Talking Footy

That's all that.......thing......does, NSWAFL. No good for anything else.

NSWAFL wrote:

I would expect from you, Dave. You're not getting to me with cheap insults like that. It's boring.

really



no really ............. orrrrrr come on

I'm not getting to you .................

the fact you replied at all says I did

The West Is Lost.

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

I would expect from you, Dave. You're not getting to me with cheap insults like that. It's boring.

really



no really ............. orrrrrr come on

I'm not getting to you .................

the fact you replied at all says I did

Quoted to emphasis the inability to insult.

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

I would expect from you, Dave. You're not getting to me with cheap insults like that. It's boring.

really



no really ............. orrrrrr come on

I'm not getting to you .................

the fact you replied at all says I did

Quoted to emphasis the inability to insult.

& he's been gotten to again ..........

Topper wrote:

The West Is Lost.

opinion ?
you'd better get some evidentiary proof of this ... otherwise

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

really



no really ............. orrrrrr come on

I'm not getting to you .................

the fact you replied at all says I did

Quoted to emphasis the inability to insult.

& he's been gotten to again ..........

Gee I wonder who's getting who here?

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Quoted to emphasis the inability to insult.

& he's been gotten to again ..........

Gee I wonder who's getting who here?

and again

It looks like this place is out of control again.

NSWAFL wrote:

Western Suburbs actually had trouble at one point competing with the Campbelltown AFC when they were strong in the Sydney AFL competition.

I've mentioned this a few times elsewhere and nobody believes it because of the lack of attendance records for the SFL but I clearly remember a newspaper article that mentioned a Campbelltown/North Shore game outdrew a West's game.

NSWAFL wrote:

I've always felt the Blues made a mistake shifting to the ACTAFL for a couple of years even if it meant going to a stronger competition.

In hindsight, yes. If Easts and North Shore had Joined Campbelltown at Canberra or Campbelltown had remained in the SAFL things could have been very different. The first privately owned AFC was none other than Campbelltown.

Maybe pay a visit to the state library in Macquarie Street and look up the local newspaper for the period. I assume that's where you read that. Unless the SMH picked it up.

That sounds like a plan.

cos789 wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

I've mentioned this a few times elsewhere and nobody believes it because of the lack of attendance records for the SFL but I clearly remember a newspaper article that mentioned a Campbelltown/North Shore game outdrew a West's game.

so the magpies drew 75... & the 2nd divison derpball drew 76 ?
wow ..... kudos

NSWAFL wrote:

Maybe pay a visit to the state library in Macquarie Street and look up the local newspaper for the period. I assume that's where you read that. Unless the SMH picked it up.

yeah cuzzy .... I'm sure it would have been a back page headline .... a Sydney giggleball game drawing 76 family & friends to a game

More "troubles" in the west of Sydney for the NRL

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1pxjl.html

Wests Tigers' choice of headquarters at Concord, and the NRL's insistence clubs be known by emblems, reinforces this. But the rise of a common enemy - the AFL's Greater Western Sydney franchise - has alarmed directors of both Balmain and Wests, particularly due to the Giants' decision to play in Tigers colours.

The GWS might not be a tsunami but they sure are spooking some NRL people.