Talking Footy

Naughty XMAN fudging with my posts.

They have enough supporters to do that. What would be the point of the NRL clubs begging to their measly supporter base? These somcalled fans won't even attend the games FFS!

Apologies Cooee. Hit edit instead of quote.

Clearly the AFL club model is broken when clubs rely on supporters bailing them out.

NSWAFL wrote:

Maybe it's about time they did, because their turnover is terrible compared to the AFL clubs!

tin rattlers .............

cooee wrote:

Clearly the AFL club model is broken when clubs rely on supporters bailing them out.

There is a problem with enequal distribution in the AFL.

I suggest that pales into insignificance compared to the inability of nrl clubs to get into the black.

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Maybe it's about time they did, because their turnover is terrible compared to the AFL clubs!

tin rattlers .............

Take a leaf out of our book, Dave! It might help your precious Raiders!

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Maybe it's about time they did, because their turnover is terrible compared to the AFL clubs!

tin rattlers .............

Take a leaf out of our book, Dave! It might help your precious Raiders!

rattle rattle ............

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

tin rattlers .............

Take a leaf out of our book, Dave! It might help your precious Raiders!

rattle rattle ............

Sponsors anyone?

cooee wrote:

Clearly the AFL club model is broken when clubs rely on supporters bailing them out.

How is it a problem when the fans pay and it works. Seems the only way many nRL clubs survive is to leech off a wealthy owner.

Xman wrote:

cooee wrote:

Clearly the AFL club model is broken when clubs rely on supporters bailing them out.

How is it a problem when the fans pay and it works. Seems the only way many nRL clubs survive is to leech off a wealthy owner.

It works

for most even with more members .. more fans at games they're still ............ broke ... on handouts .... on assistance .. on life support

it most definetly .. does NOT work

You bet it works, doofus!

It won't be long before Nathan Tinkler wonders what he got himself into.

NSWAFL wrote:

You bet it works, doofus!

It won't be long before Nathan Tinkler wonders what he got himself into.

failing on numerous fronts ... is the AFL

All clubs on solid ground in the AFL.

Only one club in the NRL on solid ground.

Easy to see who's failing on several fronts.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

cooee wrote:

Clearly the AFL club model is broken when clubs rely on supporters bailing them out.

How is it a problem when the fans pay and it works. Seems the only way many nRL clubs survive is to leech off a wealthy owner.

It works

for most even with more members .. more fans at games they're still ............ broke ... on handouts .... on assistance .. on life support

it most definetly .. does NOT work

The vast majority of AFL clubs sirvive without any league handouts. They have massive revenue without any AFL handouts. And the nRL?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

How is it a problem when the fans pay and it works. Seems the only way many nRL clubs survive is to leech off a wealthy owner.

It works

for most even with more members .. more fans at games they're still ............ broke ... on handouts .... on assistance .. on life support

it most definetly .. does NOT work

The vast majority of AFL clubs sirvive without any league handouts. They have massive revenue without any AFL handouts. And the nRL?

Can you name one of those clubs?