Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
They do that, Dave, because LU is out of control.
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
You may be happy to just argue around and around in circles with no evidence. I am not.Raiderdave wrote:decent pointXman wrote:rubbish.Raiderdave wrote:so turn fight club into a sterile snorefest ?![]()
do we prefer this ova some spirited debating
I say old chap ... Blah Blah Blah
Can you prove that ol bean ?
No I cannot ... I retract my statement
Very good kind sir .. carry on
![]()
![]()
![]()
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
I'd say not.
But whats the point in fighting if no one can ever prove a point? Because whenever anyone actually comes up with a decent point backed by evidence it immediately gets trumped by someones baseless opinion which he claims is fact.
I'm happy for some trolling to occur but dont expect it to win any arguments.
you mean your point ...
as for fighting if no one can win an argument ... you think people's " opinions " will change with .. decent points ?
please
you are delusional![]()
![]()
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
Neither am I.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
No it doesn'tNSWAFL wrote:Just as long as it's clear that one is expressing and opinion (ie "I think", "in my opinion" etc etc).
There's nothing wrong with "In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual". There's PLENTY wrong with "Raider Dave is a transexual". The two comments have the same effect at the core and it's still a form of trolling. Just not out of control.
That help, Dave? Or are you going to insist on out of control trolling? (King should pay attention to the answer here)
how is one out of control .. & the other not .. how is both not going to get a reaction
In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual".
"Raider Dave is a transexual".
its on .. either way
so no... hardly a solution

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
You probably never noticed it because you never had any posts deleted for not providing a link to proof, only to see the RL fans post a counter argument without proof that was unchallenged and remained. Believe me, it happens all the time.Raiderdave wrote:El does nothing of the sort ....Xman wrote:And El Diablo enforces exactly whay I am trying to do here. Just he does it for one side only.Raiderdave wrote:theres plenty to prove its not as well ...
nothing wrong with LU ....
flogball merkins who get banned from LU are banned because they take their fight into the main forum
something I know I can't do ... so never do.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
Well at this stage thats the way its going. Statements claimed as fact will need proof. Otherwise they are opinions only.Raiderdave wrote:No it doesn'tNSWAFL wrote:Just as long as it's clear that one is expressing and opinion (ie "I think", "in my opinion" etc etc).
There's nothing wrong with "In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual". There's PLENTY wrong with "Raider Dave is a transexual". The two comments have the same effect at the core and it's still a form of trolling. Just not out of control.
That help, Dave? Or are you going to insist on out of control trolling? (King should pay attention to the answer here)
how is one out of control .. & the other not .. how is both not going to get a reaction
In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual".
"Raider Dave is a transexual".
its on .. either way
so no... hardly a solution
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
the Fightclub maybeNSWAFL wrote:They do that, Dave, because LU is out of control.
but if the singletball merkins like intestines .. can't control themselves .. & feel the need to chuck a tanty in the main forums at LU , because they got their nuts handed to them in the fight club
they deserve to get banned & are
the main code forums in this site are quite civilised
trolling is NOT allowed in them
if Xman can't stand the way Fight Club gets a bit chaotic
then he needs to keep his contributions confined to the main forums here at Talking Footy
& leave fight club to those of us who don't mind it.
K ?
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
You have a chaotic site to troll as much as you like. It's called LU.Raiderdave wrote:the Fightclub maybeNSWAFL wrote:They do that, Dave, because LU is out of control.
but if the singletball merkins like intestines .. can't control themselves .. & feel the need to chuck a tanty in the main forums at LU , because they got their nuts handed to them in the fight club
they deserve to get banned & are
the main code forums in this site are quite civilised
trolling is NOT allowed in them
if Xman can't stand the way Fight Club gets a bit chaotic
then he needs to keep his contributions confined to the main forums here at Talking Footy
& leave fight club to those of us who don't mind it.
K ?
I'd prefer to keep this TFC a bit more civilised and more about the fight itself than trolling.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
Bloody control freaks, they're everywhere. Firstly dont tell me what I should and should not pay attention to NSWAFL you flamin tranny! There's absolutely nothing wrong with calling Raiderdave what you like. If members cant possibly understand that calling one a baboon, without providing the exclaimer "in my opinion NSWAFL is", that the member is expressing their opinion then we might as well shut this shop now. For crying out loud, how PC do you chumps wanna go? And while you contemplate this reflect on the FACT that political correctness and the associated rhetoric has a shiteload to answer for in covering ignorant snobby politicians real actions, which can be disastrous. We need to be open and express how we feel in here and thats final.NSWAFL wrote:Just as long as it's clear that one is expressing and opinion (ie "I think", "in my opinion" etc etc).
There's nothing wrong with "In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual". There's PLENTY wrong with "Raider Dave is a transexual". The two comments have the same effect at the core and it's still a form of trolling. Just not out of control.
Raiderdave is spot on, we dont want to turn this into an overmoderated snoozefest. Its the fightclub. Let us be clear and open in the way we feel, apart from racial/sexual/gender discrimination and threats.
Xman if you think things will change with your 'evidence/proof' proposal you are highly deluded. Example in point is the AFL as number one sport cannot be proven unless you have clear and agreed upon variables to be used to define the numb one sport. If it was just crowds, yes, id say AFL is the numb one sport - tv audiences I'd say no, or this is still in the air, international standing I'd no, not by a looooong shot. And we could easily argue over them for some time. Dont change whats not broken Xman.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
I have 2... this one is attracting more posters & interest these days ... because its like it isXman wrote:You have a chaotic site to troll as much as you like. It's called LU.Raiderdave wrote:the Fightclub maybeNSWAFL wrote:They do that, Dave, because LU is out of control.
but if the singletball merkins like intestines .. can't control themselves .. & feel the need to chuck a tanty in the main forums at LU , because they got their nuts handed to them in the fight club
they deserve to get banned & are
the main code forums in this site are quite civilised
trolling is NOT allowed in them
if Xman can't stand the way Fight Club gets a bit chaotic
then he needs to keep his contributions confined to the main forums here at Talking Footy
& leave fight club to those of us who don't mind it.
K ?
I'd prefer to keep this TFC a bit more civilised and more about the fight itself than trolling.
Civilised is for the main boards ..
you wanna " get it on " ... thats TFC
you don't belong in here if you can't stand a bit of heat .. any attempt at turning TFC into a main board like forum will fail miserably
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
PC, King? Are you nuts? I was using the tranny thing as an example only for God's sake!
Xman talked about civility. Hell you were the one who jumped on Topper for a lack of it and now you want stuff like what he was doing to come back in effect? Make up your mind already.
But you are already fitting in;
"If it was just crowds, yes, id say AFL is the numb one sport - tv audiences I'd say no, or this is still in the air, international standing I'd (say) no, not by a looooong shot"
Dave, if you want incivility go to LU. The door is that way.
Xman talked about civility. Hell you were the one who jumped on Topper for a lack of it and now you want stuff like what he was doing to come back in effect? Make up your mind already.
But you are already fitting in;
"If it was just crowds, yes, id say AFL is the numb one sport - tv audiences I'd say no, or this is still in the air, international standing I'd (say) no, not by a looooong shot"
Dave, if you want incivility go to LU. The door is that way.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
It is a League Forum first n foremostXman wrote:You probably never noticed it because you never had any posts deleted for not providing a link to proof, only to see the RL fans post a counter argument without proof that was unchallenged and remained. Believe me, it happens all the time.Raiderdave wrote:El does nothing of the sort ....Xman wrote:And El Diablo enforces exactly whay I am trying to do here. Just he does it for one side only.
flogball merkins who get banned from LU are banned because they take their fight into the main forum
something I know I can't do ... so never do.
what you accuse LU of ... Bigfooty is a lot worse
TFC here ... is neither
lets keep it that way.
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
I do ...NSWAFL wrote:PC, King? Are you nuts? I was using the tranny thing as an example only for God's sake!
Xman talked about civility. Hell you were the one who jumped on Topper for a lack of it and now you want stuff like what he was doing to come back in effect? Make up your mind already.
But you are already fitting in;
"If it was just crowds, yes, id say AFL is the numb one sport - tv audiences I'd say no, or this is still in the air, international standing I'd (say) no, not by a looooong shot"
Dave, if you want incivility go to LU. The door is that way.
& am not going anywhere .... it'll be you blokes finding another forum ... Not Myself n E
K

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
Obviously common sense comes into comments like RD is a Tranny. He clearly is but I'm happy that a comment like that is not intended to be fact but a stir instead.King-Eliagh wrote:Bloody control freaks, they're everywhere. Firstly dont tell me what I should and should not pay attention to NSWAFL you flamin tranny! There's absolutely nothing wrong with calling Raiderdave what you like. If members cant possibly understand that calling one a baboon, without providing the exclaimer "in my opinion NSWAFL is", that the member is expressing their opinion then we might as well shut this shop now. For crying out loud, how PC do you chumps wanna go? And while you contemplate this reflect on the FACT that political correctness and the associated rhetoric has a shiteload to answer for in covering ignorant snobby politicians real actions, which can be disastrous. We need to be open and express how we feel in here and thats final.NSWAFL wrote:Just as long as it's clear that one is expressing and opinion (ie "I think", "in my opinion" etc etc).
There's nothing wrong with "In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual". There's PLENTY wrong with "Raider Dave is a transexual". The two comments have the same effect at the core and it's still a form of trolling. Just not out of control.
Raiderdave is spot on, we dont want to turn this into an overmoderated snoozefest. Its the fightclub. Let us be clear and open in the way we feel, apart from racial/sexual/gender discrimination and threats.
Xman if you think things will change with your 'evidence/proof' proposal you are highly deluded. Example in point is the AFL as number one sport cannot be proven unless you have clear and agreed upon variables to be used to define the numb one sport. If it was just crowds, yes, id say AFL is the numb one sport - tv audiences I'd say no, or this is still in the air, international standing I'd no, not by a looooong shot. And we could easily argue over them for some time. Dont change whats not broken Xman.
Comments like the AFL is the number one code can be supported by evidence like crowd figures, memberships etc. Therefore I have no issue with this being posted. Comments like RL are bigger internationally are also well supported by some indicators.
What I don't want are mindless and baseless arguments going around in cirlces. RD makes heaps of bold claims. You ask for evidence and he just refuses. So what's the point in debating it with him. He just makes it up as he goes.
King, if it wasnt broken I would not have been asked to be moderator.
If you have an issue with my decisions you can complain to Be. But remember, this is an AFL site, and just like with LU's TFC and RL, the AFL will naturely have a slight home ground advantage. You can play here under those conditions or not. We (AFL fans) do when we go to LU. However, In the end I will attempt to be as fair as possible.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Why do we have a Moderator in TFC again ?
oh for gawds sakeXman wrote:Obviously common sense comes into comments like RD is a Tranny. He clearly is but I'm happy that a comment like that is not intended to be fact but a stir instead.King-Eliagh wrote:Bloody control freaks, they're everywhere. Firstly dont tell me what I should and should not pay attention to NSWAFL you flamin tranny! There's absolutely nothing wrong with calling Raiderdave what you like. If members cant possibly understand that calling one a baboon, without providing the exclaimer "in my opinion NSWAFL is", that the member is expressing their opinion then we might as well shut this shop now. For crying out loud, how PC do you chumps wanna go? And while you contemplate this reflect on the FACT that political correctness and the associated rhetoric has a shiteload to answer for in covering ignorant snobby politicians real actions, which can be disastrous. We need to be open and express how we feel in here and thats final.NSWAFL wrote:Just as long as it's clear that one is expressing and opinion (ie "I think", "in my opinion" etc etc).
There's nothing wrong with "In my opinion Raider Dave is a transexual". There's PLENTY wrong with "Raider Dave is a transexual". The two comments have the same effect at the core and it's still a form of trolling. Just not out of control.
Raiderdave is spot on, we dont want to turn this into an overmoderated snoozefest. Its the fightclub. Let us be clear and open in the way we feel, apart from racial/sexual/gender discrimination and threats.
Xman if you think things will change with your 'evidence/proof' proposal you are highly deluded. Example in point is the AFL as number one sport cannot be proven unless you have clear and agreed upon variables to be used to define the numb one sport. If it was just crowds, yes, id say AFL is the numb one sport - tv audiences I'd say no, or this is still in the air, international standing I'd no, not by a looooong shot. And we could easily argue over them for some time. Dont change whats not broken Xman.
Comments like the AFL is the number one code can be supported by evidence like crowd figures, memberships etc. Therefore I have no issue with this being posted. Comments like RL are bigger internationally are also well supported by some indicators.
What I don't want are mindless and baseless arguments going around in cirlces. RD makes heaps of bold claims. You ask for evidence and he just refuses. So what's the point in debating it with him. He just makes it up as he goes.
King, if it wasnt broken I would not have been asked to be moderator.
If you have an issue with my decisions you can complain to Be. But remember, this is an AFL site, and just like with LU's TFC and RL, the AFL will naturely have a slight home ground advantage. You can play here under those conditions or not. We (AFL fans) do when we go to LU. However, In the end I will attempt to be as fair as possible.
ITS ALL A FUCKING STIR

what is wrong with you AFL lot
I have never met a more anal retentive bunch of humourless halfwits in all my life
so damn serious
& we leaguies feed off it .... its our inspiration
pull the stick out of yr @rses & accept the beatings we give you
your problem is we are better at handing it out ...........
its hilarious




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
