
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:51 pm
by Xman
When the Giants have been there 14yrs and played in 5 GF's we'll talk then! LOL
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:19 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:When the Giants have been there 14yrs and played in 5 GF's we'll talk then! LOL
if the Giants are still around in 14 years
we'll talk then .......
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:20 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:When the Giants have been there 14yrs and played in 5 GF's we'll talk then! LOL
if the Giants are still around in 14 years
we'll talk then .......
If the storm are around in 14 yrs we'll have two things to talk about.
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:30 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:When the Giants have been there 14yrs and played in 5 GF's we'll talk then! LOL
if the Giants are still around in 14 years
we'll talk then .......
If the storm are around in 14 yrs we'll have two things to talk about.
3 more flags
20K members ... average crowds of 25K ... yeah they'll be around
Midgits
ahhhhh
where'd they go .... ?
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:39 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
if the Giants are still around in 14 years
we'll talk then .......
If the storm are around in 14 yrs we'll have two things to talk about.
3 more flags
20K members ... average crowds of 25K ... yeah they'll be around
Midgits
ahhhhh
where'd they go .... ?
The giants are being bankrolled by the AFL. The storm by news.....
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:55 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
If the storm are around in 14 yrs we'll have two things to talk about.
3 more flags
20K members ... average crowds of 25K ... yeah they'll be around
Midgits
ahhhhh
where'd they go .... ?
The giants are being bankrolled by the AFL. The storm by news.....
The VFL are going to get a shock of epic proportions with this venture
if they had any doubts about their product not being strong outside of its heartland
GWS will lay them to rest ... with a massive YEP... we aint that flash out here.
the greatest disaster in Australian Sporting History ... & the VFL .. with the war chest evapourating ... spiralling costs & clubs going to the wall left right & centre
will kill the experiment ... ohh .. about 2020
mark my words
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:02 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
3 more flags
20K members ... average crowds of 25K ... yeah they'll be around
Midgits
ahhhhh
where'd they go .... ?
The giants are being bankrolled by the AFL. The storm by news.....
The VFL are going to get a shock of epic proportions with this venture
if they had any doubts about their product not being strong outside of its heartland
GWS will lay them to rest ... with a massive YEP... we aint that flash out here.
the greatest disaster in Australian Sporting History ... & the VFL .. with the war chest evapourating ... spiralling costs & clubs going to the wall left right & centre
will kill the experiment ... ohh .. about 2020
mark my words
Locked in Eddie. It will be an interesting ride that's for sure. Can't wait!
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:05 pm
by Xman
Well the NRL membership figures are out and it looks like the GWS have already achieved higher membership tally than 1 Sydney based nrl team in the sharks who haven't even cracked 5k!
If they can get to 9k they will be ahead of 6 other NRL teams! =D>
8 of the NRL clubs are still a fair way off their 2011 despite the season already starting!
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:54 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Well the NRL membership figures are out and it looks like the GWS have already achieved higher membership tally than 1 Sydney based nrl team in the sharks who haven't even cracked 5k!
If they can get to 9k they will be ahead of 6 other NRL teams! =D>
8 of the NRL clubs are still a fair way off their 2011 despite the season already starting!
15 NRL teams are ahead of the midgits today
16 if you consider 4500 of the Sharks 4600 members live in the area they represent
compared to 2500 for the Midgits
& when they get belted by 100 pts in their first 3 games .... don't expect anymore signs up this year
& expect about half the amount they have now .. this time next year when they go down in History as the worst VFL side in History
Re: Giants - what would be a successful first year?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:14 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Well the NRL membership figures are out and it looks like the GWS have already achieved higher membership tally than 1 Sydney based nrl team in the sharks who haven't even cracked 5k!
If they can get to 9k they will be ahead of 6 other NRL teams! =D>
8 of the NRL clubs are still a fair way off their 2011 despite the season already starting!
15 NRL teams are ahead of the midgits today
16 if you consider 4500 of the Sharks 4600 members live in the area they represent
compared to 2500 for the Midgits
& when they get belted by 100 pts in their first 3 games .... don't expect anymore signs up this year
& expect about half the amount they have now .. this time next year when they go down in History as the worst VFL side in History
They still have weeks until they play their first game and will grow membership numbers substantially after their next few full games of practice games. Meanwhile the NRL have wlready started and won't grow much at all. Some of your clubs are way behind last year! The one who is way ahead is the broncos who are fudged by single game memberships
imagine if the GWS end up ahead of 6 or 7 NRL clubs in their first year!!
Where is this big catch up you were telling us about!