Page 3 of 8

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:41 am
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Yes.
12 year olds ?

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:42 am
by NSWAFL
Under 12

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:59 am
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Under 12
U12's ... or players under 12 ?

quite different things
what does the article say exactly ?

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:10 pm
by NSWAFL
It is not different. If a 10 year old wanted to play Under 12 competition he can.

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:32 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
It is not different. If a 10 year old wanted to play Under 12 competition he can.

still in a comp with an age restriction right ?
called what

thats right

U12's

what did the article say ?

thats right

U12's

kids who turn no older then 12 before Dec 31st :wink:

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:33 pm
by Topper
Oh the burp machine is on full throttle here. NSWAFL, please stop feeding it the carbonated fluid.

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:17 pm
by King-Eliagh
Topper, are you trying to stop discussion in the FC. Shame on you me boy, shame on you!

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:12 pm
by NSWAFL
Dave there was no reference in the statistics to Under 12 competition. It merely said Under 12. As in everyone under the age of 12. How many times must I repeat this before you understand what it means? Or are you being deliberately stupid?

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:37 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Dave there was no reference in the statistics to Under 12 competition. It merely said Under 12. As in everyone under the age of 12. How many times must I repeat this before you understand what it means? Or are you being deliberately stupid?
didn't need to be any reference .. its what was written
what the AFL wanted to be believed

& the article said
U12's ... as in that age group .. that age divison as thats what it means when you pop an S on it .. had doubled to 85,154
.... nothing else in that sentence
a deliberate misrepresentation

if it refered to all players aged under 12 ... thats what it would of said
all players aged under 12

it didn't
its an attempt at misleading readers .. dumb ones
you fell for it
I didn't

How many times must I repeat this before you understand what it means? Or are you being deliberately stupid :wink:

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:16 pm
by NSWAFL
That's it. You're a troll. Nothing that you say can possibly be taken seriously. Get out of here, dummy, and come back when you get some brains.

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:55 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
That's it. You're a troll. Nothing that you say can possibly be taken seriously. Get out of here, dummy, and come back when you get some brains.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

make me ... you dribbling peanut

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:04 pm
by King-Eliagh
:lol:

Yeah make him NSWAFL aka trolling clone of TLPG!

:lol:

Some of this AFL mob really are trying every avenue available to them to have all leaguies exited from the fightclub. It's hilarious and completely counterproductive to the very meaning of this board. I've told them that perhaps the AFL board is where they belong, but it just goes in one ear and out the other with these airheads [-X

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:15 pm
by Raiderdave
King-Eliagh wrote:
:lol:

Yeah make him NSWAFL aka trolling clone of TLPG!

:lol:

Some of this AFL mob really are trying every avenue available to them to have all leaguies exited from the fightclub. It's hilarious and completely counterproductive to the very meaning of this board. I've told them that perhaps the AFL board is where they belong, but it just goes in one ear and out the other with these airheads [-X

yeah .. thinking the same
they can't stand anyone standing up to them & their BS

Oh.. I'd be wary of that AFL is lying line bub ... :-k

really
the AFL is lying .... oops 8-[
wasn't real wary was I :lol: :lol: :lol:

they are schlong slapping nongs of the highest order .. & the ridicule they bring on themselves is warranted
every .. single .. bit of it

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:25 pm
by Topper
NSWAFL wrote:
That's it. You're a troll. Nothing that you say can possibly be taken seriously. Get out of here, dummy, and come back when you get some brains.
Troll = Burp machine.

Re: History Repeats

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:49 pm
by King-Eliagh
No no Topper, you have it wrong. Raider provides comments relating to the posted article. You troll and provide repetitive comments. Troll = Topper me boy :D

Smell it up Topper, smell it :lol: