Page 3 of 5
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:49 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:Reds lions same same beaussie, this is a minor side issue you're raising referring to a minor mistake of mine. The points i make still stand and you have done nothing to prove them otherwise barr screaming "oh shutup stupid" or "go away" or "you're not like the adults in here" or "you're ******* dumb".
Now enough of the teenage girly tanty beaussie and out with a proper response! I dont care if Xman likes sniffin your butt and givin you best and smartest points, I want you to explain without any doubt how raiders claim was wrong. There's been several doubts raised here, now respond to them.
And Xman there's no need to sniff butt in here anymore, beaussie knows you love him.
another failure you clown!
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:08 pm
by King-Eliagh
mistaking the reds for the lions is more than minor? it was clear i meant the lions just got sidetracked with the fightclub topic with the reds and broncos. Deary me Xman, I didnt expect you to stoop like this, you being mr context and all.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:23 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:mistaking the reds for the lions is more than minor? it was clear i meant the lions just got sidetracked with the fightclub topic with the reds and broncos. Deary me Xman, I didnt expect you to stoop like this, you being mr context and all.
Suck it up dummy. You blew it. Take it like a man.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:48 am
by King-Eliagh
It did take it like a man bum breath. Let's move on and get back to the real context of this challenge, which Beaussie has been avoiding like the plague. With the figures so close and obviously in the midst of change can beaussies stats prove raider was wrong? I'd say its simple, no.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:51 am
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:It did take it like a man bum breath. Let's move on and get back to the real context of this challenge, which Beaussie has been avoiding like the plague. With the figures so close and obviously in the midst of change can beaussies stats prove raider was wrong? I'd say its simple, no.
Heard the term "close but no cigar". That applies very aptly to this example.
Your bias is just shining through here. RD made a claim without proof as usual. He was given the opportunity to provide proof both in here and in the thread where he made his claim, and failed. The updated figures were released the next day, but one day too late for Radiers claim.
You're a bias fool who is clearly incapable of even a hint of impartiality.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:58 am
by King-Eliagh
no, im stating an alternative truth which you cannot disprove or discount. And you and beaussie detest me for it. Its hilarious!
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:22 am
by NSWAFL
Xman just ignore Dunce. He is so determined to undermine you it's blinding him. He's still bitter you kicked him to the curb as a reviewer.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:31 am
by King-Eliagh
I really dont give two hoots Xman could not handle working collaboratively with someone who has an alternative view. That's his misfortune and he will forever be viewed as biased because of it.
Undermining Xman is not what I'm doing you silly twit nsw. I'm opening his eyes to truth and his own biases. It's helping him be a better mod and a better adjudicator. I'm the good guy nsw
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:11 am
by Beaussie
NSWAFL wrote:Xman just ignore Dunce. He is so determined to undermine you it's blinding him. He's still bitter you kicked him to the curb as a reviewer.
I suspect this is indeed the case.
In any case, it's no use debating issues with him. He clearly has no idea what the subject matter even is.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:50 am
by King-Eliagh
reds lions, same same, you know I'm posing something very credible beaussie and you detest me for it.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:40 pm
by cos789
Doing the rl sookie sookie dance again KE.
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:46 pm
by cos789
Nothing but a racist idea of blacks vs whites. . It is a poor concept promoting us vs them attitudes. Imagine the public outcry should someone suggest they want to pick a representative side but sorry, white players only
http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl- ... 6263466468
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:48 pm
by cos789
Sporting codes should not organise contests of blacks versus whites
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... heir_minds
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:48 pm
by King-Eliagh
cos789 wrote:Nothing but a racist idea of blacks vs whites. . It is a poor concept promoting us vs them attitudes. Imagine the public outcry should someone suggest they want to pick a representative side but sorry, white players only
http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl- ... 6263466468
Oh dear cos, you're a little lost, and clearly in more ways than one
Re: BS file claim#17: The Bronco's currently have more membe
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:49 pm
by King-Eliagh
Cos stop messing up this thread you stoopid dingo!