Talking Footy

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Yes yes Markus, the same guy that had me and a few others from LU asking the admin to let you back on.

Ha, and this is how you repay people who went out of their way to ask.

All because you're a big bad mod now. Oooohhh, scary.

You really are having abuse withdrawals aren't you!

Try debating a bit without it for a while. You may like it.

When your mates cosTom, ARES, ZERO and RUNVS (hello AFLNSW lol) can debate instead of one word or one sentence answers, I may join, until then, BURP!

See that, yeah, a burp. How many burps farts and other one word answers will you permit from your mates?

I've repeatedly deleted burp and fart posts since taking over. Seen any in the last few days?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Now I went out of my way top post links, pics and whatever proof I could find in many threads even if it took me all night.

Your mates esp in the international thread I made done nothing but one word answers or made up crap, no one proved a damn thing, but when I said something, each and everyfucking one of you wanted proof and when I got it, it wasn't good enough or I got the one word answer.
\
Hypocrites or what?

If I was being objective I'd say you're in front of this debate. You've done well to find proof but you need to if you make bold claims, especially like you did. The same goes for them!

The one word answer crap is what RD specialises in. I'm trying to stop that rubbish.

Xman wrote:

Well that's 3 votes against the use of the term *******, and none against.

Other terms that are already banned are the consistent personal attacks on an individual's sexuality or false criminal behavior, like peeping Tom.

One off name calling is fine, but consistent name calling along the same abusive line is out.

Enough is enough.

Abuse like this may be ok on LU, but not here, from either side!

And hows about the term "native" and implying that Aboriginal people are all drinking in parks? Hows about you address something which is in the guidelines you wank of a moderator! I make one report, which is in fact much more serious than your pathetic address in this post, and you ignore it and delete my public post about it. And you wonder why members on this site take the leadership as non existant. Look into my report or get a wooly pup up you and expect complete anarchy on this forum X'man'

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

Well that's 3 votes against the use of the term *******, and none against.

Other terms that are already banned are the consistent personal attacks on an individual's sexuality or false criminal behavior, like peeping Tom.

One off name calling is fine, but consistent name calling along the same abusive line is out.

Enough is enough.

Abuse like this may be ok on LU, but not here, from either side!

And hows about the term "native" and implying that Aboriginal people are all drinking in parks? Hows about you address something which is in the guidelines you wank of a moderator! I make one report, which is in fact much more serious than your pathetic address in this post, and you ignore it and delete my public post about it. And you wonder why members on this site take the leadership as non existant. Look into my report or get a wooly pup up you and expect complete anarchy on this forum X'man'

That wasn't about you, it was referring to a comment you made. it was ambiguous but possibly in poor taste, but not about anyone on this site.

Totally different.

Unless the breach is clear I won't act. That's the way it is.

I find the "native" comment disgusting, much much much worse than mungo or *******.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I find the "native" comment disgusting, much much much worse than mungo or *******.

Fine, if a number of people find it so offensive I'll consider it somand delete it.

Good boy.

Intentcity wrote:

Xman wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

there's no need for hysterics, let's just calm down a tad shall we?

I'm happy to have heated debate, and even name calling. But systematic abuse like ******* is not on. If one cannot fight without resorting to such childish name calling they're not old enough to be in here. So far the majority have agreed. What's your vote?

No need to reinvent the wheel man, I can understand the burps and the shdcgfffeve!!fbc? Being removed, but let's not go over board, fact is they have their things and we have ours. I think you're a good mod, but **** man, not much needs to change. IMO.

and as I'm sure you're aware of X,, I ******* hate mods, I had plans for this joint and TBH **** hasn't turned out, I have no problem with you being a mod but I also want the NRL represented.

No it wasn't lip service. Be and I have already discussedit. I also am happy for a mod to be appointed from the RL side, but the overall attitude i have noticed in here so far is that heavy abusive terms and targeted abuse, while being acceptable on LU, are better left off this forum. LU has its own flavor. There's no reason why this site can't either. If people cannot argue and debate without being abusive they need to have a serious look at themselves.

As Xman has mentioned, the idea of a RL mod has been discussed and offers for the mod badge made. To date no response.

Xman is doing a good job and correct me if I'm wrong, but the majority appear to be in agreement. If only people would give him a chance. From what I can tell, not much has changed at all and the suggestions put forward here regarding an end to constant personal abuse seem fair and reasonable. Aren't we supposed be fighting about which code is better than the other and why?

Why is there a need to make things personal. Is that a sign of defeat on the part of the poster who resorts to such tactics? Hmm, food for thought.

That's why the extreme slights have to go.

cooee wrote:

3-2

3 all

it stays for the time being

this is the cr@p we expected Xman would try on

to protect the over sensitive cry baby big girls blouse vicky kicky fans in here who can't hack it
I suggest they F off to a saddle club forum where they belong

harden up you soft khunts

This isn't the official poll, Dave. The official poll is 7-1 in favour of banning the term. Harden up yourself and admit it's a bigoted term. Only cowards use bigotry as a weapon in an argument or fight.

Raiderdave wrote:

cooee wrote:

3-2

3 all

it stays for the time being

this is the cr@p we expected Xman would try on

to protect the over sensitive cry baby big girls blouse vicky kicky fans in here who can't hack it
I suggest they F off to a saddle club forum where they belong

harden up you soft khunts

7 - 1

And I haven't voted 7 times so don't blame me. The majority will have the say.

Afraid you'll lose your only tactic?

Beaussie wrote:

As Xman has mentioned, the idea of a RL mod has been discussed and offers for the mod badge made. To date no response.

Xman is doing a good job and correct me if I'm wrong, but the majority appear to be in agreement. If only people would give him a chance. From what I can tell, not much has changed at all and the suggestions put forward here regarding an end to constant personal abuse seem fair and reasonable. Aren't we supposed be fighting about which code is better than the other and why?

Why is there a need to make things personal. Is that a sign of defeat on the part of the poster who resorts to such tactics? Hmm, food for thought.

its now 3 all

the abuse as harmless as it is .. should stay

it adds a bit of colour beaussie .... seriously
you'd be a limp wristed shiela if you can't take a bit of sticking it in ...
what harm is done ...except some feelings getting hurt by the effeminent posters in here ... aka all the AFL ones it seems

take off your fish net stockings & make up
& harden the F up you pack of lady boys

you lot wonder why we think your sport is soft & girly

you are just reinforcing our thoughts on this

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

As Xman has mentioned, the idea of a RL mod has been discussed and offers for the mod badge made. To date no response.

Xman is doing a good job and correct me if I'm wrong, but the majority appear to be in agreement. If only people would give him a chance. From what I can tell, not much has changed at all and the suggestions put forward here regarding an end to constant personal abuse seem fair and reasonable. Aren't we supposed be fighting about which code is better than the other and why?

Why is there a need to make things personal. Is that a sign of defeat on the part of the poster who resorts to such tactics? Hmm, food for thought.

its now 3 all

the abuse as harmless as it is .. should stay

it adds a bit of colour beaussie .... seriously
you'd be a limp wristed shiela if you can't take a bit of sticking it in ...
what harm is done ...except some feelings getting hurt by the effeminent posters in here ... aka all the AFL ones it seems

take off your fish net stockings & make up
& harden the F up you pack of lady boys

you lot wonder why we think your sport is soft & girly

you are just reinforcing our thoughts on this

7 - 1 pal

******* is offensive, especially in the context you use it. Its almost gone.