ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hahaha, add them all together and you might just have enough for a 18 a side 4 team comp![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


Oh yeah and cos you put cambodia in twice. Hows their teams fairing of late anyway? Haven't heard much about them in the media?
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hahaha, add them all together and you might just have enough for a 18 a side 4 team comp![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
So where are your numbers? You can't hide them now the way things are being done.....oh but of course. You're scared to because you know they don't stack up!King-Eliagh wrote:Scaredy kittens posting in numbers for protection!NSWAFL wrote:No it would be buried under genuine spamming by you lot with your useless mockery without evidence!
AFL win. Again. Because the NRL cowards refuse to fight on fair and just terms.![]()
Hilarious!
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
RL are polls ahead or ARNSWAFL wrote:No you are wrong. The battle is relatively close. Professionalism has nothing to do with it.
Not in the big picture, Dave, which you refuse to see. RL is ahead, but not by as much as you think.Raiderdave wrote:RL are polls ahead or ARNSWAFL wrote:No you are wrong. The battle is relatively close. Professionalism has nothing to do with it.
end of transmission
big picture .. small picture ... any pictureNSWAFL wrote:Not in the big picture, Dave, which you refuse to see. RL is ahead, but not by as much as you think.Raiderdave wrote:RL are polls ahead or ARNSWAFL wrote:No you are wrong. The battle is relatively close. Professionalism has nothing to do with it.
end of transmission
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?