Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

yep

a BS claim if ever there was one ... called by me
squirmed out of by that bit titted shelia .... Xman

a disgrace

OK Dave, I'll take this to the BS file if you wish but I will win because the word "continually" is there for all to see. It means:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/continually
con·tin·u·al (kn-tny-l)
adj.
1. Recurring regularly or frequently

This is the exact context that I meant and is the reason I said it.

So, report the claim properly like everyone else does and I'll log it as a claim. First Best and Smartest point coming my way. Wooohooo :D

couldn't give an F now
you've been exposed as a squirmer ... a deflector .... a distractor ... a gutless so n so
my work here is done

talk about "BEEP BEEP BEEP"!

Challenge it you dope! You are presented with evidence showing you were wrong and you give the old "couldn't give an F now"

Too funny!

Oh I am tempted to call BS on him for calling BS on you, Xman!

the littlest AFL fan

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

OK Dave, I'll take this to the BS file if you wish but I will win because the word "continually" is there for all to see. It means:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/continually
con·tin·u·al (kn-tny-l)
adj.
1. Recurring regularly or frequently

This is the exact context that I meant and is the reason I said it.

So, report the claim properly like everyone else does and I'll log it as a claim. First Best and Smartest point coming my way. Wooohooo :D

couldn't give an F now
you've been exposed as a squirmer ... a deflector .... a distractor ... a gutless so n so
my work here is done

talk about "BEEP BEEP BEEP"!

Challenge it you dope! You are presented with evidence showing you were wrong and you give the old "couldn't give an F now"

Too funny!

you haven't produced ANY evidence .. to prove your orginal BS claim
or your back peddling... covering up your obvious mistake one but refuse to concede one .. one ..either you flaming drop kick

oh.. I meant .. overall
oh .. but but but .. I meant not all the time
oh you misunderstood .. cos this is what I was refereing to

oh &..errrr..if I even look like being wrong I'll of course of meant something else

i mean FMD Xman
how could anyone take you seriously after this debacle





you are not fit to be a post in here .... let alone be a mod after this disgraceful episode

He's corrupt too RD

The evidence I have shown is to define the term "continually" which puts my claim in the context it was intended. It never meant every AFL game rates better than every RL game every time!

I haven't provided evidence for said claim because you still haven't challenged it! Don't you know how yet? Please do. I'd like an easy point.

King-Eliagh wrote:

He's corrupt too RD

In what way AFL star?

Xman wrote:

The evidence I have shown is to define the term "continually" which puts my claim in the context it was intended. It never meant every AFL game rates better than every RL game every time!

I haven't provided evidence for said claim because you still haven't challenged it! Don't you know how yet? Please do. I'd like an easy point.

define the parameters & I'll see
define continually .. by placing a period of time in which the bogball GF has continually.... outrated all RL games in Aust

the last 5 years
the last 10 ?

Raiderdave wrote:

you haven't produced ANY evidence .. to prove your orginal BS claim
or your back peddling... covering up your obvious mistake one but refuse to concede one .. one ..either you flaming drop kick

CALL ON THE BS FILE THEN YOU COWARD!! AND STICK TO THE PARAMETERS OF THE CLAIM!!

That's slander and you know it. You never formally filed for the BS file in the correct way. You just started this thread and that's all.

FILE IT!!

NSWAFL wrote:

That's slander and you know it. You never formally filed for the BS file in the correct way. You just started this thread and that's all.

FILE IT!!

gee...

don't start crying

I'm not f'ing crying, coward! I'm f'ing angry! If you were standing in front of me right now I'd flatten you!!

tsk tsk. I think we have a threat. Xman the littlest AFL fan has clearly lost the plot here, weeping and then fitting with rage. Settle your man down with a warning as this is bordering on a personal threat.

nswafl you are not tough, you're the littlest AFL fan, now get back into character before Raider makes you cry again.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

He's corrupt too RD

In what way AFL star?

I'm happy with International Aussie Rules star also if you'd like to call me that.

Dont you remember trying to corrupt the decision making process for nsw's BS file with me? I think referred to my BS file win and your leniency to try and sway me to vote against parra in that claim. Clear cut corrupting the process it was. I felt abused and stuck to my morals. Then you fired me.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

He's corrupt too RD

In what way AFL star?

I'm happy with International Aussie Rules star also if you'd like to call me that.

Dont you remember trying to corrupt the decision making process for nsw's BS file with me? I think referred to my BS file win and your leniency to try and sway me to vote against parra in that claim. Clear cut corrupting the process it was. I felt abused and stuck to my morals. Then you fired me.

I seem to remember you deciding in favour of your own case after making great allowances for the context of your comment, while i decided in your favor and was happy to do the same since these were the rules that were laid down. Yet when it came time to treat other cases with the same objectivity you refused to do it for an AFL fan's case. Dubious indeed

You then did it again for another AFL fan's case, as well as acting like a complete tool about being adjudicator. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm surprised you even came back on the forum so quickly. You should have been very embarrassed by your bias and corrupt behaviour.