Talking Footy

Sara789 wrote:

Hey moron, how could they play rl 100+ years ago when rl was only formed in 1908 ?

I don't know dumbarse, maybe the fact that it's now 2012 and RL started in Australia in 1908 making it 104 years old in Australia?

Fucking thickhead.

Maybe the other fact that RL was actually born in 1895 too ya dribbling moron.

Sara wrote:

Hey moron , how could they play against other states when there were no states prior to 1901 ?

Bahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Hey moron, how could they play rl 100+ years ago when rl was only formed in 1908 ?
Hey moron , how could they play against other states when there were no states prior to 1901 ?

its 2012

100 years ago was what Cuzzy ?

What's that behind the 100? Oh yes, that's a plus sign! Meaning 100 year PLUS!

Double BURN!!!!!! :D

And 101 years could mean 100 years + huh?

Or 102, 103, 104?

Derp derpity derp derp!!!!!!!!!

Poor Sara Dementia isn't nice, still stuck in 2008 are we?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

What's that behind the 100? Oh yes, that's a plus sign! Meaning 100 year PLUS!

Double BURN!!!!!! :D

And 101 years could mean 100 years + huh?

Or 102, 103, 104?

Derp derpity derp derp!!!!!!!!!

All of the above. 100+ means more than 100 years! Here endeth the lesson!

Derp!!!!

So why were you arguing against it thickhead?

NSWAFL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

What's that behind the 100? Oh yes, that's a plus sign! Meaning 100 year PLUS!

Double BURN!!!!!! :D

And 101 years could mean 100 years + huh?

Or 102, 103, 104?

Derp derpity derp derp!!!!!!!!!

All of the above. 100+ means more than 100 years! Here endeth the lesson!

Derp!!!!

yes .... 1908 was the year the first interstate game of RL was played in Australia
104 years ago

guess what einstein
104 is plus ..... 100



here concludith .. the lesson

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Hey moron, how could they play rl 100+ years ago when rl was only formed in 1908 ?
Hey moron , how could they play against other states when there were no states prior to 1901 ?

its 2012

100 years ago was what Cuzzy ?

What's that behind the 100? Oh yes, that's a plus sign! Meaning 100 year PLUS!

Double BURN!!!!!! :D

no .. don't ..

you've made an absolute clusterfuck of yourself
& you want to argue

cuzzy .. give up ... while you're so far behind ... you can't be seen

Bump, this thread has lived up to the usual standards set by Sara, Vogue and the Bogger warrior.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Cos789 (The Great and Exulted One) wrote:

Hey moron, how could they play rl 100+ years ago when rl was only formed in 1908 ?

I don't know dumbarse, maybe the fact that it's now 2012 and RL started in Australia in 1908 making it 104 years old in Australia?

Yes , you moron you finally did some sums but if you go back to your original statement you were comparing rl history with the long history of AR and everyone agrees 4 years isn't anything compared to AR history going back to the 1850s.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

[

Cos789 (The Great and Exulted One) wrote:

Hey moron , how could they play against other states when there were no states prior to 1901 ?

Bahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.

Nice come back

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

So why were you arguing against it thickhead?

Against what? I just called you out on a blatant error in your failed call out of Cos. Nothing more than that!

My error?

You two are the twits that can't add up.

Thickheads.

cos789 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Cos789 (The Great and Exulted One) wrote:

Hey moron, how could they play rl 100+ years ago when rl was only formed in 1908 ?

I don't know dumbarse, maybe the fact that it's now 2012 and RL started in Australia in 1908 making it 104 years old in Australia?

Yes , you moron you finally did some sums but if you go back to your original statement you were comparing rl history with the long history of AR and everyone agrees 4 years isn't anything compared to AR history going back to the 1850s.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

[

Cos789 (The Great and Exulted One) wrote:

Hey moron , how could they play against other states when there were no states prior to 1901 ?

Bahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.

Nice come back

read what you wrote
then proceed to give yourself several .. sharp .. hard .. uppercuts

job done

Parrafeel wrote:

You two are the twits that can't add up.

No, we just care about a stupid comparison bewteen Australian Football starting in the 1850s and rl starting 50 years later.
It's an obvious lose to you .

cos789 wrote:

Parrafeel wrote:

You two are the twits that can't add up.

No, we just care about a stupid comparison bewteen Australian Football starting in the 1850s and rl starting 50 years later.
It's an obvious lose to you .

read what you wrote
then proceed to give yourself several .. sharp .. hard .. uppercuts

job done

What has the beginning of Boggerball got to do with 100 years ago from this week you deluded flee?