Page 3 of 3
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:03 pm
by Xman
NSWAFL wrote:He says RL does not have a DF RLWC, wrong and proven. I never said that.
He says the DF sponsors the RLWC, he is wrong and that has been proven. You said that, not me.
He the says DFAT RLWC as in sponsoring, he is wrong again and it has been proven. You said that, not me.
He then says DFAT, the Department Of Foreign Affairs, well that's a side step and a half because he was going on about the Defence Force.. I was talking about DFAT as long as you said DFAT. I only went to DF when you went there, and it was ALWAYS about sponsorship as far as I was concerned. So there was no sidestep by me. It was made by you when you FINALLY clarified what you meant by DF RLWC.
That's enough. I ask that this file be closed as undecided and no points awarded.
I gotta say I tend to agree. All this DFAT then DF crap. Seriously, Parra, I warned you about this when you challenged it. The definitions need to be clear. This one definitely looks like it wasn't. Sure confuses the hell out of me.
This is not what the bs file was for. Its not to trick people. It's to hold people accountable for claiming bs.
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:13 pm
by NSWAFL
Absolutely right!
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:38 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Hahahahaha.
Well that's it for me.
I'm out of the lying shit-hole of a site with it's bias and agendas where the mod is a racist ***** as well as a KHUNT.
Good luck to the other Leaguies, but I suspect they won't hang around much longer either.
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:38 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Beaussie, delete my account please.
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:42 am
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hahahahaha.
Well that's it for me.
I'm out of the lying shit-hole of a site with it's bias and agendas where the mod is a racist ***** as well as a KHUNT.
Good luck to the other Leaguies, but I suspect they won't hang around much longer either.
Good riddance fwit. Your one the most immature babies ive ever met on a forum! The place can do without your constant dummy spitting tantrums, all because you don't get your own way.
You claim I'm biased yet you insist you're right on every bs file. You're not only biased, you're pathetic. I can't say many people here will miss you so don't get too emotional.
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:59 am
by justanotherleaguefan
LOL, So what that leaves about 5 regular posters on here now?
This place is a joke. It's run my absolute morons who are bias as hell. It's a fucking joke
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:34 pm
by cos789
Xman wrote: Its not to trick people. It's to hold people accountable for claiming bs.
Exactly not for people to use RFL instead of rl, AFL instead of AR, AR instead of AFL or for VFL instead of AFL.
You're extremely gutless in your approach parafeel.
You lied about the crowd attending a rl international.
You cannot accept that Australian Football is doing just fine.
IMO you constant atteck on Australian Football is akin to being a lovely person.
Your LU mates didn't even support you here.
Maybe now,we can have some true debates instead of the constant bs and abuse.
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:36 pm
by Xman
justanotherleaguefan wrote:LOL, So what that leaves about 5 regular posters on here now?
This place is a joke. It's run my absolute morons who are bias as hell. It's a ******* joke
You've only had a few posts on here. One has complained that you can't use the term *******, and another using that old chestnut GayFL. Yet you call this place bias.

Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:51 pm
by NSWAFL
Now that Debbie's gone, Xman, I recommend a decision and I suggest it should be undecided.
Re: Bs file claim#15: DF as a sponsor (of the RLWC) is a jok
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:50 pm
by Xman
Decision: Undecided. Too much confusion between the terms DF and DFAT used by the two members involved.