Page 3 of 8

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:44 am
by cos789
NSWAFL wrote:
The Broncos need to worry about the REDS is what I said, Cooee! Read my post next time.
And the Lions moving up the ladder.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:57 am
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
The Broncos need to worry about the REDS is what I said, Cooee! Read my post next time.
And the Lions moving up the ladder.

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wot a ****

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:10 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
cos789 wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
The Broncos need to worry about the REDS is what I said, Cooee! Read my post next time.
And the Lions moving up the ladder.

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wot a ****

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:24 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
cos789 wrote:
And the Lions moving up the ladder.

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wot a ****

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
concoring 8-[

you really are a product of the victorian education system aren't you
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:25 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wot a ****

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
concoring 8-[

you really are a product of the victorian education system aren't you
:lol: :lol: :lol:
No, my spell correcting iPad is. #-o

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:38 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
concoring 8-[

you really are a product of the victorian education system aren't you
:lol: :lol: :lol:
No, my spell correcting iPad is. #-o
spell correct only gives you actual words in place of others

what word is ... concoring ? :-k

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:41 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
concoring 8-[

you really are a product of the victorian education system aren't you
:lol: :lol: :lol:
No, my spell correcting iPad is. #-o
spell correct only gives you actual words in place of others

what word is ... concoring ? :-k
It gives suggestions depending on what it thinks you are typing. If you don't watch it the words are selected you don't intend.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:43 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
No, my spell correcting iPad is. #-o
spell correct only gives you actual words in place of others

what word is ... concoring ? :-k
It gives suggestions depending on what it thinks you are typing. If you don't watch it the words are selected you don't intend.

yes .. words .. actual words it predicts you are trying to say


what word is concoring ? :-k

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:27 pm
by Beaussie
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
cos789 wrote:
And the Lions moving up the ladder.

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wot a ****

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
Oh and lets not forget the Lions have more members than the Broncos despite a shocker on field last season.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:34 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:
concoring 8-[

you really are a product of the victorian education system aren't you
:lol: :lol: :lol:
And you're a product of the New South Wales public system that never learned when to use capital letters!! :-k

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:55 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wot a ****

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
Oh and lets not forget the Lions have more members than the Broncos despite a shocker on field last season.
really :-k

ATM

Lions 13,500
Broncos 14,000

bearsy ... wrong ..again!! ...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:38 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Xman wrote:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
Oh and lets not forget the Lions have more members than the Broncos despite a shocker on field last season.
really :-k

ATM

Lions 13,500
Broncos 14,000

bearsy ... wrong ..again!! ...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh really? FFS, I'm calling BS again.

Lions - 13,491
http://membership.lions.com.au/

Broncos - 13,416
Image

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:09 am
by NSWAFL
BS point number 6 coming up for Dave!

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:55 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Oh and lets not forget the Lions have more members than the Broncos despite a shocker on field last season.
really :-k

ATM

Lions 13,500
Broncos 14,000

bearsy ... wrong ..again!! ...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh really? FFS, I'm calling BS again.

Lions - 13,491
http://membership.lions.com.au/

Broncos - 13,416
Image
the week before last weeks tally
good job f wit :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:10 pm
by cos789
Gone are the days when Qld was a rl state.
Now we're arging about just which code has the biggest crowds, largest memberships etc.
Is RU, is it AFL or rl ?
IMO the Lions are set for a large improvement improving their position all round.