Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:25 pm
Name change doesn't alter the fact that the Rabbitohs are counting memberships from that venue.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Topper wrote:Name change doesn't alter the fact that the Rabbitohs are counting memberships from that venue.
It is indeed a large leagues club (there are 3 in fact) and no doubt explains the thousands of non-ticketed membersTopper wrote:South Sydney includes it's leagues club members. If I recall it is quite a large leagues club.
Souths Juniors leagues club has never ceased trading. There is where you'll find thousands upon thousands of non-ticketed members. NRL membership figures are such a farce.Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:Off the Rabbitoh's website.Raiderdave wrote:what Leagues club ?
Souths haven't had a leagues club for ova 2 years you wombat , it was closed down ... & may never re-open
geez what a wombat![]()
![]()
"South Sydney Leagues Club has changed its name to Souths on Chalmers."
"If you want to support the Rabbitohs, the best way for you to do this is to become a South Sydney Football Club Member. There are ticketed and non-ticketed Membership packages available and we’re happy to talk through the different options with you."
geez who's a wombat now ?
It closed in mid 2007 ... & only opened in July 2011..closed for ova 3 friggen years
so tell me exactly how could any of the 21K souths members from this year ......... have been members of a Leagues Club you pelican .... or the 18K in 2010 .. the 15K in 2009.................??
explain that wombat ?
http://www.southsonchalmers.com.au/welcome.html
When South Sydney Leagues' Club closed its doors temporarily in 2007, no-one imagined that it would be over three years until the new Souths on Chalmers was about to open.
F me I have come accross di.ckheads
& then theres you ..........lostcos789![]()
![]()
![]()
amongst AFL club memberhsips ..... ?There is where you'll find thousands upon thousands of non-ticketed members.
NRL doesn't have this problem tipsyTopper wrote:It's about time the NRL clubs were called to a count for this.
they are seperate , completely different operations in factTopper wrote:Fudged figures again. Leagues clubs need to seperate from the RL clubs completely so we can get the true figures.
Gees, haven't you worked it out yet?cooee wrote:
Found this from back in April. Don't know why the numbers for some clubs have gone down in the State of the Game tally.
BS, they are one and the same. Fudge, fudge.Raiderdave wrote:they are seperate , completely different operations in factTopper wrote:Fudged figures again. Leagues clubs need to seperate from the RL clubs completely so we can get the true figures.
LOL...Beaussie wrote:BS, they are one and the same. Fudge, fudge.Raiderdave wrote:they are seperate , completely different operations in factTopper wrote:Fudged figures again. Leagues clubs need to seperate from the RL clubs completely so we can get the true figures.
Rampant? You truly are delusional.Raiderdave wrote:LOL...Beaussie wrote:BS, they are one and the same. Fudge, fudge.Raiderdave wrote:they are seperate , completely different operations in fact![]()
![]()
![]()
AFL fans reaction to seeing the rampant growth of NRL memberships ............![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()